Ru-Yi Meditation Center
Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.136

Ethics (1st)

Paṭhamasīlasutta — Puggalavagga — the fourteenth chapter of the Fours

Setting
None stated; the Puggalavagga gives no location for this discourse, and it is addressed to the mendicants directly
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
A four-rung ladder, stated once, with no definitions
Length
under a minute to read
Northern parallel
The threefold training and its graded fulfillment are common to the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — four lines, and the interesting part is the shape rather than the content

Why this discourse

Ethics, immersion, wisdom — and four individuals: one who has fulfilled none of the three, one who has fulfilled the first, one the first two, one all three. What makes this worth a page is what the shape rules out. There is no cell here for wisdom without ethics, or immersion without ethics, and in a chapter built almost entirely out of grids that absence is a decision.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

The threefold training is filled out in order, and people can be sorted by how far along they have got.

A ladder, not a grid

AN 4.132 crossed two qualities and got four cells. AN 4.134 did the same. This discourse has three variables and could in principle produce eight combinations; it produces four.

The four are strictly cumulative: none, the first, the first two, all three. Every other combination — wisdom without immersion, immersion without ethics, wisdom without either — is simply not offered.

That is the discourse’s whole content, and it is a strong claim made by arrangement rather than by argument. The order of the three is not a preference. It is being treated as the only order in which they occur.

It is worth being precise about what is and is not being asserted. The discourse does not say a person without ethics can have no concentration at all; it says nothing about such a person, because the classification has no room for them. Silence produced by a grid’s shape is weaker evidence than a statement, and should be reported as what it is.

The word that is doing the work

Paripūrakārī, one who fulfills, one who does the filling-full. The image is of completing something rather than of possessing it.

That matters for reading the first rung. Somebody who has not fulfilled ethics is not thereby unethical — they have not finished. The discourse is describing completion of a training, not the presence or absence of a quality.

Read that way the four rungs stop looking like a hierarchy of persons and start looking like a progress report, which is closer to what the vocabulary supports.

The three terms themselves are the ones the Fours opened with. AN 4.1 named noble ethics, immersion, wisdom, and freedom as the four whose non-understanding kept everyone wandering. Here the fourth term is dropped and the first three are made into a ladder.

Why it is paired with AN 4.137

The next discourse is this one with a single change: instead of fulfilling ethics, immersion, and wisdom, the individual values and submits to them.

Neither discourse says anything about the other, and neither is complete without it. Taken together they distinguish two things that ordinary language runs into one: doing the training, and treating the training as authoritative.

The chapter has done this before. AN 4.123 and AN 4.124 were a matched pair with one clause swapped; so were AN 4.125 and AN 4.126 in the chapter before. The collection argues by minimal variation, and a reader who takes these discourses one at a time will miss most of what is being said.

The practical question the pair raises is the useful one: a person can have fulfilled more than they honor, or honor more than they have fulfilled, and the two failures look nothing alike.

What the ladder is for

Nothing in the discourse tells anyone to climb it. There is no encouragement, no warning, and no destination attached to any rung.

This is the fourth discourse in a row of which that is true, and by now it should be read as the chapter’s style rather than as an omission in any one text. The Puggalavagga classifies and does not exhort.

What the classification supplies is a diagnostic order. If ethics, immersion, and wisdom are filled out in sequence, then a difficulty at a later stage is worth investigating at an earlier one — and that is a genuinely useful instruction, even though the discourse never states it.

The Fours give the same order elsewhere with more attached. AN 4.12 sets out what living by ethics looks like in every posture; AN 4.92 to AN 4.94 sort people by serenity and discernment and do tell them what to do about it. This page is the bare skeleton those pages put flesh on.

Where it sits

Sixth of the chapter’s ten, first of the matched pair, and the point at which the Puggalavagga stops crossing variables and starts stacking them.

AN 4.137 completes the pair. AN 4.138 returns to the grid form with body and mind. AN 4.139 and AN 4.140 close the chapter on speech.

Four discourses to go, and three of them are grids again.

Key terms

paripūrakārī — “one who fulfills”, one who fills something full — an image of completion rather than of possession.
sīla — “ethics” — first rung, and in this scheme the one without which the others are not classified at all.
samādhi — “immersion” — second rung; the collectedness of mind that the training builds on ethics.
paññā — “wisdom” — third rung, and the last named here; AN 4.1 added freedom as a fourth, which this discourse does not.
sikkhā — “training” — not used here, but the standard name for the set of three this discourse grades.

The text

The discourse in full: four individuals, four rungs, no definitions. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Four individuals

§1“Mendicants, these four individuals are found in the world. What four? One individual has not fulfilled ethics, immersion, or wisdom.

§2One individual has fulfilled ethics, but not immersion or wisdom.

§3One individual has fulfilled ethics and immersion, but not wisdom.

§4One individual has fulfilled ethics, immersion, and wisdom. These are the four individuals found in the world.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What three things are graded?
Correct: B. The first three of the four AN 4.1 opened the Fours with.
Question 2 of 10
How many combinations could three variables produce, and how many does the discourse give?
Correct: B. The four are strictly cumulative.
Question 3 of 10
Which combination is not offered?
Correct: B. A strong claim made by arrangement rather than by argument.
Question 4 of 10
How does the guide characterize that silence?
Correct: B. The discourse says nothing about such a person because the classification has no room for them.
Question 5 of 10
What does paripūrakārī mean?
Correct: B. Someone who has not fulfilled ethics is not thereby unethical.
Question 6 of 10
How does that change the reading of the four rungs?
Correct: B. Closer to what the vocabulary supports.
Question 7 of 10
What does AN 4.137 change?
Correct: B. Two things ordinary language runs into one: doing the training, and treating it as authoritative.
Question 8 of 10
What method does the guide say the collection is using here?
Correct: B. A reader who takes these discourses one at a time will miss most of what is said.
Question 9 of 10
What useful instruction does the ladder imply without stating?
Correct: B. A diagnostic order, supplied by the sequence.
Question 10 of 10
What does the guide say about the chapter’s refusal to exhort?
Correct: B. The fourth discourse in a row of which that is true.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0

Further reading

← PreviousAN 4.135 · Blameworthy