Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.41

Dispute

Vivādasutta — Akkosavagga — the fifth chapter of the Tens, closing the First Fifty

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
Venerable Upāli questioning the Buddha
Form
A single question, a single ten-ground answer
Length
~1 minute to read
Chapter's namesake, or not
This chapter is titled Akkosavagga, the Chapter on Abuse, but “akkosa” appears nowhere in any of its ten discourses' actual content — an unexplained mismatch this guide notes rather than resolves
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — familiar ground for anyone who has read AN 10.37

Why this discourse

Upāli asks the most practical possible question about conflict in the Saṅgha: what actually causes it? The Buddha's answer is, word for word, the same five reversals — misrepresenting the teaching, the training, and the Realized One's words, practice, and prescriptions — already met defining schism in AN 10.37.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Fights, quarrels, arguments, and disputes in the Saṅgha trace back to a mendicant explaining the same five things wrongly: the teaching, the training, and what the Realized One said, practiced, and prescribed, each explained as its opposite.

The same list, a third time, reframed

This is not a new list: it is AN 10.37's ten grounds for schism, transplanted into a new question. Where AN 10.37 asked what counts as schism, this discourse asks what causes ordinary discord short of a full split — the same distortion, read at a smaller scale.

A puzzling chapter title

Unusually for this nipāta, the chapter this discourse opens is named for a word that does not occur in it: Akkosavagga, the Chapter on Abuse. None of the ten discourses that follow is actually about abuse or reviling, by title or by content; the source gives no explanation, and this guide records the mismatch rather than inventing one.

Setting up two more repeats

The same five-reversal list will appear again, nearly unchanged, in AN 10.42, before AN 10.43 finally varies the pattern with a genuinely different list of ten roots of dispute, this time about disciplinary offenses rather than doctrine.

Key terms

vivāda — “dispute” — this discourse's own title, the general condition AN 10.37 gives its extreme case (schism) a technical definition for.
bhaṇḍanajātā, kalahajātā — “fights, quarrels” — the concrete, unhappy symptoms Upāli asks the cause of.
bhikkhū ca na phāsu viharanti — “the mendicants don't live happily” — the practical cost of the same distortion that, at its extreme, constitutes schism.
bhaṇḍanakalahaviggahavivādā — “fights, quarrels, arguments, and disputes” — the compound naming, in one word, the full spectrum of Saṅgha discord Upāli asks about.
hetu, paccayo — “cause” and “reason” — the paired terms in Upāli's own question, echoed in the Buddha's answer.

The text

The discourse in full: Upāli's question, and the Buddha's answer. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Upāli's question

§1Then Venerable Upāli went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “What is the cause, sir, what is the reason, why fights, quarrels, arguments, and disputes arise in the Saṅgha, and the mendicants don’t live happily?”

The cause of dispute

§2“Upāli, it’s when a mendicant explains what is not the teaching as the teaching, and what is the teaching as not the teaching. They explain what is not the training as the training, and what is the training as not the training. They explain what was not spoken and stated by the Realized One as spoken and stated by the Realized One, and what was spoken and stated by the Realized One as not spoken and stated by the Realized One. They explain what was not practiced by the Realized One as practiced by the Realized One, and what was practiced by the Realized One as not practiced by the Realized One. They explain what was not prescribed by the Realized One as prescribed by the Realized One, and what was prescribed by the Realized One as not prescribed by the Realized One. This is the cause, this is the reason why fights, quarrels, arguments, and disputes arise in the Saṅgha, and the mendicants don’t live happily.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What does Upāli ask about in this discourse?
Correct: A. The practical root cause of ordinary Saṅgha conflict.
Question 2 of 6
How does the Buddha's answer compare to AN 10.37's definition of schism?
Correct: B. The identical list, reused for a related but broader question.
Question 3 of 6
According to the guide, what is puzzling about this chapter's title?
Correct: B. An honest, unresolved mismatch between the chapter's name and its actual content.
Question 4 of 6
What happens to this same list in the following two discourses, according to the guide?
Correct: B. One more repeat, then a real variation.
Question 5 of 6
What is described as the practical cost of this distortion, short of full schism?
Correct: B. Ordinary discord, distinct from the formal, extreme case of schism.
Question 6 of 6
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: D. No location is given, continuing this nipāta's pattern for the Upāli exchanges.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0