Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
A mendicant can gain a state of immersion beyond every ordinary object of perception — the elements, the formless dimensions, either world, anything sensed — and yet still perceive, by perceiving only the peace of nibbāna: the stilling of all activities and the ending of craving.
The same question, a different questioner
This is the identical question and answer already met at AN 11.7, but with the asker changed from Ānanda alone to ‘several mendicants’ unnamed, and the follow-up dialogue with Sāriputta from AN 11.7 dropped entirely — the shortest and plainest of this chapter's four variations on the theme.
A four-part set closing this chapter
This discourse opens a set of four that will close chapter 2: mendicants ask the Buddha (this discourse), the Buddha volunteers the same teaching to the mendicants unprompted (AN 11.19), mendicants ask Sāriputta (AN 11.20), and Sāriputta volunteers it to the mendicants unprompted (AN 11.21) — a structural chiasm testing the same content across every combination of asker and teacher.
Why the repetition matters
Read as a set, these four short discourses make the same point AN 11.7 made through two direct witnesses (Buddha and Sāriputta): whether prompted or volunteered, asked of the Buddha or of a senior disciple, this teaching about immersion beyond perception is delivered identically every time, underscoring that it describes a fixed reality rather than a personal formulation.
Key terms
The text
Several mendicants ask, and the Buddha answers
§1And then several mendicants went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Could it be, sir, that a mendicant might gain a state of immersion like this? They wouldn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And they wouldn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. They wouldn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And they wouldn’t perceive what is seen, heard, thought, known, attained, sought, or explored by the mind. And yet they would still perceive.” “It could be, mendicants.” “But how could this be?” “It’s when a mendicant perceives: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ That’s how a mendicant might gain a state of immersion like this. They wouldn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And they wouldn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. They wouldn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And they wouldn’t perceive what is seen, heard, thought, known, attained, sought, or explored by the mind. And yet they would still perceive.”
Self-check quiz
6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.