Fascicle 20 · 經律異相卷第二十(聲聞學人僧部第九) · Complete

Trainees on the Path

This page carries Ru-Yi's complete translation of fascicle 20 of the Jīng Lǜ Yì Xiàng (經律異相): "Śrāvaka Trainees, Part 9" (聲聞學人僧部第九) — ten entries about disciples still advancing toward full liberation, not yet arhats but making visible progress along the way. Among them: the Buddha's illusory conjured woman who exposes a proud householder's own hidden lust, a sick wife's blunt rebuke that turns her husband from lechery to non-return, a monk whose vow to rise from meditation at a fixed signal outlives the very monastery he made it in, and the fascicle's grim closing account of a caṇḍāla executioner's seven sons, six of them already stream-enterers, destroyed one by one for refusing the king's own order to kill.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: fascicle 20 complete Source: Taishō T2121, vol. 53, fascicle 20 Compiled by: Bǎochàng and others, 516 CE

Translation Method

Fascicle 20 gathers ten entries under a heading naming śrāvaka "trainees" (學人, śaikṣa) — disciples who have entered the path but not yet exhausted every fetter, distinct from the arhat "adepts" (無學) filling fascicles 13 through 18. Two entries (2 and 3) share a numbering irregularity in the source text worth noting for transparency, and the fascicle's own closing story is unusually severe even by the compendium's standards; it is translated faithfully, without softening. Every entry's full text remains intact.

Fascicle Contents

  • 1. Xuǎnzé and the Buddha's Illusory Woman 選擇遇佛善誘捨於愛欲得第三果
  • 2. The Painted Vase 須陀洹婦病於從事一悟得第三果
  • 3. The Vow to Rise from Meditation 比丘自誓入定經時既久出定便死
  • 4. Killed by a Serpent, Freed by a Verse 比丘坐禪為毒蛇所害生天見佛得道
  • 5. The Monk Who Refused the King's Head-Covering 比丘遮國王著巾屣禮佛聽法
  • 6. The Charnel Ground's Silent Witnesses 比丘修不淨觀得須陀洹道
  • 7. The Blind Monk Who Asked for a Needle 盲比丘倩人袵聞法得道
  • 8. The Learned Monk's Borrowed Robe 三藏比丘著弊服常飢好衣得食
  • 9. The Deceived Husband and Māra's Last Trick 族姓子出家佛為欲愛證賢聖明法
  • 10. The Caṇḍāla's Seven Sons 旃陀羅七子為王逼殺失命

1. Xuǎnzé and the Buddha's Illusory Woman

A householder proud of his wife's purity insists desire could never arise from a mere body of filth — so the Buddha conjures a woman in her exact likeness to prove otherwise, triggering a public humiliation that ends, unexpectedly, in the man's own ordination and awakening.

Chinese Source

人有七藏處。一謂風藏。二生藏。三熟藏。四冷藏。五熱藏。六見藏。七欲藏。是諸藏中。欲藏最堅。依止涕唾。澹[泳-永+陰]膿血。筋骨皮肉。心肝五藏。腸胃屎尿。時會中有一居士。名曰選擇。妻名妙色。面貌端嚴。姿容挺特。居士愛著煩惱熾盛。聞佛說此。即白佛言。世尊。莫作是說。云何欲心起於屎尿。我妻端嚴無諸臭穢。佛時化作婦人。端嚴姝潔狀如妙色。正容徐步來入眾中。居士問曰。汝何故來。答曰。欲聽說法。居士即牽坐其衣上。佛以神力。令是婦人糞污其衣。使此居士不堪臭處。以手掩鼻。顧問左右。誰為此者。跋難陀不堪。語居士言。何故掩鼻而顧視我。答曰。甚大臭穢。以佛神力。令跋難陀及諸眾會。見此婦人污居士衣。時跋難陀語居士言。且觀汝妻所為臭穢。居士答言。我妻淨潔。身無諸穢。若有疑者自當觀之。語跋難陀。我意謂汝為此穢。跋難陀大怒。從坐起言。汝今應名屎居士也。汝妻坐時糞出衣上。為屎所塗。而無羞恥。反欲謗人。又復唱言。此屎居士可遣出眾。即以手牽令出眾外。居士語其妻曰。我敬汝故。令坐衣上。汝為大人。法應爾耶。妻即答言。汝近屎囊法自應爾。居士爾時即生厭心。欲去衣糞。更污身體。謂跋難陀。當何方便得離此穢。跋難陀言。非直此糞污染汝身。更有諸衰。是汝之分。若欲離者當遠此。是以汝妻糞。令此大眾頭痛悶亂。居士答曰。諸釋子等皆多慈悲。汝甚惡口。乃如是耶。跋難陀言。如汝今者何可憐愍。汝今自觀為淨潔不。而欲謗我。時居士謂其妻曰。汝可還歸。既遣之已。語跋難陀。我今明見女人諂曲。多諸過咎。不淨充滿。心生厭離。欲於佛法出家為道。跋難陀言。汝今形體臭穢如是。若以香塗經歷年載。然後或可堪任出家。居士答曰。我若塗香經歷年歲。或身已無常。或佛滅度。壞我出家求道因緣。今若見聽得出家者。我不復住城邑聚落僧房精舍。作阿蘭若乞食納衣。於空閑處。誰聞我臭。佛聞呼之言善來。汝為沙門。修行梵行。居士鬚髮自落。袈裟著身。執持應器。如比丘像。佛為說法。苦習盡道。遠塵離垢。得法眼淨。成須陀洹。重為說法乃至得阿那含。過於是夜。執衣持鉢。詣王舍城。次行乞食。遂到本舍。在門外立。時妻妙色自見其夫。剃頭法服出家為道。即語之曰。法應見捨為沙門耶。選擇答曰。汝昨法應於我衣上。便棄不淨污我身體耶。妙色答曰。汝為比丘應謗人耶。我從父舍到汝家來。未見外門。況至竹園。時有惡魔。語居士言。汝昨見者初非妙色。是化作爾。詃惑汝心。今可還以五欲自娛。沙門瞿曇欺誑汝耳。汝今虛妄非實比丘。瞿曇沙門。常以術惑多人。令其出家。如今誑汝。選擇比丘證真法故。即覺是魔。謂言。惡人汝亦變化我。亦變化是妙色姊。俱為變化。佛所說法皆空如化。爾時妙色得聞此法。遠塵離垢得法眼淨。蠲除疑悔不隨他語。於佛法中得無畏法。謂選擇言。所為甚善。能於佛法。樂修梵行。我亦於法出家為道(出花首經第八卷)。

Ru-Yi Translation

A human being carries seven inner reservoirs: first, the reservoir of wind; second, of raw matter; third, of digested matter; fourth, of cold; fifth, of heat; sixth, of view; seventh, of desire. Among all these, the reservoir of desire is the most obstinate — resting, as it does, upon spittle and phlegm, pus and blood, sinew and bone, skin and flesh, heart, liver, and the other organs, intestines, stomach, urine, and excrement.

At that time, in the assembly, there was a householder named Xuǎnzé, whose wife, named Wondrous-Form, was of dignified and graceful countenance, her bearing exceptional. The householder's own attachment and affliction burned fiercely; hearing the Buddha teach this, he spoke up at once: World-Honored One, do not speak in this way — how could desire ever truly arise from mere excrement and urine? My own wife is dignified and pure, entirely without any foulness.

The Buddha then conjured a woman, dignified and lovely in form exactly like Wondrous-Form, who walked with measured steps into the midst of the assembly. The householder asked her: why have you come? She answered: I wish to hear the Dharma taught. The householder drew her to sit upon the edge of his own robe. Through the Buddha's own spiritual power, this woman then soiled his robe with excrement, and the stench became unbearable to the householder, who covered his own nose with his hand and, turning, asked those nearby: who has done this? Upananda, unable to bear it either, said to the householder: why do you cover your nose and stare at me? He answered: the stench is overwhelming. Through the Buddha's own power, Upananda and the whole assembly were made to see this woman soiling the householder's robe.

Upananda then said to the householder: just look at what your own wife has done, how foul it is! The householder answered: my wife is pure and clean, her body free of any such foulness — if you doubt this, go look for yourself — and said to Upananda: I had rather thought it was you who caused this filth. Upananda, greatly angered, rose from his seat and said: you should now be called "Householder Filth" yourself! Your own wife, as she sat, let excrement spill onto your robe, smeared with dung, and, feeling no shame at all, you would instead slander another! — and further called out: let this Householder Filth be driven from the assembly! — and dragged him bodily out.

The householder then said to his wife: it was out of respect for you that I let you sit upon the edge of my robe — is this how a person of standing ought to behave? The wife answered: you yourself are but a sack of filth by nature — it is only fitting that this should happen to you. The householder, at this, felt disgust rise within him, wishing to remove the soiled robe, which had further fouled his own body, and asked Upananda: by what means might I be free of this filth? Upananda said: it is not only this excrement that defiles your body — there are yet further afflictions that are your own portion as well; if you truly wish to be free of them, you must distance yourself from their cause entirely. It is because of your wife's own filth that this whole assembly now suffers headache and confusion. The householder answered: the Śākya disciples are all said to be full of compassion — how can your speech be so vicious? Upananda answered: as pitiable as you are now, how could it be otherwise? Look at yourself now, and ask whether you are truly pure — and still you would slander me?

The householder then told his wife: you may go home now — and, having sent her away, said to Upananda: I now see clearly how women flatter and deceive, how full of fault they are, how entirely filled with impurity — my heart turns away from them in disgust, and I wish to go forth in the Buddha's own teaching to seek the path. Upananda said: your own body is foul as it is now — perhaps, were you to anoint yourself with perfume for a year or more, you might then be fit to go forth. The householder answered: were I to spend a year or more anointing myself with perfume, my own body might already have met impermanence, or the Buddha himself might already have entered final nirvāṇa, ruining my own chance to go forth and seek the path. If I am permitted to go forth now, I shall no longer dwell in cities, towns, monastery halls, or fine temples at all, but shall become a wilderness-dweller, begging my food and wearing patched robes, in open and solitary places — who there would smell my own foulness?

The Buddha, hearing this, called out to him: welcome! You shall be a śramaṇa, and cultivate pure conduct. The householder's own hair and beard fell away of themselves, a monastic robe appeared upon his body, and he took up the almsbowl, appearing at once in the very form of a monk. The Buddha taught him the Dharma — suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path — and, far from all dust and defilement, he attained the pure Dharma-eye, becoming a stream-enterer; taught further still, he attained even the fruit of non-returner.

That very night passed, and, robe and bowl in hand, he went to Rājagṛha, begging for alms in turn, until he arrived at his own former home, and stood outside the gate. His wife, Wondrous-Form, seeing for herself that her husband had shaved his head, donned monastic robes, and gone forth as a renunciant, said to him: is it truly proper, by the Dharma, that you should abandon me and become a śramaṇa? Xuǎnzé answered: was it not you who, only yesterday, cast filth upon my own robe and defiled my own body? Wondrous-Form answered: you are now a monk — is it fitting that you should slander me so? I have come here directly from my own father's house — I have not so much as seen your outer gate before now, let alone the Bamboo Grove.

At that moment an evil Māra spoke to the householder, saying: what you saw yesterday was never truly Wondrous-Form at all — it was a mere conjured illusion, meant to deceive your own heart. You should return now to indulge yourself once more in the five sensory pleasures — the śramaṇa Gautama has simply deceived you. You are no true monk at all, only an illusion yourself; the śramaṇa Gautama constantly uses such tricks to delude many people into going forth, just as he has now deceived you.

But the monk Xuǎnzé, having already realized the true Dharma for himself, recognized this at once as Māra, and said: wicked one — you have transformed me once already, and now you would transform this very Wondrous-Form before me as well; both alike are mere transformation, and everything the Buddha teaches shows all such things to be empty, like illusion itself. At that very moment, Wondrous-Form, hearing this teaching, became far from all dust and defilement, and attained the pure Dharma-eye herself, casting off all doubt and regret, no longer following the words of others, and attained fearlessness within the Buddha's own teaching. She said to Xuǎnzé: what you have done is truly excellent — that you could, within the Buddha's teaching, delight in cultivating pure conduct. I too shall go forth within this same Dharma, and seek the path (Source: Flower-Head Sūtra, fascicle 8).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The story's own structure is unusually recursive: the Buddha's illusory woman is meant to demonstrate the body's impurity in the abstract, but it is Upananda's own public shaming of the householder — not the doctrinal point itself — that actually breaks through his denial. And the closing twist, where Māra tries to retroactively discredit the very insight that led to ordination by calling it Māra's own trick, only for the monk to recognize Māra correctly this second time, suggests the compendium is drawing a deliberate distinction between an insight validated by direct realization (which withstands even the suggestion that it was illusion) and one merely believed on authority.

2. The Painted Vase

A wife dying of exhaustion from her husband's excessive desire lodges a single blunt complaint through a family friend — and the husband, startled into shame, tests his own new insight into the body's impurity by having his wife embrace a beautiful vase secretly filled with filth.

Chinese Source

昔有婬逸之人。意專女色。思不能離。欲與交言通于夢想。時婦遇疾。骨消肉盡。家有知識道人往反。婦白道人曰。我今所患日夜羸困。將其意故欲陳我情。為可爾不。時道人曰。但說無苦。設有隱匿之事。我當覆藏不使彰露。婦人白言。我夫多欲。晝夜役嬈不容食息。由是生疾恐不自濟。道人曰。若汝夫主近汝者。語以此語。須陀洹法。禮應爾耶。婦尋語夫。夫甚懷慚。內自思惟。我是須陀洹。不即便息意。閑處思惟阿那含果。自知已得道迹。便不復與女人從事。婦人問夫。汝今何故永息欲心。夫曰。吾審見汝。何由復共往反。婦語其夫。汝言審見。我有何咎。我恒貞潔。不犯女禮。何以見罵。乃至於斯。婦人即集五親宗族。告語之曰。今我夫主意見疎薄。永息情親復見罵詈。稱言見我。今於眾前便可說之。夫言。且止須我引證自明。夫主還歸。綵畫好瓶。盛滿糞穢。牢蓋其口。香花芬熏。還至彼眾。告其婦曰。審愛我不。若愛我者可抱弄此瓶。如愛我身。婦隨其語。抱瓶翫弄意不捨離。夫主見婦愛著此瓶。即打瓶破。臭穢流溢蛆蟲現出。復語婦曰。汝今故能抱此破瓶不耶。答曰。我寧取死不能近此。寧入火坑。投於深水。高山自下。頭足異處。終不能近。夫主見汝正見。我觀汝身劇於此瓶。從頭至足。分別思惟。三十六物。有何可貪。重說偈言。勇者入定觀 身心所與塵 見已生穢惡 如彼綵畫瓶(出出曜經第十一卷)

Ru-Yi Translation

Long ago there was a man given entirely to lust, his mind fixed on women, unable to free himself even in thought, wishing to speak with and unite with them even in his own dreams. At that time his wife fell ill, wasting away to skin and bone. A renunciant, an acquaintance of the family, came and went from their home; the wife said to him: I am now so weak, day and night, from my own affliction — because of this I wish to confide something to you. Might I? The renunciant said: speak freely, there is no harm in it; should there be anything you wish kept hidden, I shall conceal it and let nothing be revealed. The wife said: my husband's desire is excessive — day and night he presses himself upon me, allowing me neither rest nor food — and it is from this that my illness has arisen; I fear I shall not survive it.

The renunciant said: the next time your husband approaches you, say this to him — is this truly the conduct proper to a follower of the stream-enterer's own way? The wife, in time, said this to her husband, who was struck with deep shame, and reflected inwardly: I am indeed a stream-enterer! — and at once ceased his desire, and, in solitude, contemplating the fruit of non-returner, realized for himself that he had already attained the path, and no longer sought union with women.

His wife asked him: why have you now ceased your desire forever? He answered: I have truly seen you as you are — how could I return to such relations again? His wife said: you say you have "truly seen" — what fault is there in me? I have always remained chaste, never once violating a woman's proper conduct — why then do you insult me to this degree?

The wife then gathered together her five closest relatives, and told them: my own husband now regards me with cold indifference, has ceased all intimacy with me forever, and insults me besides, claiming to have "seen" something of me — let him say now, before this whole assembly, what it is. The husband said: wait — let me first bring proof, to make this clear for myself.

The husband then returned home, and had a fine vase painted and decorated, filled it entirely with filth, sealed its mouth securely, and scented it with fragrant flowers; returning to the gathered assembly, he said to his wife: do you truly love me? If you love me, then embrace and hold this vase, exactly as you would love my own body. The wife did as he said, embracing the vase and playing with it, unwilling to set it down. Seeing his wife's own affection for the vase, the husband then struck it and broke it open — foul filth spilled out everywhere, and maggots appeared. He then asked his wife: can you still now embrace this broken vase? She answered: I would rather die than go near it — I would rather leap into a pit of fire, or throw myself into deep water, or fall from a high mountain, my head and feet torn apart, than ever go near it again.

The husband said: now you see for yourself what I truly saw — I observed that your own body is worse, even, than this vase. From head to foot, examined and considered carefully, these thirty-six impure substances — what is there in them to crave? — and spoke once more this verse:

"The brave one enters meditation, observing / how body and mind are bound up with dust. / Having seen this, disgust and revulsion arise — / just as with that painted, filth-filled vase."

(Source: Sūtra of Illustrative Parables [Chūyào jīng], fascicle 11).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The wife's own complaint is never framed by the text as itself a spiritually motivated act — she is simply exhausted and wants relief — yet it is precisely this ordinary, self-interested plea, relayed through a sympathetic monk, that triggers her husband's breakthrough. His subsequent test of her, however, treats her own attachment to a beautiful object as proof of a universal teaching about all bodies, hers included; the story does not pause to ask whether reducing his wife once more to an illustration of his own insight repeats, in a subtler key, the very possessiveness the sickness first arose from.

3. The Vow to Rise from Meditation

Two brief, paired accounts of monks who enter deep absorption bound by a self-made vow to rise only at a fixed signal — one at the sound of a monastery gong, the other when the rain finally stops — and who die the very instant they emerge, the signal delayed for months by circumstances entirely beyond their control.

Chinese Source

有一比丘。得滅盡定。乞食時。著衣詣食堂中。其日彼寺打揵搥。晚彼比丘。精勤而作是念。我何故空過此時。不觀未來。何時當打揵搥。即立誓願。入於滅定。乃至打揵搥當起。時彼僧伽藍有事難起。時諸比丘。背捨僧伽藍而去。經於三月。難事乃解。時諸比丘還集會而打揵搥。時彼比丘起定即死。後有一乞食比丘。獲得滅定。以日初分。欲詣乞食。時天大雨。而作是念。若入村者壞我衣色。若不往者何故空過。此時不觀未來即立願入定。乃至不雨自當起。或有說者。雨經半月。或有說者雨經一月。雨既止彼比丘起定即死(出毘婆沙第四十四卷)。

Ru-Yi Translation

There was a monk who had attained the cessation-absorption. At the time for begging alms, he had already robed himself and was on his way to the dining hall when, that very day, the monastery's own gong was struck late. The monk, ever diligent, thought to himself: why should I let this time pass idly, without looking to what comes next? — and resolved: when next the gong is struck, I shall rise — and, having made this vow, entered the cessation-absorption, intending to remain until the gong sounded.

At that time, however, the monastery met with some grave difficulty, and all the other monks abandoned it and departed. Three months passed before the trouble was finally resolved, and the monks gathered together once more and struck the gong. The monk, rising from his absorption at the sound, died at that very instant.

Later, there was another monk, a mendicant who had likewise attained the cessation-absorption. At the start of one day, wishing to go out begging, he found a great rain falling, and thought to himself: if I go into the village now, my own robes will be ruined by the rain; yet if I do not go, why should I let this time pass idly, without looking to what comes next? — and, having made this vow, entered absorption, intending to rise only once the rain had stopped. Some accounts say the rain continued for half a month; others say a full month. When the rain at last stopped, the monk rose from his absorption, and died at that very instant (Source: Vibhāṣā, fascicle 44).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Both monks die not from any external harm but, it seems, from the sheer duration of their own bodies' suspension — the vow itself, meant as a small discipline against wasted time, becomes lethal precisely because the world outside their absorption stops keeping the schedule they had silently assumed it would. The compendium offers no explicit moral here; the pairing alone, two nearly identical fatal vows, seems to be the point.

4. Killed by a Serpent, Freed by a Verse

A meditating monk, bitten fatally by a snake he startled awake, is reborn a deva so suddenly he does not at first realize he has died — and only when the palace attendants' own reflected mirrors show him his heavenly crown does he remember to seek out the Buddha and ask for release from even that heavenly abundance.

Chinese Source

摩頭羅國。尼拘類園中。有一比丘。靜處坐禪。復有毒蛇。床下蟠臥。比丘睡眠。或低或仰。毒蛇自念。此人見恐必欲殺我。即舉身擲。比丘命終生忉利天。諸天玉女各來衛侍。天子告曰。汝等諸妹莫近我身。設當近者必犯於戒。諸女自念。此天前身必是沙門。故生此間受天之福。時諸天女各執鏡前照天子面。見天衣冠。方覺生天。即從坐起。見諸衛從。行至園中。坐一樹下。端坐思惟求定三昧。池水之中有異類鳥。相對悲鳴。聲哀響和。欲求成道。不能得辦。是時天子。從三十三天至閻浮提。到世尊所。白言。受天福盡。下入泰山地獄。如是流轉無有窮已。當見愍濟令得度脫。佛為說法。即於坐上諸塵垢盡得法眼淨(出比丘坐禪命過生天經)。

Ru-Yi Translation

In the country of Mathurā, in the Nyagrodha Grove, there was a monk who sat in meditation in a quiet place. Beneath his own seat, a venomous serpent lay coiled. As the monk drifted in and out of sleep, sometimes leaning forward, sometimes back, the serpent thought to itself: this man, waking to see me, will surely wish to kill me — and struck at him with its whole body. The monk's life ended, and he was reborn at once in Trāyastriṃśa heaven.

Heavenly maidens came at once to attend and guard him. The young deva told them: sisters, do not approach my own body — should you do so, you would surely cause me to break my precept. The maidens thought to themselves: this deva, in his former life, must surely have been a śramaṇa — it is for this reason that he has been reborn here to enjoy this heavenly blessing.

The heavenly maidens then each held up a mirror before the young deva's own face; seeing his heavenly robes and crown reflected there, he realized for the first time that he had been reborn in heaven. He rose at once from his seat, and, together with his attendants, walked into a garden, where he sat beneath a tree, composing himself in thought, seeking meditative absorption. In the pool nearby, strange birds called mournfully to one another, their sorrowful cries echoing back and forth; he wished to attain the path there, but could not accomplish it.

The young deva then descended from Trāyastriṃśa heaven to Jambudvīpa, and came before the World-Honored One, saying: once my own heavenly blessing is exhausted, I shall fall down into Mount Tai Hell, and continue transmigrating in this way without end — I beg you, in your compassion, to save me, and grant me liberation. The Buddha taught him the Dharma, and, in that very seat, far from all dust and defilement, he attained the pure Dharma-eye (Source: Sūtra of the Monk Who Died in Meditation and Was Reborn in Heaven).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

"Mount Tai Hell" (泰山地獄) translates a distinctly Sinicized term: Mount Tai was, in indigenous Chinese belief, already the seat of a judge of the dead long before Buddhist cosmology arrived, and Chinese translators and compilers folded the two systems together rather than replacing one with the other. We keep the term literal rather than substituting a purely Indic hell-name, since the text's own audience would have heard it as a familiar native reference, not a foreign one.

5. The Monk Who Refused the King's Head-Covering

A king, proud and balding, tries to keep his own head wrapped and his shoes on while demanding a monk teach him the Dharma on his own terms — and is refused twice, under threat of death both times, before a single verse breaks through his anger entirely.

Chinese Source

內法常儀。入寺聽法及禮佛者。皆當脫巾帽。時有國王。頭素少髮。加復有瘡。又脚著革屣。自恃豪尊。以疊衣裹頭。入堂內聽經。王白比丘。為我說法。比丘曰。如來有教。不為脚著革屣者說法。王聞懷恚。即却革屣語比丘曰。卿速說法稱釋我情。違我本意者當梟汝首。比丘告王。又如來禁戒不得為覆頭者說法。王瞋恚奮其天威曰。卿欲辱我。今故前却露頭。聽卿說法。若不解吾癡結者。當取汝身分為三分。比丘說偈。不以不淨意 示及瞋怒人 欲得知法者 三耶三佛說 諸有除貢高 心意極清淨 能捨傷害懷 乃得聞正法。王慚顏愧影。即起于坐。五體投地。自歸求滅身口意過。長跪叉手白比丘言。不審此偈。出如來神口。為是尊人知我心意然後說乎。比丘告王。此偈乃是如來所說。其來久矣。王自思惟。善哉大聖。三達智靡所不通。乃知將來有我之徒。有恚害心。今重自悔更不造新。比丘說法。王於坐諸塵垢盡得法眼淨(出乞兒發惡心經)。

Ru-Yi Translation

By the standing custom of the inner teaching, anyone entering a monastery to hear the Dharma or pay homage to the Buddha ought to remove any head-covering or hat. At that time there was a king whose own head had thin hair to begin with, and, worse, was afflicted with sores; he also wore leather shoes. Relying on his own high station, he wrapped his head in a fine cloth and entered the hall wearing his shoes, to hear the sūtra taught. The king said to the monk: teach me the Dharma. The monk answered: the Tathāgata has taught that the Dharma is not to be taught to one who wears leather shoes. The king, hearing this, grew angry, and removed his shoes, saying to the monk: teach the Dharma quickly, and satisfy my own wish — should you go against my own intent, I shall have your head struck off.

The monk told the king: the Tathāgata's own precept further forbids teaching the Dharma to one whose head remains covered. The king, in a fury, summoning his own royal authority, said: do you mean to humiliate me? — and, at once, bared his own head, saying: now hear me, and teach the Dharma; should you fail to resolve my own confusion, I shall have your body cut into three pieces.

The monk then spoke this verse:

"One does not, with an impure mind, / reveal the teaching to an angry man. / Whoever wishes truly to know the Dharma / must hear it as the Fully and Perfectly Awakened One himself proclaimed it. / Only one who has cast off arrogance, / whose own heart and mind are utterly pure, / who can let go of every wish to harm — / such a one may truly hear the correct Dharma."

The king, struck with shame, his own face and shadow alike abashed, rose at once from his seat and threw all five limbs to the ground, taking refuge and seeking to extinguish his own faults of body, speech, and mind. Kneeling with palms joined, he said to the monk: I wonder — did this verse come forth from the Tathāgata's own sacred mouth, or did you, honored one, know my own heart's intent, and speak it only for that reason? The monk told the king: this verse is indeed what the Tathāgata himself spoke, and has come down from long ago.

The king reflected to himself: how excellent — the great sage's threefold penetrating wisdom leaves nothing unknown; he must already have known that, in a future time, there would be one such as myself, harboring anger and the wish to harm — and now, deeply repenting, I shall never again commit such an offense. The monk then taught him the Dharma, and, in that very seat, the king, far from all dust and defilement, attained the pure Dharma-eye (Source: Sūtra of the Beggar Who Gave Rise to a Malicious Heart).

6. The Charnel Ground's Silent Witnesses

A monk accused of trespassing on a farmer's field explains he was only seeking "witnesses" — and leads the suspicious farmer to a charnel ground where the scattered dead themselves testify, wordlessly, to the very impurity the monk has spent his own practice contemplating.

Chinese Source

佛在舍衛國。有異比丘。日至城外曠野塜間路。由他田乃得達彼。其主見已便興瞋恚。此何道士。日往來不修道德。即問道人。汝何乞士。在吾田中縱橫往來。乃成人蹤。道人報曰。吾有鬪訟來求證人。時彼田主。宿緣鉤連應蒙得度。便逐道人。私匿從行。見在塜間。尸骸狼藉。膖脹臭穢。鳥狩食噉。散落其處。或有食噉盡不盡者。有似灰鴿。蛆蟲囋[口*束]。臭穢難近。烏鵲狐狗。老鷲鵄鵂。噉死人屍。比丘舉手。語彼人曰。此諸鳥狩。是我證人。問曰。此諸鳥狩。何為證人。汝今比丘與誰共諍。比丘報曰。心之為病。多諸漏患。我觀此骸。分別惡露。便還房室。自觀我身。從頭至足。與彼無異。然此心意。流馳萬端。追逐幻偽。色聲香味細滑之法。我今欲識心之原本。汝心今當興起是念。無令將吾入於地獄餓鬼之中。我今凡夫未脫諸縛。然此心賊不見從命。以是之故日往曠野。為說惡露不淨之想。復興心說心。為卒暴亂錯不定心。今當改無造惡緣。時彼田主。聞道人教。以手揮淚。咽哽難言。然彼田主。於迦葉佛十千歲中。修不淨想。尋時分別。三十六物。惡露不淨。爾時比丘及彼田主。即彼曠野大畏塜間得須陀洹道(出比丘求證人經)。

Ru-Yi Translation

The Buddha dwelt in Śrāvastī. There was a certain monk who each day walked a path through the open wilderness beyond the city, past the charnel ground, and had to cross another man's field to reach it. The field's owner, seeing this, grew angry: what manner of renunciant is this, coming and going each day, cultivating no virtue at all? — and asked the monk: what kind of beggar-mendicant are you, wandering back and forth across my own field, until your own footprints have worn a path? The monk answered: I have a dispute, and have come seeking a witness.

The field's owner, bound to the monk by some past karmic connection destined to bring him liberation, followed the monk secretly, and came to the charnel ground, where he saw corpses scattered in disarray, bloated and foul, torn at by birds and beasts, strewn about the place — some eaten entirely, some only partly, some resembling ashen doves, crawling with maggots, their stench unbearable to approach; crows, magpies, foxes, dogs, aged vultures, kites, and owls all fed upon the dead.

The monk raised his hand and said to the man: these very birds and beasts are my own witnesses. The man asked: how can these birds and beasts serve as witnesses? Monk, with whom is it that you truly dispute? The monk answered: it is the mind itself that is diseased, riddled with countless afflictions and outflows. I come here to observe these remains, to discern their foulness clearly, and then return to my own room, and observe my own body in turn — from head to foot, no different at all from what lies here. And yet this mind of mine still races in ten thousand directions, chasing after illusion and falsehood, after forms, sounds, scents, tastes, and pleasing textures. I wish now to know the mind's own true origin — you, mind, should give rise to this very thought: let nothing carry me down into the hells or among the hungry ghosts. I am still an ordinary being, not yet free of every bond, and yet this thieving mind of mine will not obey my own will — it is for this very reason that I come daily to this wilderness, to contemplate the foulness of what lies here, again and again rousing the mind to examine itself, since it is a mind so easily thrown into sudden disorder and confusion; I must now correct it, and give rise to no further cause for wrongdoing.

The field's owner, hearing the renunciant's own teaching, wiped away his tears, his throat too choked to speak. This same man, it happened, had once, in the ten-thousand years of Kāśyapa Buddha's own dispensation, cultivated the contemplation of impurity, and now, in that very moment, discerned once more the thirty-six impure substances of the body, and its foulness. And so, in that same wilderness, in that great and fearsome charnel ground, both the monk and the field's owner together attained the fruit of stream-entry (Source: Sūtra of the Monk Who Sought a Witness).

7. The Blind Monk Who Asked for a Needle

A brief miracle fragment: a blind monk mending his own robe alone calls out for anyone who loves merit to help him thread his needle — and the Buddha himself answers, teaching that even one whose own merit is already complete still delights in the act of generosity itself.

Chinese Source

有一盲比丘。眼無所見。而以手縫衣。時針袵脫。便言。誰愛福德。為我袵針。是時佛到其所。語比丘言。我是愛福德人。為汝袵來。是比丘識佛聲。疾起作禮。白佛言。佛功德已滿。云何言愛福德。佛報言。我雖功德已滿。我深知功德因果。於一切眾生中。得最第一。由此功德。是故比丘讚歎功德。次為說法。時此比丘得法眼淨。肉眼更明(出大智論第十卷)。

Ru-Yi Translation

There was a blind monk, his eyes seeing nothing at all, who mended his own robe by touch alone. At one point the needle slipped from the cloth, and he called out: whoever loves merit, come thread this needle for me! At that moment the Buddha himself came to his side, and said to the monk: I am one who loves merit — I have come to thread it for you. The monk, recognizing the Buddha's own voice, rose at once and bowed, saying: the Buddha's own merit is already complete — how can you say you love merit still? The Buddha answered: though my own merit is indeed complete, I understand most deeply of all beings the very cause and fruit of merit itself — it is for this reason that I still delight in it.

The monk, praising this teaching on merit, was then taught the Dharma further, and attained the pure Dharma-eye, his own fleshly eyes growing brighter still (Source: Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra, fascicle 10).

8. The Learned Monk's Borrowed Robe

A brief miracle fragment: a Tripiṭaka master turned away from a royal feast again and again for his worn robes discovers the simplest of workarounds — and honors the borrowed robe, not himself, with the food it alone was allowed to receive.

Chinese Source

罽賓三藏比丘。阿蘭若法。至一王寺。設大會。守門人見其衣服麁弊遮門不前。如是數數。以衣服弊故每不得前。便作方便。假借好衣而來。門家不禁。既至會坐。得種種好食。先以與衣。眾人問言。何以爾也。答言。我比丘數來每不得入。今以衣故得在此坐。得種種好食。故先與衣(出大智論第四卷)。

Ru-Yi Translation

A Tripiṭaka master monk of Kaśmīra, who practiced the wilderness-dwelling discipline, came once to a royal monastery where a great assembly was being held. The gatekeeper, seeing his robes coarse and worn, barred him at the gate, and this happened again and again — each time turned away only because of his own worn robes.

He then devised a simple solution: borrowing a fine robe, he came again, and this time the gatekeeper did not stop him. Once seated in the assembly, he received all manner of fine food — and offered it first to the robe itself. The assembly, seeing this, asked him why. He answered: I, this same monk, have come here many times and was never once let in — it is only because of this robe that I am permitted to sit here now, and receive all this fine food; it is for this reason that I offer it first to the robe (Source: Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra, fascicle 4).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

This short, dry piece of comedy carries a sharper edge than its brevity suggests: an entire monastic community's hospitality, meant to honor spiritual attainment, turns out in practice to honor fabric alone — and the monk's gesture of feeding the robe rather than himself is less a joke at his own expense than a pointed demonstration of exactly whom the gatekeepers were actually welcoming all along.

9. The Deceived Husband and Māra's Last Trick

A man ordains after his wife remarries, but cannot let go of longing for her — until the Buddha strips away his delusion directly. The Buddha then traces the pattern to a jealous king in a past life, and a wandering ascetic who taught him, through sheer persistence, that desire itself could be released.

Chinese Source

時有族姓子。棄家捐妻捨諸眷屬。行作沙門。其婦端正姝妙。見夫捨家。便復行嫁。族姓子聞之。心即生念。與婦相娛樂。時愁憂憒惱。不復共樂淨修梵行。便起歸家。諸比丘聞。便往啟佛。佛呼為除癡愛塵勞之穢休息眾想。時族姓子尋時證明賢聖之法。時諸比丘白世尊曰。自非如來孰能爾乎。告諸比丘。此比丘者。不但今世心常在欲。乃往過去久遠世時。有一國王。名曰方迹。中宮婇女不可稱數。婬盪鬪爭不肯共和。適鬪爭已。便出宮去。方迹求之不知所趣。愁憂不樂不能自解。於時有一仙人。與五神通。神足飛行威神無極。名曰無樂。飛在空中。忽然來下。何為說愛欲之難離欲之德。出家為道。修四梵行。壽終之後。生于梵天。佛告諸比丘。爾時方迹王者。則此比丘是。無樂仙人者。則我身是(出那賴經)。

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time there was a son of a good family who abandoned his own household, wife, and every relation, to become a śramaṇa. His wife, of dignified and lovely appearance, seeing her husband had abandoned their home, remarried in turn. The son of good family, hearing of this, felt a thought arise in his own heart, longing to share pleasure with his wife once more, and, overcome with sorrow and vexation, could no longer take joy in cultivating pure conduct together with the others, and rose to return home.

The monks, hearing of this, went and reported it to the Buddha, who summoned him and spoke, dispelling the very defilement of his own foolish craving and the dust of worldly toil, and stilling every confused thought. The son of good family, in that very moment, realized directly the noble and clear Dharma for himself.

The monks then said to the World-Honored One: were it not for the Tathāgata himself, who else could have accomplished this? The Buddha told the monks: this monk's heart has not only, in this present life, remained fixed on desire — in a past age, long ago, there was a king named Fāngjī, whose inner palace held consorts and attendants beyond counting, given to lustful indulgence and endless quarreling among themselves, unwilling ever to live in harmony. Once, after a particular quarrel, one consort left the palace entirely; King Fāngjī sought her everywhere, not knowing where she had gone, and fell into such sorrow and displeasure that he could not free himself from it.

At that time there was a sage, possessed of the five supernormal powers, able to fly through the air with boundless spiritual might, named Joyless, who, flying through the sky, suddenly descended, and spoke to the king of how difficult desire and longing are to escape, and of the virtue found in freedom from desire, urging him to go forth and practice the path, and cultivate the four pure abodes — and, when his own life at last ended, he was reborn in the Brahmā heaven.

The Buddha told the monks: could King Fāngjī of that time be anyone other than this very monk now? And the sage Joyless was myself (Source: Nàlài Sūtra).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

"那賴經" is preserved here as the pinyin "Nàlài Sūtra" rather than reconstructed into a Sanskrit or Pali title, since no settled equivalent is attested with confidence; per this project's standing rule, an uncertain reconstruction is worse than an honest transliteration. Note too that the present-life episode ends with the monk's own crisis dissolved directly by the Buddha's teaching — the text never actually tells us what became of the remarried wife, or whether the monk's peace required her own consent to anything; the story's interest lies entirely in his release from craving, not in her circumstances.

10. The Caṇḍāla's Seven Sons

Fascicle 20 closes with its grimmest entry: an executioner caste's seven sons, six already stream-enterers and their mother already a non-returner, are put to death one after another by an enraged king for refusing, on account of their own precepts, to carry out his order to kill — until only their mother's grief-stricken confession of the youngest son's still-unfinished practice moves the king to horror at what he has done.

Chinese Source

昔旃陀利家生七男。六兄得須陀洹道。小者故處凡夫。母人旃陀利得阿那含道。兄弟七人盡受五戒。彼國常儀。旃陀利行殺。國中男女。犯殺盜婬及餘重罪。盡使旃陀利殺之。時國王召彼大兒言。有應死之徒。汝行殺之。其拜自陳。特願弘恕。我受五戒。守身謹慎。蟻子不敢殺。不能為非。寧自殺身。不敢犯戒。時王奮怒。勅市殺之。復白王。身是王民。心是我資。欲殺便殺。不得仰從。王即令梟首。次召諸弟。六人皆言。受戒不敢行殺。王瞋恚盛。盡便殺之。次復召小弟。母子俱來。王見母來倍復瞋怒。前殺六子。母不送行。今召小子。何故便來。母曰。願聽微言以自宣理。前六子者。盡得須陀洹道。正使大王取彼六人碎身如塵者。終不興惡如一毛髮。今此小者。處在凡夫。身雖修善。未蒙道法。是故念子。既未得道。或能失意。畏王教令。自惜形命。毀戒行殺。身壞命終。入太山地獄。憐念子故。是以送來。王復問母。前死六子。盡得須陀洹道耶。答曰。盡得。王復問母。母身為得何道。母答曰。得阿那含道。王聞斯語。自投于地。稱冤自責。我造罪根。施心建意殺六須陀洹。身意煩惱坐不安席即自嚴辦香油蘇薪。取六死尸而闍維之。起六偷婆興殺之供養。日三懺悔。意願滅罪。漸漸微薄。復出財貨。給彼老母。至於齋日。數數懺悔。冀得罪薄。免於地獄(出慈仁不殺經)。

Ru-Yi Translation

Long ago, in a caṇḍāla household, seven sons were born. The six elder brothers had all attained the fruit of stream-entry; the youngest alone remained an ordinary being. Their mother, a caṇḍālī woman, had attained the fruit of non-returner. All seven brothers, together, had received the five precepts.

In that kingdom it was the standing custom that the caṇḍāla caste alone carried out executions; whenever any man or woman in the realm committed killing, theft, sexual misconduct, or any other grave offense, it was always a caṇḍāla who was made to put them to death. The king summoned the eldest son and told him: there is a criminal condemned to die — go and execute him. The son bowed and pleaded for himself: I beg your great mercy — I have received the five precepts, and guard my own conduct with the utmost care; I would not dare kill even an ant, still less commit such a wrong. I would rather take my own life than dare to violate the precept.

The king, in a rage, ordered him executed in the marketplace instead. The son said further to the king: this body of mine belongs to you, my sovereign, but this heart is my own — if you wish to kill me, then kill me; I cannot obey your command against my own conscience. The king had him beheaded at once.

He then summoned the other brothers in turn; all six said alike: having received the precepts, we dare not commit killing. The king, his fury only mounting, had them all put to death as well.

He then summoned the youngest brother; both mother and son came together before him. The king, seeing the mother arrive, grew angrier still: when I had the first six sons killed, their mother did not come to see them off — now that I summon the youngest, why does she come? The mother said: I beg leave to speak a few words, to explain myself. My first six sons had all attained the fruit of stream-entry; even had you, great king, ground those six bodies into dust, they would never have raised the slightest ill will, not so much as a single hair's worth. But this youngest son remains an ordinary being — though he cultivates goodness in body, he has not yet attained the fruit of the path. It is for this very reason that I am anxious for him: not yet having attained the path, he might lose his own resolve, and, fearing your royal command, cling to his own life, break the precept, and carry out the killing — and, his body destroyed, his life ended, fall down into Mount Tai Hell. It is out of love and concern for this son that I have come to see him now.

The king asked the mother further: did all six of your sons who died truly attain the fruit of stream-entry? She answered: all of them did. The king asked again: and you yourself, what fruit have you attained? The mother answered: I have attained the fruit of non-returner.

Hearing this, the king threw himself to the ground, crying out in anguish and self-reproach: I have planted the very root of grave transgression — with deliberate intent I have killed six stream-enterers! His own body and mind so afflicted that he could not sit still, he at once had incense, oil, and fragrant wood prepared, took up the six bodies, and cremated them, and raised six stūpas over their remains, offering worship there as recompense for their killing. Three times each day he performed repentance, wishing with his whole heart to dissolve his own transgression, and, as it gradually grew lighter, he further gave out his own wealth and provisions to support their aged mother. On each fast-day, he repeated his repentance again and again, hoping thereby to lessen his own offense, and be spared from hell (Source: Sūtra of Compassion and Non-Killing).

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The compendium offers no softening here: six stream-enterers are executed one after another for the same act of conscience, and the story's own resolution comes only after the fact, in the king's belated remorse rather than in any rescue. What distinguishes this entry from a simple martyrdom account is the mother's own reasoning when she brings her last, still-ordinary son before the same king — her grief is not for the six already safely beyond harm by their own attainment, but for the one still capable of being broken, a distinction the text draws with unusual precision between suffering that threatens only the body and suffering that threatens the precepts themselves.