Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.55

Decline

Parihānasutta — Sacittavagga — the sixth chapter of the Tens, opening the Second Fifty

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
Sāriputta, teaching at the mendicants' request
Form
A four-part definition, requested and given, then a positive-only mirror check with a three-tier response
Length
~2 minutes to read
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — two related but distinct teachings

Why this discourse

Sāriputta returns, this time explicitly invited to speak after raising a question the mendicants themselves ask him to answer: what defines an individual liable to decline? His answer then flows into yet another variant of the mirror simile, this one checking only for the presence of good qualities.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

An individual liable to decline fails to hear new teachings, forgets what they've heard, neglects familiar teachings, and fails to understand what was unclear; one not liable to decline does the opposite — and every mendicant should further check their own mind for ten positive qualities, responding according to how many are found.

A formally requested teaching

Unlike Sāriputta's unprompted address in AN 10.52, this discourse opens with the mendicants explicitly asking him to clarify a question about the Buddha's own teaching — a small but real difference in how the same disciple's authority to speak is established from one discourse to the next.

A third variant of the checklist

This discourse's mirror-simile check differs from both AN 10.51's ten paired items and AN 10.54's two items: it lists ten purely positive qualities (contentment, kind-heartedness, freedom from dullness, calm, confidence, love, purity of mind, joy in the teaching, serenity, and discernment) and asks only whether each is present, not paired against its negative.

A three-tier response, not two

Where AN 10.51's check branches into two responses (found wanting, or grounded and ready to continue), this version adds a middle case: a mendicant may see none of the ten qualities, some of them, or all of them, with a distinct instruction for each — the most granular version of this recurring self-check structure so far.

Key terms

parihānadhamma — “liable to decline” — this discourse's own title, the individual type defined in its opening section.
assutaṁ dhammaṁ na suṇāti — “doesn't get to hear a teaching they haven't heard before” — the first of four marks of decline.
dhammapāmojja — “joy with the teaching” — a quality appearing in this discourse's checklist that did not appear in AN 10.51's.
sutā cassa dhammā sammosaṁ gacchanti — “they forget those teachings they have heard” — the second of the four marks of decline.
santuṭṭho, mettacitto — “contentment, loving” — two of the ten positive qualities in this discourse's own variant checklist.

The text

The discourse in full: the mendicants' request, Sāriputta's definition of decline, and the positive-only mirror check. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

A question, requested and answered

§1There Sāriputta addressed the mendicants: “Reverends, mendicants!” “Reverend,” they replied. Sāriputta said this: “Reverends, they speak of an individual liable to decline, and one not liable to decline. But how did the Buddha define an individual liable to decline, and one not liable to decline?” “Reverend, we would travel a long way to learn the meaning of this statement in the presence of Venerable Sāriputta. May Venerable Sāriputta himself please clarify the meaning of this. The mendicants will listen and remember it.” “Then listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.” “Yes, reverend,” they replied. Sāriputta said this:

Liable to decline, and not liable to decline

§2“How did the Buddha define an individual liable to decline? It’s when a mendicant doesn’t get to hear a teaching they haven’t heard before. They forget those teachings they have heard. They don’t keep exercising the teachings with which they are already familiar. And they don’t come to understand what they haven’t understood before. That’s how the Buddha defined an individual liable to decline. And how did the Buddha define an individual not liable to decline? It’s when a mendicant gets to hear a teaching they haven’t heard before. They remember those teachings they have heard. They keep exercising the teachings with which they are already familiar. And they come to understand what they haven’t understood before. That’s how the Buddha defined an individual not liable to decline.

The mirror simile, ten positive qualities

§3If a mendicant isn’t skilled in encompassing another’s mind, then they should train themselves: ‘I will be skilled in encompassing my own mind.’ And how is a mendicant skilled in encompassing their own mind? Suppose there was a woman or man who was young, youthful, and fond of adornments, and they check their own reflection in a clean bright mirror or a clear bowl of water. If they see any dirt or blemish there, they’d try to remove it. But if they don’t see any dirt or blemish there, they’re happy with that, as they’ve got all they wished for: ‘How fortunate that I’m clean!’ In the same way, checking is very helpful for a mendicant’s skillful qualities. ‘Is contentment often found in me or not? Is kind-heartedness often found in me or not? Is freedom from dullness and drowsiness often found in me or not? Is calm often found in me or not? Is confidence often found in me or not? Is love often found in me or not? Is purity of mind often found in me or not? Is internal joy with the teaching found in me or not? Is internal serenity of heart found in me or not? Is the higher wisdom of discernment of principles found in me or not?’

Three branching responses

§4Suppose a mendicant, while checking, doesn’t see any of these skillful qualities in themselves. In order to get them they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. Suppose your clothes or head were on fire. In order to extinguish it, you’d apply intense enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. In the same way, they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm to get those skillful qualities … Suppose a mendicant, while checking, sees some of these skillful qualities in themselves, but doesn’t see others. Grounded on the skillful qualities they see, they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness in order to get the skillful qualities they don’t see. Suppose your clothes or head were on fire. In order to extinguish it, you’d apply intense enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. In the same way, grounded on the skillful qualities they see, they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm to get those skillful qualities they don’t see. But suppose a mendicant, while checking, sees all of these skillful qualities in themselves. Grounded on all these skillful qualities they should practice meditation further to end the defilements.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
How does this discourse's opening differ from AN 10.52's, according to the guide?
Correct: B. A formally requested teaching, distinct from AN 10.52's unprompted address.
Question 2 of 5
What four marks define an individual liable to decline?
Correct: B. A definition centered entirely on engagement with the teaching.
Question 3 of 5
How does this discourse's mirror-simile checklist differ from AN 10.51's, according to the guide?
Correct: B. A third distinct variant of the recurring checklist structure.
Question 4 of 5
How many response tiers does this version of the check offer, compared to AN 10.51's two?
Correct: B. A more granular branching structure than the earlier versions.
Question 5 of 5
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: D. No location is given for this discourse.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0