Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.55

Equality

Samajīvinasutta

Setting
In the land of the Bhaggas, at Crocodile’s Bellow, in the home of the householder Nakula’s father
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the lay couple Nakula’s father and Nakula’s mother
Form
A brief prose exchange followed by a short set of verses restating the teaching
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Ekottarika-āgama (T125), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — plainly worded and brief, resting on a four-part framework (faith, ethics, generosity, wisdom) that recurs throughout the canon

Why this discourse

Most canonical teaching on marriage, such as it is, tends to be practical and this-worldly: how to divide labor, how to keep the peace, how to manage a household. This short discourse does something rarer. The Buddha is asked, in effect, how a couple can arrange to find each other again in a future life — and instead of offering a charm or a vow, he names a condition: the two partners must be equally developed, in the same four respects, as spiritual persons. It is one of the few places in the early texts where marriage itself is treated as a shared practice, not merely a domestic arrangement that a practice happens to occur inside of.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

If a husband and wife want to meet again in future lives, it is not enough that they love each other or stay faithful — the Buddha tells them they must be “equals in faith, ethics, generosity, and wisdom,” four qualities that, unmatched, tend to pull two lives apart even when affection holds them together.

A well-known devoted couple

The householders who host the Buddha here, Nakula’s father and Nakula’s mother, are not strangers to the tradition. They appear elsewhere in the canon as an unusually devoted pair — in one well-known episode, Nakula’s father, seriously ill, is comforted first by the Buddha directly and then by a fuller teaching from Sāriputta on how a person can be “sick in body but not sick in mind.” Here that same devotion surfaces from a different angle. The two of them tell the Buddha, independently and in nearly identical words, that neither can recall betraying the other “even in thought, still less in deed” since their youth, and that they want to see each other “in both this life and the next.” It is a plain, unadorned statement of a long marriage's quiet loyalty, offered to the Buddha almost as a question: will this be enough?

The Buddha’s answer: matched, not merely faithful

The Buddha’s reply reframes the couple’s hope. Mutual fidelity, however genuine, is not itself what determines whether two people continue to meet across lives. What matters is whether the two are samajīvino — equally developed, or “matched in life” — along four specific axes: faith (saddhā), ethical conduct (sīla), generosity (cāga), and wisdom (paññā). These four are a recognizable set: they appear again and again elsewhere in the canon as a basic description of lay spiritual maturity. What is distinctive here is the application — the claim that a couple’s continued connection depends on both partners developing along the same four dimensions, roughly together, rather than one carrying the other or the two simply coexisting under one roof.

Read carefully, this is a fairly demanding standard. It does not say that a devoted, ethical partner can simply hope to be reborn alongside a less committed one out of love or habit. It says the two need to be developing at comparable levels in the same four respects — which turns the marriage itself, by implication, into a shared practice rather than a private arrangement that one partner's practice happens to run alongside.

The verses

The Buddha closes with a short set of verses that restate the same idea in more compact form. Where both partners are faithful and generous, disciplined and living righteously, they “say nice things to each other” — the verses tie ethical harmony directly to the ordinary texture of a good marriage, not only to some future result. Their material needs are satisfied and they live at ease; even their enemies, the verses note almost wryly, are “downhearted” to see a couple so well matched in conduct. The final lines return to the couple’s original hope, but transposed: having practiced the teaching together, equally, they delight in a heavenly realm, “enjoying all the pleasures they desire” — the same hoped-for continuity the couple asked for at the start, now made conditional on the four matched qualities rather than on sentiment alone.

A rare canonical frame

Discourses addressed specifically to lay marriage, as opposed to lay ethics in general, are uncommon in the early texts. This one is worth noticing for what it does not do: it does not tell the couple to renounce attachment to each other, nor does it treat their wish to meet again as a problem to be corrected. Instead it takes the wish at face value and answers it on its own terms, converting a question about romantic continuity into a question about matched spiritual development — compatibility measured not in temperament or worldly success, but in comparable degrees of faith, ethics, generosity, and wisdom.

Key terms

samajīvino — “equally matched in life” or “living in the same way”: the discourse’s key condition for a couple who wish to continue meeting across future lives.
saddhā, sīla, cāga, paññā — faith, ethical conduct, generosity, and wisdom: a standard four-part description of lay spiritual maturity, applied here specifically to marriage.
Nakulapitā & Nakulamātā — “Nakula’s father” and “Nakula’s mother,” the householder couple who host the Buddha; remembered elsewhere in the canon as an especially devoted pair.
“in both this life and the next” — the couple’s own phrase for their hope, which the Buddha answers by redefining what continuity across lives actually depends on.

The text

The discourse in full: the couple’s declaration of mutual devotion, the Buddha’s answer, and the closing verses. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

A devoted couple

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Bhaggas at Crocodile’s Bellow, in the deer park at Bhesakaḷā’s Wood. Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, went to the home of the householder Nakula’s father, where he sat on the seat spread out. Then the householder Nakula’s father and the housewife Nakula’s mother went up to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side.

§2Nakula’s father said to the Buddha, “Sir, ever since we were both young, and Nakula’s mother was given to me in marriage, I can’t recall betraying her even in thought, still less in deed. We want to see each other in both this life and the next.” Then Nakula’s mother said to the Buddha, “Sir, ever since we were both young, and I was given in marriage to Nakula’s father, I can’t recall betraying him even in thought, still less in deed. We want to see each other in both this life and the next.”

The Buddha’s answer

§3“Householders, if wife and husband want to see each other in both this life and the next, they should be equals in faith, ethics, generosity, and wisdom.”

The verses

§4–6“When both are faithful and bountiful, disciplined, living righteously, then wife and husband say nice things to each other. Their needs are amply satisfied, so they live at ease. Their enemies are downhearted, when both are equal in ethics. Having practiced the teaching here, both equal in precepts and observances, they delight in the heavenly realm, enjoying all the pleasures they desire.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
Where does this discourse take place?
Correct: C. The Buddha visits the couple’s home directly, on his alms round.
Question 2 of 10
What do Nakula’s father and Nakula’s mother tell the Buddha, each in nearly identical words?
Correct: B. Both partners independently declare the same long-standing fidelity and the same hope.
Question 3 of 10
According to the Buddha, what actually determines whether a couple will meet again in future lives?
Correct: D. The Buddha reframes their hope around four matched qualities rather than fidelity or sentiment alone.
Question 4 of 10
What are the four qualities the Buddha names?
Correct: A. Saddhā, sīla, cāga, and paññā — a standard four-part description of lay spiritual maturity, applied here to marriage.
Question 5 of 10
What does the reading guide say elsewhere in the canon about this same couple?
Correct: C. Their devotion surfaces from a different angle in that other episode, on illness and the untroubled mind.
Question 6 of 10
According to the verses, what happens when both partners are equal in ethics?
Correct: B. The verses tie ethical harmony to the ordinary texture of a well-matched marriage, not only to a future result.
Question 7 of 10
What is the final outcome the verses describe for a couple who practice equally?
Correct: D. This answers the couple’s original hope to meet “in both this life and the next,” now made conditional on matched practice.
Question 8 of 10
What does the reading guide suggest is distinctive about this discourse’s standard for a couple’s continued connection?
Correct: A. One partner cannot simply carry the other; the standard is comparability, not just devotion or habit.
Question 9 of 10
What does the reading guide say this discourse notably does not do?
Correct: C. The Buddha takes the couple’s wish at face value and answers it on its own terms.
Question 10 of 10
Why is this discourse considered unusual within the wider canon, according to the reading guide?
Correct: B. It treats marriage itself as a shared spiritual practice rather than a domestic arrangement a practice merely occurs inside of.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0