Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.238

Deserving Criticism (3rd)

Tatiyaavaṇṇārahasutta — Āvāsikavagga — the twenty-fourth chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
two paired five-item lists, hell then heaven
Length
~1.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — the third and final discourse in a three-part trio

Why this discourse

The third and final discourse in this chapter's trio, keeping the same careless-judgment opening but now naming three full items of stinginess — monasteries, patronage families, and material things — the fullest stinginess list this trio reaches before the gift-wasting item drops away entirely.

Reading guide

The same opening, one final time

As in AN 5.236–237, this discourse begins with careless, unexamined praise of those deserving criticism, and careless criticism of those deserving praise — the shared foundation of this entire trio.

Three stinginess items, not two

Where AN 5.237 named stinginess over monasteries and families, this discourse adds a third: stinginess over material things (lābhamacchariya) — continuing this trio's progressive build toward the full classical five-item list.

A quieter closing item than 5.236-237

Unlike its two companions, this discourse's list has five items without needing the separate ‘wasting a gift given in faith’ clause — the two judgment items plus three stinginess items already total five on their own.

A trio's internal logic, now visible in full

Read across all three discourses: AN 5.236 pairs careless judgment with faith-related failures alone; AN 5.237 adds two stinginess items; AN 5.238 adds a third — a genuine progression, not simple repetition, building steadily toward something larger.

What comes next

AN 5.239 and AN 5.240 complete this build-up decisively, dropping the careless-judgment items entirely and presenting the classical five-part stinginess formula on its own terms — the destination this trio has been building toward.

Key terms

ananuvicca apariyogāhetvā — “without examining or scrutinizing” — the shared opening diagnosis across all three discourses in this trio.
āvāsamacchariya, kulamacchariya — “stinginess over monasteries, stinginess over families” — the two stinginess items carried over from AN 5.237.
lābhamacchariya — “stinginess over material things” — the third stinginess item, newly added in this discourse.
vaṇṇārahassa vaṇṇaṁ, avaṇṇārahassa avaṇṇaṁ — “praise for those deserving praise, criticism for those deserving criticism” — the positive counterpart's correctly matched judgments.
macchariya — “stinginess” — the theme this trio progressively builds toward its full classical treatment.

The text

The discourse in full: careless judgment paired with three stinginess items. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Five qualities placed in hell

§1“Mendicants, a resident mendicant with five qualities is placed in hell as if delivered there. What five? Without examining or scrutinizing, they praise those deserving of criticism, and they criticize those deserving of praise. They’re stingy regarding monasteries, families, and material things. A resident mendicant with these five qualities is placed in hell as if delivered there.

Five qualities placed in heaven

§2A resident mendicant with five qualities is placed in heaven as if delivered there. What five? After examining and scrutinizing, they criticize those deserving of criticism, and they praise those deserving of praise. They’re not stingy regarding monasteries, families, and material things. A resident mendicant with these five qualities is placed in heaven as if delivered there.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What opening does this discourse share with AN 5.236-237?
Correct: A. The shared foundation of this entire trio.
Question 2 of 10
What third stinginess item does this discourse add, beyond AN 5.237's two?
Correct: A. Continuing this trio's progressive build toward the full classical list.
Question 3 of 10
How does this discourse's list reach five items, differently from AN 5.236-237?
Correct: A. The math works out differently than its two companion discourses.
Question 4 of 10
What progression does this guide identify across AN 5.236-238?
Correct: A. Building steadily toward something larger.
Question 5 of 10
What do AN 5.239-240 do, completing this trio's build-up?
Correct: A. The destination this trio has been building toward.
Question 6 of 10
What does 'lābhamacchariya' mean?
Correct: A. The newly added third stinginess item.
Question 7 of 10
What does 'ananuvicca apariyogāhetvā' mean?
Correct: A. The shared diagnostic phrase across this whole trio.
Question 8 of 10
What stinginess items were already present in AN 5.237, before this discourse's addition?
Correct: A. This discourse adds material things as a third.
Question 9 of 10
What consequence does this discourse's negative list lead to?
Correct: A. Matching the pattern of AN 5.236-237.
Question 10 of 10
What chapter does this discourse belong to?
Correct: A. 'A Resident Mendicant', this session's twenty-fourth chapter.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0