Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.53

Stagnation

Ṭhitisutta — Sacittavagga — the sixth chapter of the Tens, opening the Second Fifty

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
A three-way distinction, then the full mirror simile repeated from AN 10.51
Length
~2 minutes to read
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — new material followed by familiar ground

Why this discourse

Before returning to the now-familiar mirror simile, the Buddha first draws a precise three-way distinction the chapter has not made before: growth in skillful qualities is not the same as merely avoiding decline, and stagnation itself is neither.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A mendicant's qualities of faith, ethics, generosity, wisdom, and eloquence can decline, stagnate, or grow — three genuinely distinct conditions, only the third of which the Buddha praises — and the same mendicant should still check their own mind by the mirror simile already given.

A three-way distinction, not a simple pair

Where much of this project's material contrasts only two states (skillful/unskillful, decline/growth), this discourse insists on a middle term: qualities that neither decline nor grow are not automatically praised for avoiding decline — stagnation gets its own name and its own, distinctly unenthusiastic, treatment.

The mirror simile, folded in whole

After establishing this distinction, the discourse pivots directly into AN 10.51's mirror simile, reproduced here essentially in full — the two teachings are joined rather than merely juxtaposed, as if stagnation-avoidance is itself one more thing the self-check should catch.

Key terms

saddhā, sīla, cāga, paññā, paṭibhāna — faith, ethics, generosity, wisdom, and eloquence — the five qualities whose decline, stagnation, or growth this discourse examines.
hāni, ṭhiti, vuddhi — “decline, stagnation, growth” — the three-way distinction giving this discourse its title, ṭhiti.
neva tiṭṭhanti no vaḍḍhanti — “those qualities neither stagnate nor grow” — the phrasing defining decline, one of the three conditions this discourse distinguishes.
bahulaṁ viharāmi — “I often abide” — the recurring self-questioning frame of the mirror-simile checklist, repeated here from AN 10.51 and 10.52.
adhimatto chando — “extraordinary enthusiasm” — the urgency demanded once the fire simile is invoked, repeated unchanged from AN 10.51.

The text

The discourse in full: the three-way distinction, followed by the mirror simile repeated from AN 10.51. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Decline, stagnation, and growth

§1“Mendicants, I don’t praise stagnation in skillful qualities, let alone decline. I praise growth in skillful qualities, not stagnation or decline. And how is there decline in skillful qualities, not stagnation or growth? It’s when a mendicant has a certain degree of faith, ethics, generosity, wisdom, and eloquence. Those qualities neither stagnate nor grow in them. I call this decline in skillful qualities, not stagnation or growth. This is how there’s decline in skillful qualities, not stagnation or growth. And how is there stagnation in skillful qualities, not decline or growth? It’s when a mendicant has a certain degree of faith, ethics, generosity, wisdom, and eloquence. Those qualities neither decline nor grow in them. I call this stagnation in skillful qualities, not decline or growth. This is how there’s stagnation in skillful qualities, not decline or growth. And how is there growth in skillful qualities, not stagnation or decline? It’s when a mendicant has a certain degree of faith, ethics, generosity, wisdom, and eloquence. Those qualities neither stagnate nor decline in them. I call this growth in skillful qualities, not stagnation or decline. This is how there’s growth in skillful qualities, not stagnation or decline.

The mirror simile, repeated

§2If a mendicant isn’t skilled in encompassing another’s mind, then they should train themselves: ‘I will be skilled in encompassing my own mind.’ And how is a mendicant skilled in encompassing their own mind? Suppose there was a woman or man who was young, youthful, and fond of adornments, and they check their own reflection in a clean bright mirror or a clear bowl of water. If they see any dirt or blemish there, they’d try to remove it. But if they don’t see any dirt or blemish there, they’re happy with that, as they’ve got all they wished for: ‘How fortunate that I’m clean!’ In the same way, checking is very helpful for a mendicant’s skillful qualities. ‘Am I often covetous or not? Am I often malicious or not? Am I often overcome with dullness and drowsiness or not? Am I often restless or not? Am I often doubtful or not? Am I often irritable or not? Am I often defiled in mind or not? Am I often disturbed in body or not? Am I often energetic or not? Am I often immersed in samādhi or not?’ Suppose that, upon checking, a mendicant knows this: ‘I am often covetous, malicious, overcome with dullness and drowsiness, restless, doubtful, irritable, defiled in mind, disturbed in body, lazy, and not immersed in samādhi.’ In order to give up those bad, unskillful qualities, they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. Suppose your clothes or head were on fire. In order to extinguish it, you’d apply intense enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. In the same way, in order to give up those bad, unskillful qualities, that mendicant should apply extraordinary enthusiasm … But suppose that, upon checking, a mendicant knows this: ‘I am often content, kind-hearted, rid of dullness and drowsiness, calm, confident, loving, pure in mind, undisturbed in body, energetic, and immersed in samādhi.’ Grounded on those skillful qualities, they should practice meditation further to end the defilements.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What three-way distinction does this discourse draw?
Correct: B. A middle term, stagnation, distinct from both decline and growth.
Question 2 of 5
Which five qualities does this distinction apply to?
Correct: B. A set not identical to any prior five-item list in this project.
Question 3 of 5
How does this discourse relate to AN 10.51, according to the guide?
Correct: B. Two teachings joined into one discourse, not merely placed side by side.
Question 4 of 5
Which condition does the Buddha praise, according to this discourse?
Correct: C. Growth is praised; the Buddha explicitly states he does not praise mere stagnation, let alone decline.
Question 5 of 5
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: D. No location is given for this discourse.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0