Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.36

Doṇa

Doṇasutta — Cakkavagga — the fourth chapter of the Fours

Setting
On the road between Ukkaṭṭhā and Setavyā, and then at the root of a tree beside it
Speakers
The Buddha and Doṇa the brahmin
Form
A narrative approach, four questions with four refusals, a lotus simile, and two verses
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
The Doṇa episode is well represented in the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — famous, short, and turning entirely on a verb tense

Why this discourse

One of the best-known exchanges in the canon. A brahmin sees footprints marked with thousand-spoked wheels, follows them, and asks the man sitting at the tree whether he is a god, a centaur, a spirit, or a human. Four questions, four refusals — and the refusal is in the future tense. Everything interesting about this discourse is in that tense, and most retellings lose it.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Asked what kind of being he is, the Buddha answers that he will not become any of them, because the defilements that would produce such a rebirth are gone.

The footprints

Doṇa sees the wheel-marks and concludes these could not be a human being’s. That is the premise of the whole conversation: he has already decided the answer is not ‘human’ before he asks anything.

The wheel on the sole is one of the thirty-two marks of a great man, a piece of brahminical lore the canon repeatedly puts in the mouths of brahmins. It is worth noting that the text does not argue for the marks; it uses them as the reason a brahmin gets interested, which is a slightly different thing from asserting them.

What Doṇa then finds is described carefully, and the description is not marvellous: sitting cross-legged, body straight, mindfulness present, faculties peaceful, self-controlled, like a tamed elephant. The extraordinary sign leads to an ordinary posture, and the discourse spends more words on the composure than on the miracle.

The verb

“Might you be a god?” — “I will not be a god, brahmin.” The Pāli is na kho ahaṁ brāhmaṇa devo bhavissāmi, and bhavissāmi is future: I will not become.

Sujato keeps the tense, and it changes the discourse completely. The common rendering — ‘I am not a god’ — makes this a text about what the Buddha mysteriously is. With the future tense it becomes a text about rebirth: he is not going to be reborn as any of these, because he is not going to be reborn.

The explanation confirms it. If I had not given up defilements I might have become a god, a centaur, a spirit, or a human. But I have given up those defilements. The four categories are four possible destinations, and the answer is that none of them applies because there is no further destination at all.

This is a case where a translation choice carries the meaning, and it is worth showing students both versions. The mystical reading is not available once the tense is restored.

The four categories

God (deva), centaur (gandhabba), spirit (yakkha), human (manussa). These are four of the possible rebirth destinations in the cosmology, running from the highest downward and ending with the ordinary.

Doṇa is asking a taxonomic question in good faith. Given the footprints, something non-ordinary is in front of him, and his framework has a slot for that. The discourse’s answer is that the framework has no slot, not because the Buddha is more exalted than the highest slot but because he has stepped out of the system the slots belong to.

The lotus

Though it sprouted and grew in the water, it would rise up above the water and stand with no water clinging to it. In the same way, though I was born and grew up in the world, I live having mastered the world, unsullied by the world.

The simile answers the question Doṇa actually asked, in a way the negations did not. It concedes the origin fully — born in the world, grew up in it, sprouted in the water — and locates the difference entirely in the present relationship. Nothing about the lotus’s substance differs from the water it grew in.

That is a deflationary image in the best sense. It rules out the reading that the Buddha is made of some other material, which is precisely the reading the footprints had invited.

“Remember me as a Buddha”

Buddhoti maṁ brāhmaṇa dhārehi — hold me in mind as a Buddha. The word is offered as the answer to ‘what are you?’, and it is a term for someone who has done something rather than for a kind of being.

That is the discourse’s resolution and it is a category shift rather than an answer within the category. Doṇa asked which of four species; he is told the relevant word names an achievement.

For teaching, this pairs naturally with AN 4.15 and AN 4.34, both of which place the Buddha at the top of a list of beings. This discourse says the list is the wrong shape. The collection contains both moves and it is more honest to show the seam than to smooth it.

Key terms

bhavissāmi — “I will be, I will become” — the future tense on which the whole discourse turns, and which most retellings lose.
gandhabba — “centaur” — a class of celestial being; one of the four rebirth destinations Doṇa proposes.
āsava — “defilement” — what has been given up, cut off at the root, made like a palm stump, so no further becoming can occur.
paṇḍarīka — “white lotus” — with the blue water lily and pink lotus, the simile that concedes the origin and locates the difference in the present relationship.
dhārehi — “hold in mind, remember” — remember me as a Buddha: a term for someone who has done something rather than for a kind of being.

The text

The discourse in full: the footprints, the four questions, the explanation, the lotus, and the verses. The gaps are the Pāli’s own abbreviation. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The footprints

§1At one time the Buddha was traveling along the road between Ukkaṭṭhā and Setavyā, as was the brahmin Doṇa. Doṇa saw that the Buddha’s footprints had thousand-spoked wheels, with rims and hubs, complete in every detail. It occurred to him, “Oh lord, how incredible, how amazing! Surely these couldn’t be the footprints of a human being?” The Buddha had left the road and sat at the root of a tree cross-legged, setting his body straight, and bringing mindfulness to the present. Then Doṇa, following the Buddha’s footprints, saw him sitting at the tree root—impressive and inspiring, with peaceful faculties and heart, attained to the highest self-control and serenity, like an elephant with tamed, guarded, and controlled faculties. He went up to the Buddha and said to him:

Four questions

§2“Sir, might you be a god?” “I will not be a god, brahmin.” “Might you be a centaur?” “I will not be a centaur.” “Might you be a spirit?” “I will not be a spirit.” “Might you be a human?” “I will not be a human.”

§3“When asked whether you might be a god, centaur, spirit, or human, you answer that you will not be any of these. So what then might you be?”

The lotus

§4“Brahmin, if I had not given up defilements I might have become a god … a centaur … a spirit … or a human. But I have given up those defilements, cut them off at the root, made them like a palm stump, obliterated them so they are unable to arise in the future. Suppose there was a blue water lily, or a pink or white lotus. Though it sprouted and grew in the water, it would rise up above the water and stand with no water clinging to it. In the same way, though I was born and grew up in the world, I live having mastered the world, unsullied by the world. Remember me, brahmin, as a Buddha.

The verses

§5I could have been reborn as a god, or as a centaur flying through the sky. I could have become a spirit, or returned as a human. But I’ve ended those defilements, they’re blown away and mown down.

§6Like a graceful lotus, to which water does not cling, the world doesn’t cling to me, and so, brahmin, I am a Buddha.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does Doṇa see, and what does he conclude?
Correct: B. He has decided the answer is not ‘human’ before he asks anything.
Question 2 of 10
How does the discourse describe what Doṇa finds?
Correct: B. The extraordinary sign leads to an ordinary posture.
Question 3 of 10
What tense is the Buddha’s refusal in?
Correct: B. Sujato keeps the tense, and it changes the discourse completely.
Question 4 of 10
What does the tense make the discourse about?
Correct: B. The mystical reading is not available once the tense is restored.
Question 5 of 10
What explanation confirms it?
Correct: B. Four categories, four possible destinations, and no further destination at all.
Question 6 of 10
What are the four categories Doṇa proposes?
Correct: B. Running from the highest downward and ending with the ordinary.
Question 7 of 10
Why does the framework have no slot?
Correct: B. A category shift rather than an answer within the category.
Question 8 of 10
What does the lotus simile concede?
Correct: B. The difference is located entirely in the present relationship.
Question 9 of 10
Why does the guide call the simile deflationary in the best sense?
Correct: B. Nothing about the lotus’s substance differs from the water it grew in.
Question 10 of 10
How does this discourse sit with AN 4.15 and AN 4.34?
Correct: B. The collection contains both moves.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0