Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.236

Training Rules (2nd)

Dutiyasikkhāpadasutta — Kammavagga — the twenty-fourth chapter of the Fours

Setting
None stated; the Kammavagga gives no location for this discourse, and it is addressed to the mendicants directly
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
The four kinds of deeds, with dark deeds defined by the five gravest offenses and bright deeds by an unrelated positive list
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
The five heinous offenses (ānantarika-kamma) are widespread across Buddhist traditions; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — the pairing is worth noticing for what does not mirror

Why this discourse

Where AN 4.235 paired the five precepts cleanly with their own negations, this discourse does something less tidy: it defines dark deeds as the five gravest offenses the tradition recognizes — killing one’s mother, one’s father, or an arahant; wounding a Buddha with intent to kill; causing schism in the Saṅgha — and then pairs them with bright deeds that are not their opposite in any straightforward sense, but an ordinary list of good conduct and right view.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

The five gravest offenses a person can commit are a dark deed with a dark result; ordinary good conduct and right view are the bright deed set against them, within the same fourfold framework.

The five worst crimes named

Matricide, patricide, killing an arahant, maliciously wounding a Realized One, and causing a schism in the Saṅgha — the ānantarika-kamma, the ‘deeds with immediate result’, so called because the tradition holds they ripen without delay, in the very next life, foreclosing any intervening rebirth. This discourse names all five together as its single dark deed.

These are not drawn from the ten courses of action or the five precepts. They form their own, older category, reserved in the tradition for offenses considered uniquely severe — against the two people to whom a person owes their existence, against a fully liberated being, against the founder of the teaching, and against the community that carries it forward.

A pairing that does not mirror

Bright deeds, defined against this list, are not stated as the absence of the five worst crimes. There is no straightforward positive counterpart to not committing matricide the way not killing pairs with the first precept. Instead the discourse gives an ordinary ethical description: not killing, stealing, or committing sexual misconduct; not using false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical speech; being content, kind-hearted, and holding right view.

This asymmetry is worth stating plainly rather than smoothing over. Unlike AN 4.235, where dark and bright were exact negations of one list, this discourse sets an extreme, narrow category of catastrophic wrongdoing against a broad, ordinary description of decent conduct. The two halves of the tetrad are not mirror images; they are simply the worst thing named on one side and a reasonable life named on the other.

Why the asymmetry may not be a flaw

One way to read this is as a gap in the discourse’s design. Another is to read it as accurate to how these two categories actually relate. The five worst crimes are vanishingly rare and, in the tradition’s own account, close off certain paths entirely regardless of what else a person does; ordinary decent conduct is what everyone else’s life actually consists of. Pairing a rare catastrophe with an ordinary life, rather than manufacturing an artificial mirror-virtue for each catastrophic act, may simply reflect that these two things are not symmetrical in reality either.

Key terms

ānantarika-kamma — “deeds with immediate result” — the five gravest offenses, held to ripen without delay in the very next life.
mātughāta / pitughāta — matricide and patricide — the first two of the five, against those to whom a person owes their existence.
arahantaghāta — killing an arahant, a fully liberated being — the third of the five.
lohituppāda — maliciously drawing the blood of a Realized One — wounding a Buddha with intent to kill, the fourth of the five.
saṅghabheda — causing a schism in the Saṅgha — the fifth, against the community that carries the teaching forward.

The text

The discourse in full: the four kinds of deeds, with the five worst crimes and an unrelated positive list defining the first two. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The four kinds of deeds

§1“Mendicants, I declare these four kinds of deeds, having realized them with my own insight. What four? There are dark deeds with dark results; bright deeds with bright results; dark and bright deeds with dark and bright results; and neither dark nor bright deeds with neither dark nor bright results, which lead to the ending of deeds.

Dark deeds: the five worst crimes

§2And what are dark deeds with dark results? It’s when someone murders their mother or father or a perfected one. They maliciously shed the blood of a Realized One. Or they cause a schism in the Saṅgha. These are called dark deeds with dark results.

Bright deeds: ordinary good conduct

§3And what are bright deeds with bright results? It’s when someone doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, or commit sexual misconduct. They don’t use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re content, kind-hearted, with right view. These are called bright deeds with bright results.

The remaining two kinds

§4And what are dark and bright deeds with dark and bright results? It’s when someone makes both hurtful and pleasing choices by way of body, speech, and mind. These are called dark and bright deeds with dark and bright results. And what are neither dark nor bright deeds with neither dark nor bright results, which lead to the ending of deeds? It’s the intention to give up dark deeds with dark results, bright deeds with bright results, and both dark and bright deeds with both dark and bright results. These are called neither dark nor bright deeds with neither dark nor bright results, which lead to the ending of deeds. These are the four kinds of deeds that I declare, having realized them with my own insight.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What five offenses define dark deeds in this discourse?
Correct: B. The ānantarika-kamma, the five gravest offenses the tradition recognizes.
Question 2 of 10
Why are these five called ānantarika-kamma?
Correct: B. Foreclosing any intervening rebirth.
Question 3 of 10
How does this discourse's bright-deed definition relate to its dark-deed definition?
Correct: B. An asymmetric pairing, unlike AN 4.235's clean mirror of the five precepts.
Question 4 of 10
What does the guide say about this asymmetry?
Correct: B. A rare catastrophe paired with an ordinary life, rather than a manufactured mirror-virtue.
Question 5 of 10
What discourse gives a cleanly mirrored pairing, by contrast?
Correct: B. Exact negations of one list, unlike this discourse's asymmetric pairing.
Question 6 of 10
What does saṅghabheda mean?
Correct: B. The fifth of the five gravest offenses.
Question 7 of 10
What kind of speech does this discourse's bright-deed list exclude?
Correct: B. The same fourfold division of bad verbal conduct met earlier at AN 4.148 and AN 4.221.
Question 8 of 10
What framework structures this discourse?
Correct: B. Continued from the discourses immediately before it in this chapter.
Question 9 of 10
Against whom are the first two of the five gravest offenses committed?
Correct: B. Matricide and patricide, the first two of the five.
Question 10 of 10
How are the mixed and ending kinds of deed defined in this discourse?
Correct: B. Unchanged, as at AN 4.235.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0