Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
A decision can be corrupted in four ways: by who you like, who you dislike, what you have not understood, and what you are afraid of.
The four terms
Chanda, desire or preference, rendered here as favoritism — deciding for someone because they are yours. Dosa, hatred, as hostility — deciding against someone because of a grudge. Moha, delusion, as stupidity — deciding wrongly because you did not grasp the matter. Bhaya, fear, as cowardice — deciding to avoid a consequence to yourself.
The collective term is agati, literally ‘not-going’ or a wrong course. The image is of a path departed from: a decision has a proper route, and these are the four ways off it.
It is a well-built list. The first two are partiality in both directions, positive and negative. The third is failure of competence rather than of will. The fourth is self-interest of a particular kind — not gain but the avoidance of cost. Between them they cover corruption by affection, by grudge, by incapacity, and by pressure, and it is genuinely hard to name a fifth.
Stupidity is on the list
The inclusion of moha is the part most worth pausing on. Three of the four are faults of motive; one is a fault of understanding. The list makes no distinction between them in its consequences.
That is a demanding standard and a fair one. A decision made in good faith by someone who did not do the work of understanding the case is on this list alongside a bribed one. The person harmed is harmed either way, and the discourse declines to grade by intention.
It also connects this list to the rest of the collection. AN 4.3, thirteen discourses earlier, made exactly this point about praise and criticism: the fault is not the wrong verdict but the missing examination. Here the same principle is applied to office.
The moon
The verse says that one who acts against the teaching in these four ways has their fame fade like the moon in the waning fortnight.
The image is well chosen for the subject. A waning moon is not extinguished by an event; it diminishes on a schedule, visibly, a little each night, and everyone watching can see which way it is going. Reputation lost to partiality behaves the same way. Nobody announces it and everybody notices.
AN 4.18 supplies the waxing half, and the two verses are meant to be held together.
Why four discourses
AN 4.17 gives the negative list. AN 4.18 gives the positive. AN 4.19 gives both in one discourse with both verses. AN 4.20 applies the same four to a particular monastic officer.
This is not padding, and it is not accident. The Aṅguttara is arranged for recitation, and a set of short discourses in negative, positive, combined, and applied forms is a complete teaching unit for a reciter — four ways of holding one list. A modern reader who finds the repetition tedious is encountering a genuine feature of an oral collection rather than a defect in it.
Key terms
The text
Four prejudiced decisions
§1“Mendicants, there are these four ways of making prejudiced decisions. What four? Making decisions prejudiced by favoritism, hostility, stupidity, and cowardice. These are the four ways of making prejudiced decisions.
The verse
§2If you act against the teaching out of favoritism, hostility, cowardice, or stupidity, your fame fades away, like the moon in the waning fortnight.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.