Reading guide
A five-fold Socratic drumbeat
For each of the five precepts in turn, the Buddha asks the mendicants: have you ever seen or heard of someone arrested and punished by kings specifically for having given up killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, or intoxicants? Each time, the answer is a flat no.
What actually draws punishment
The Buddha then draws the real contrast: kings do arrest and punish people — but for the actual bad deed itself (murder, theft, adultery, fraud, drunk-and-disorderly crime), never for the corresponding restraint. The mendicants confirm they've seen exactly this.
Precepts and secular law, aligned rather than opposed
The argument's real force is structural: ordinary legal and social consequence never falls on someone for keeping a precept, only for breaking the underlying norm the precept protects — suggesting the five precepts track, rather than conflict with, everyday social expectations most people already hold.
The intoxicants case, elaborated further
The fifth iteration, on intoxicants, adds a further layer: someone punished for drunkenness is typically punished because, while under the influence, they committed one of the other four offenses — murder, theft, adultery, or fraud — making explicit how the fifth precept's violation compounds the risk of violating the other four.
A companion to AN 5.174's inner argument
Where AN 5.174 argued that breaking the precepts generates fear and enmity from within, this discourse argues the same point from outside: the precepts align with what secular authority itself already punishes and protects, giving the same conclusion two independent kinds of support.
Key terms
The text
Killing
§1“What do you think, mendicants? Have you ever seen or heard of a person who has given up killing living creatures, and the kings have them arrested for that, and execute, imprison, or banish them, or do what the case requires?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I too have never seen or heard of such a thing. Rather, the kings are informed of someone’s bad deed: ‘This person has murdered a man or a woman.’ The kings have them arrested for killing, and execute, imprison, or banish them, or do what the case requires. Have you ever seen or heard of such a case?” “Sir, we have seen it and heard of it, and we will hear of it again.”
Stealing
§2“What do you think, mendicants? Have you ever seen or heard of a person who has given up stealing, and the kings have them arrested for that …?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I too have never seen or heard of such a thing. Rather, the kings are informed of someone’s bad deed: ‘This person took something from a village or wilderness, with the intention to commit theft.’ The kings have them arrested for stealing … Have you ever seen or heard of such a case?” “Sir, we have seen it and heard of it, and we will hear of it again.”
Sexual misconduct
§3“What do you think, mendicants? Have you ever seen or heard of a person who has given up sexual misconduct, and the kings have them arrested for that …?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I too have never seen or heard of such a thing. Rather, the kings are informed of someone’s bad deed: ‘This person had sexual relations with women or maidens under someone else’s protection.’ The kings have them arrested for that … Have you ever seen or heard of such a case?” “Sir, we have seen it and heard of it, and we will hear of it again.”
Lying
§4“What do you think, mendicants? Have you ever seen or heard of a person who has given up lying, and the kings have them arrested for that …?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I too have never seen or heard of such a thing. Rather, the kings are informed of someone’s bad deed: ‘This person has ruined a householder or householder’s child by lying.’ The kings have them arrested for that … Have you ever seen or heard of such a case?” “Sir, we have seen it and heard of it, and we will hear of it again.”
Intoxicants
§5“What do you think, mendicants? Have you ever seen or heard of a person who has given up beer, wine, and liquor intoxicants, and the kings have them arrested for that, and execute, imprison, or banish them, or do what the case requires?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I too have never seen or heard of such a thing. Rather, the kings are informed of someone’s bad deed: ‘While under the influence of beer, wine, and liquor intoxicants, this person murdered a woman or a man. Or they stole something from a village or wilderness. Or they had sexual relations with women or maidens under someone else’s protection. Or they ruined a householder or householder’s child by lying.’ The kings have them arrested for being under the influence of beer, wine, and liquor intoxicants, and execute, imprison, or banish them, or do what the case requires. Have you ever seen or heard of such a case?” “Sir, we have seen it and heard of it, and we will hear of it again.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.