Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.68

Devadatta

Devadattasutta — Pattakammavagga — the seventh chapter of the Fours

Setting
Rājagaha, on Vulture’s Peak Mountain, not long after Devadatta had left
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
A statement, four similes, and one verse
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
The banana-plant simile for gain and honor is widespread across the Chinese Āgamas and the Saṁyutta; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — short, dated by its setting, and built on four similes that make one point

Why this discourse

Not long after Devadatta had left. The setting line dates the discourse to the immediate aftermath of the canon’s most famous schism, and what the Buddha says about it names a cause: possessions, honor, and popularity came to Devadatta for his own ruin. Four similes follow, and all four describe the same thing — something destroyed by what it produced.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Gain, honor, and popularity destroyed Devadatta, the way fruit destroys the plant that bore it.

The setting and what it dates

Devadatta was the Buddha’s cousin, a senior monk of real attainment, who eventually attempted to take over the Saṅgha, made three attempts on the Buddha’s life, and left with a body of followers. The canon treats the episode at length in the Vinaya.

Acirapakkante devadatte — not long after Devadatta had left. This discourse is placed immediately after the schism and is spoken on Vulture’s Peak, the mountain from which, in the Vinaya account, Devadatta rolled a stone at him.

That placement matters for how the discourse reads. It is not a general warning illustrated by an example. It is what was said about a specific person, recently, by someone who had known him for a long time.

The named cause

Lābhasakkārasiloka — possessions, honor, and popularity. The compound recurs throughout the canon as the standing danger to a religious life, and AN 4.25 named it among the things the spiritual life is not lived for.

What is claimed here is not that Devadatta wanted these things and therefore fell. It is that they came to him — udapādi, arose — for his ruin. The grammar makes the gain the agent.

That is worth pressing on, because it is a genuinely uncomfortable claim. Devadatta was successful. He had a royal patron in Ajātasattu, a following, and a reputation. The discourse says that receiving these was what destroyed him, and it does not add a condition about how he received them.

AN 4.43 and 4.44, in the previous chapter, gave the mechanism: someone who values possessions and honor above the teaching does not grow in it. This discourse is that diagnosis applied to a named case.

The four similes

A banana plant, a bamboo, a reed — all of which bear fruit to their own ruin — and a mule, which becomes pregnant to its own ruin.

The three plants share a real botanical fact: bamboos and many reeds are monocarpic, flowering once and then dying, and a banana stem dies after fruiting. The simile is not poetic invention; it names something the audience could see in a field.

The mule is different and harsher. A mule is sterile, and a pregnancy in one was understood to be fatal to the animal. Where the plants die from doing what they are for, the mule dies from doing something it should not be able to do at all.

That escalation across the four is the point of having four. Success can kill you because it is the natural end of your growth, or because it is something you were never built to carry. The verse keeps both: honor destroys a reprobate, as pregnancy destroys a mule.

‘A reprobate’

The verse’s word for the person destroyed is kāpurisa — a bad or contemptible man, the opposite of the sappurisa, the true person, who runs through this collection.

That qualification is doing work and it should not be skipped. The verse does not say honor destroys everyone. It says honor destroys a kāpurisa, which leaves open the case of someone who receives it and is not destroyed.

So the discourse is not a blanket claim that success is fatal to a religious life. It is a claim that success is fatal to a certain kind of person, and that the kind is not always visible until the success arrives. That is the more useful reading and it is the one the verse supports.

Teaching it

The obvious difficulty is that the discourse is about a person the tradition treats as its great villain, and villain narratives are not usually good material for self-examination. The useful move is to hold on to what the discourse does not say.

It does not say Devadatta was always going to do this. It does not say he lacked attainment — the canon credits him with psychic powers. It does not say his followers were fools. It names one thing that came to him and destroyed him, and that thing is available to anyone who is any good at what they do.

Read that way the discourse is not about a villain. It is about what happens to a capable person who succeeds, and it is placed in a chapter otherwise concerned with lay prosperity, immediately after a discourse on the four kinds of person one might be.

Key terms

lābhasakkārasiloka — “possessions, honor, and popularity” — a standing compound for what corrupts a religious life from outside.
Devadatta — the Buddha’s cousin and a senior monk who attempted to take over the Saṅgha and left with a following; the Vinaya treats the episode at length.
kadalī — “banana plant” — the stem dies after fruiting; the first of three plants destroyed by what they bear.
assatarī — “mule” — sterile, and understood to die of pregnancy; the fourth simile, and the harshest.
kāpurisa — “reprobate” — a contemptible man, the opposite of sappurisa. The verse says honor destroys him, not everyone.

The text

The discourse in full: the statement, the four similes, and the verse. The ellipses are the Pāli’s own abbreviation. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Not long after Devadatta had left

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, on the Vulture’s Peak Mountain, not long after Devadatta had left. There the Buddha spoke to the mendicants about Devadatta: “Possessions, honor, and popularity came to Devadatta for his own ruin and downfall.

The similes

§2It’s like a banana plant, or a bamboo, or a reed, all of which bear fruit to their own ruin and downfall … It’s like a mule, which becomes pregnant to its own ruin and downfall. In the same way, possessions, honor, and popularity came to Devadatta for his own ruin and downfall.

The verse

§3The banana plant is destroyed by its own fruit, as are the bamboo and the reed. Honor destroys a reprobate, as pregnancy destroys a mule.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
When is the discourse set?
Correct: B. Spoken on Vulture’s Peak, the mountain of the Vinaya account.
Question 2 of 10
Why does that placement matter?
Correct: B. Devadatta was the Buddha’s cousin and a senior monk of real attainment.
Question 3 of 10
What is named as the cause?
Correct: B. The grammar makes the gain the agent.
Question 4 of 10
Why does the guide call the claim uncomfortable?
Correct: B. AN 4.43 and 4.44 supplied the mechanism; this applies it to a named case.
Question 5 of 10
What do the three plant similes share?
Correct: B. Not poetic invention; something the audience could see in a field.
Question 6 of 10
How is the mule simile different?
Correct: B. A mule is sterile, and pregnancy in one was understood to be fatal.
Question 7 of 10
What does the escalation across the four accomplish?
Correct: B. The verse keeps both.
Question 8 of 10
What is a kāpurisa?
Correct: B. The verse says honor destroys him, not everyone.
Question 9 of 10
What does that qualification leave open?
Correct: B. Success is fatal to a certain kind of person, and the kind is not always visible until it arrives.
Question 10 of 10
What does the guide say the discourse does not claim?
Correct: B. It names one thing that came to him, and that thing is available to anyone who is any good at what they do.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0