Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.12

Ethics

Sīlasutta — Caravagga — the second chapter of the Fours

Setting
None stated; the Caravagga gives no location, and each discourse is addressed to the mendicants directly
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
An instruction, a question, the answer in four postures, and three verses
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
The ethics-then-what sequence is standard across the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — one memorable question and a familiar list

Why this discourse

“When you’ve done this, what more is there to do?” The question is asked immediately after the fullest statement of monastic ethical discipline in the collection — precepts, code, conduct, alms, seeing danger in the slightest fault — and it is not rhetorical. The answer takes up the rest of the discourse, and it says: the hindrances, in every posture. Ethics is where the discourse starts and the first place it declines to stop.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Complete ethical discipline is the beginning of the work rather than the end of it, and what follows is the five hindrances given up in all four postures.

The opening formula

The first paragraph is one of the canon’s standard blocks: live by the precepts and the monastic code, restrained in the code, conducting yourselves well, resorting for alms in suitable places, seeing danger in the slightest fault, keeping the rules undertaken.

Read as a unit it is deliberately comprehensive. It covers what is prohibited (pātimokkha), how one behaves (ācāragocara), where one goes, and the attitude brought to the whole (aṇumattesu vajjesu bhayadassāvī, seeing danger in the slightest fault). Nothing about outward conduct is left unaddressed, which is what makes the question that follows carry weight.

The question

Kimassa uttari karaṇīyaṁ — what is to be done beyond this? The force of the question depends entirely on the completeness of what precedes it. Someone who has done all of that has, by any ordinary reckoning, finished.

The collection asks this question in several places and the answer is always the same in shape: ethics is not a lower stage that is passed through and left, but it is also not sufficient. Here the answer is the hindrances — that is, the mind. Outward conduct can be complete while the mind is still occupied, and the discourse simply moves the subject inward without disparaging what came before.

The five hindrances, and the five positives

The list given is the standard five: desire, ill will, dullness and drowsiness, restlessness and remorse, doubt. But the discourse pairs their removal with four positive conditions, and those are the part usually skipped: energy roused up and unflagging, mindfulness established and lucid, body tranquil and undisturbed, mind immersed in samādhi.

The pairing matters. The hindrances are named as things given up; the four conditions are named as things present. A description of practice that only lists what is absent leaves a reader without a way to tell progress from numbness, and this discourse supplies the missing half.

Back to the postures

The four postures return unchanged from AN 4.11, and the label at the end of each is identical: keen and prudent, always energetic and resolute. The two discourses are built on the same frame with different content dropped into it — three bad thoughts there, five hindrances here.

Read side by side they make the chapter’s method visible. The Aṅguttara composes by substitution: one template, many fillings. A reader who has grasped one of these two discourses has effectively read the other, and the collection expects exactly that economy of attention from a reciter.

The verses

The verses go somewhere the prose did not. Above, below, all round, as far as the planet extends; they scrutinize the rise and fall of phenomena such as the aggregates. That is insight practice, not hindrance-removal, and it is introduced without transition.

The first verse stays with the postures and adds the small movements — bending and extending the limbs — which is a nod to the mindfulness of the body as taught in the Satipaṭṭhāna material. The third closes with always determined, satataṁ pahitatto.

Taken together the three verses sketch a fuller path than the prose asks for: conduct, then continuous mindfulness, then contemplation of arising and passing. Verses in this collection often carry material the prose has not earned, and it is more honest to notice that than to read the extra content back into the prose.

Key terms

pātimokkha — “the monastic code” — the recited list of training rules, and the first item of the opening formula.
ācāragocara — “conduct and resort” — how one behaves and where one goes for alms; the part of the formula about a life lived in public.
aṇumattesu vajjesu bhayadassāvī — “seeing danger in the slightest fault” — the attitude the formula asks for, and the phrase that makes it more than compliance.
nīvaraṇa — “hindrance” — the five given up here: desire, ill will, dullness and drowsiness, restlessness and remorse, and doubt.
pahitatta — “determined, resolute”, literally ‘one whose self is sent forth’ — the closing word of the verses.

The text

The discourse in full: the ethical formula, the question, the four postures, and the three verses. The ellipses are the Pāli’s own abbreviation. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Ethics, and the question

§1“Mendicants, live by the ethical precepts and the monastic code. Live restrained in the monastic code, conducting yourselves well and resorting for alms in suitable places. Seeing danger in the slightest fault, keep the rules you’ve undertaken. When you’ve done this, what more is there to do?

The hindrances in four postures

§2Suppose a mendicant has got rid of desire and ill will while walking, and has given up dullness and drowsiness, restlessness and remorse, and doubt. Their energy is roused up and unflagging, their mindfulness is established and lucid, their body is tranquil and undisturbed, and their mind is immersed in samādhi. Such a mendicant is said to be ‘keen and prudent, always energetic and resolute’ when walking.

§3Suppose a mendicant has got rid of desire and ill will while standing … sitting … and when lying down while awake, and has given up dullness and drowsiness, restlessness and remorse, and doubt. Their energy is roused up and unflagging, their mindfulness is established and lucid, their body is tranquil and undisturbed, and their mind is immersed in samādhi and unified. Such a mendicant is said to be ‘keen and prudent, always energetic and resolute’ when lying down while awake.

The verses

§4Carefully walking, carefully standing, carefully sitting, carefully lying; a mendicant carefully bends their limbs, and carefully extends them.

§5Above, below, all round, as far as the planet extends; they scrutinize the rise and fall of phenomena such as the aggregates.

§6Training in what leads to serenity of heart, always staying mindful; they call such a mendicant ‘always determined’.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What question does the discourse ask after the ethical formula?
Correct: B. And it is not rhetorical — the answer takes up the rest of the discourse.
Question 2 of 10
Why does the question carry weight?
Correct: B. Nothing about outward conduct is left unaddressed.
Question 3 of 10
What does the opening formula cover?
Correct: B. Code, conduct, resort, and seeing danger in the slightest fault.
Question 4 of 10
What is the answer to the question?
Correct: B. The discourse moves the subject inward without disparaging what came before.
Question 5 of 10
What are the four positive conditions paired with the hindrances’ removal?
Correct: B. The part usually skipped.
Question 6 of 10
Why does the guide say that pairing matters?
Correct: B. The discourse supplies the missing half.
Question 7 of 10
How does this discourse relate to AN 4.11?
Correct: B. The Aṅguttara composes by substitution: one template, many fillings.
Question 8 of 10
What do the small movements in the first verse allude to?
Correct: B. A nod beyond what the prose asked for.
Question 9 of 10
What do the verses add that the prose does not have?
Correct: B. Introduced without transition.
Question 10 of 10
How does the guide recommend handling that?
Correct: B. More honest than harmonizing the two.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0