Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
Someone who rebuts unprincipled statements with unprincipled statements, or principled statements with unprincipled statements, or a mix of both with unprincipled statements, delights only an unprincipled assembly cheering “he is truly astute!” — the real standard for good and bad principles is the familiar ten-factor path, not crowd approval.
A name that is also a claim
The wanderer's companion is not merely described as astute; he is literally named Paṇḍita, “Astute,” and credited with roughly five hundred prepared arguments — making the discourse's central question unusually pointed: does this person actually deserve the name he already carries?
Three ways to win a crowd without being right
The Buddha names three distinct debating tactics, each using unprincipled arguments as the weapon: against genuinely unprincipled statements, against genuinely principled statements, and against a mixture of both — and in every single case, an unprincipled audience roars its approval regardless of whether the rebuttal was actually sound.
Applause as the wrong measure entirely
The discourse's real target is not any specific wanderer but the standard itself: a crowd's noisy delight is shown to track nothing about the actual soundness of an argument, and the Buddha replaces it immediately with the one standard that does track soundness — the familiar ten-factor distinction between bad and good principles already met earlier in this chapter.
Key terms
The text
A wanderer's boast
§1Then the wanderer Ajita went up to the Buddha, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to the Buddha, “Worthy Gotama, we have a spiritual companion called ‘Astute’. He has worked out around five hundred arguments by which followers of other religions will know when they’ve been refuted.” Then the Buddha said to the mendicants, “Mendicants, do you remember this Astute’s points?” “Now is the time, Blessed One! Now is the time, Holy One! Let the Buddha speak and the mendicants will remember it.” “Well then, mendicants, listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.” “Yes, sir,” they replied. The Buddha said this:
Three ways to win a crowd without being right
§2“Mendicants, take a certain someone who rebuts and quashes unprincipled statements with unprincipled statements. This delights an unprincipled assembly, who make a colossal racket: ‘He is truly astute! He is truly astute!’ Someone else rebuts and quashes principled statements with unprincipled statements. This delights an unprincipled assembly, who make a colossal racket: ‘He is truly astute! He is truly astute!’ Someone else rebuts and quashes principled and unprincipled statements with unprincipled statements. This delights an unprincipled assembly, who make a colossal racket: ‘He is truly astute! He is truly astute!’
The real standard: bad and good principles
§3Mendicants, you should know bad principles and good principles. And you should know bad results and good results. Knowing these things, your practice should follow the good principles with good results. So what are bad principles? What are good principles? What are bad results? And what are good results? Wrong view is a bad principle. Right view is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong view are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right view are good results. Wrong purpose is a bad principle. Right purpose is a good principle. … Wrong speech is a bad principle. Right speech is a good principle. … Wrong action is a bad principle. Right action is a good principle. … Wrong livelihood is a bad principle. Right livelihood is a good principle. … Wrong effort is a bad principle. Right effort is a good principle. … Wrong mindfulness is a bad principle. Right mindfulness is a good principle. … Wrong immersion is a bad principle. Right immersion is a good principle. … Wrong knowledge is a bad principle. Right knowledge is a good principle. … Wrong freedom is a bad principle. Right freedom is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong freedom are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right freedom are good results. ‘You should know bad principles and good principles. And you should know bad results and good results. Knowing these things, your practice should follow the good principles with good results.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.”
Self-check quiz
5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.