Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.149

Good Conduct

Sucaritasutta — Ābhāvagga — the fifteenth chapter of the Fours

Setting
None stated; the Ābhāvagga gives no location for this discourse, and it is addressed to the mendicants directly
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
AN 4.148 inverted, item by item
Length
under a minute to read
Northern parallel
The four kinds of right speech are among the most widely attested lists in the early collections; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — four words, and the fourth is not the negation the other three are

Why this discourse

True speech, harmonious speech, gentle speech, thoughtful speech. Three of the four are the exact opposites of the four kinds of bad speech in the discourse before — and the fourth is not. Against nonsense the Pāli sets mantabhāsā, speech with judgment in it, which is a positive requirement rather than the absence of a fault.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Speech goes right in four ways, and three of them are simply the four faults reversed.

Three negations and one addition

Saccavācā, true speech, is the opposite of musāvāda. Apisuṇā vācā, non-divisive speech, is literally the same word as the fault with a negative prefix. Saṇhā vācā, gentle or smooth speech, is the opposite of pharusā, rough.

Then the fourth. Against samphappalāpa, idle chatter, the Pāli does not put ‘non-chatter’. It puts mantabhāsā, speech made with mantā — a word for wisdom, counsel, considered judgment.

Sujato renders it ‘thoughtful’. The construction is worth pointing out because it changes what the item asks for. The other three can be satisfied by refraining. This one cannot: it requires something to be brought to the speech, not merely something to be kept out of it.

So the list has an asymmetry, and it is in the same position as the asymmetry in the list of faults. AN 4.148’s fourth item was the one that named no victim; AN 4.149’s fourth item is the one that names no fault. The two lists tilt in the same place.

Why the positive list is necessary

A prohibition can always be satisfied by doing nothing. Four rules against speaking badly are, taken alone, fully obeyed by anyone who says nothing at all, and a tradition that valued silence as much as this one does could easily have left it there.

It did not. The positive list requires speech that is true, that holds people together, that is gentle, and that has judgment in it — none of which is available to someone who has simply stopped talking.

That is the reason to teach these two discourses as one unit rather than as a pair of lists. The first says what to stop; the second makes clear that stopping is not the goal.

The Fours have made the same move elsewhere on a larger scale. AN 4.121’s four fears each end not with bad conduct given up but with bad conduct given up and good conduct developed. The pattern is consistent enough to be called a policy.

‘Harmonious’, and what it asks

The second item deserves a second look, because the English can sound weaker than the Pāli. Apisuṇā vācā is not merely speech that avoids gossip. Its counterpart was defined by an action — carrying what was said here to people there in order to divide them — so its negation is speech that does the reverse: it brings people together.

The standard fuller descriptions elsewhere say exactly that: hearing something here, the person does not repeat it there to divide; they reconcile those who have broken apart, encourage those who are united, and delight in concord.

None of that is in this discourse, which gives one word. But the word carries it, and a teacher can say so while being clear about where the detail comes from.

It is the one of the four whose scope is a group rather than an individual, and in a collection that spends this much time on community — four assemblies, the conditions for non-decline, the four ways of drawing people in — that is not incidental.

What is still absent

Two things this list does not include, both of which appear in fuller treatments elsewhere.

Timeliness. The standard description of a Realized One’s speech includes speaking at the right time, and there is nothing about timing here.

Benefit. The same fuller descriptions require speech to be connected with the goal, and mantabhāsā gestures at that without stating it.

Noting the absences is not a criticism of the discourse. It is a reminder of what a numbered collection is doing: preserving a set at the size the number allows. Four items are what fits in the Fours, and the additional qualifications are kept where there is room for them.

Where it sits

Ninth of the chapter’s ten, and the last of its three matched pairs.

AN 4.150 closes the Ābhāvagga with the four essentials, and closes it by returning to the four terms the whole nipāta began with at AN 4.1.

After that the Fours move to the Indriyavagga, the chapter of faculties, and to a run of discourses on faith, energy, mindfulness, and wisdom as the powers of a practicing life.

Key terms

vacīsucarita — “good conduct by way of speech” — the positive counterpart of AN 4.148’s heading, with the same four subdivisions inverted.
saccavācā — “true speech” — the plain opposite of false speech, and the only one of the four that has a precept behind it.
apisuṇā vācā — “harmonious speech” — literally non-divisive; its fuller descriptions make it speech that reconciles and unites.
saṇhā vācā — “gentle speech” — smooth, soft; the opposite of rough, and about how the speech lands rather than how it was meant.
mantabhāsā — “thoughtful speech” — speech made with mantā, wisdom or considered judgment; the one item that requires something added rather than withheld.

The text

The discourse in full: four kinds of good verbal conduct, named. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Four kinds of good conduct by way of speech

§1“Mendicants, there are these four kinds of good conduct by way of speech. What four? Speech that’s true, harmonious, gentle, and thoughtful. These are the four kinds of good conduct by way of speech.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What are the four?
Correct: B. Three of them invert AN 4.148 item by item.
Question 2 of 10
Which item is not a simple negation of its counterpart?
Correct: B. The Pāli does not put ‘non-chatter’.
Question 3 of 10
What does that asymmetry change?
Correct: B. AN 4.148’s fourth named no victim; AN 4.149’s names no fault.
Question 4 of 10
Why does the guide say a positive list is necessary?
Correct: B. The tradition did not leave it there.
Question 5 of 10
Where else in the Fours does the same policy appear?
Correct: B. Consistent enough to be called a policy.
Question 6 of 10
What does apisuṇā vācā ask for, on the fuller descriptions?
Correct: B. Its counterpart was defined by an action, so its negation reverses that action.
Question 7 of 10
How does the guide handle that fuller content?
Correct: B. This discourse gives one word.
Question 8 of 10
Which of the four has a group rather than an individual as its scope?
Correct: B. Not incidental in a collection that spends this much time on community.
Question 9 of 10
What two qualifications appear elsewhere but not here?
Correct: B. Mantabhāsā gestures at the second without stating it.
Question 10 of 10
How does the guide explain those absences?
Correct: B. Four items are what fits in the Fours.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0