Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.20

Mindfulness of Death (2nd)

Dutiyamaraṇassatisutta — Sāraṇīyavagga — the second chapter of the Sixes

Setting
Ñātika, in the brick house — restated fresh, matching AN 6.19
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
A named method, given twice — once for evening, once for morning — each with an identical simile of urgency
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
As with AN 6.19, mindfulness of death recurs widely across the Chinese Āgamas and later literature; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a fuller, more procedural teaching than AN 6.19, worth reading slowly for its structure

Why this discourse

AN 6.19 named a criterion — how frequently the reflection on death is renewed — without saying what, specifically, a mendicant should reflect on. AN 6.20, closing the chapter, supplies that content in full: as day turns to night, and again as night turns to day, a mendicant runs through the many ordinary ways death could arrive — snakebite, a fall, food poisoning, illness — and asks whether any unabandoned unskillful quality would obstruct their progress if death came before the next check. What follows from that question, in either direction, is stated with the same urgency twice: extraordinary effort if the answer is yes, sustained joyful practice if the answer is no.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Twice daily — as day passes into night, and as night passes into day — a mendicant should reflect on the many ordinary causes of death, check whether any unabandoned unskillful quality would be an obstacle if death came before the next check, and respond either with extraordinary urgency to give up such qualities or with rapture and joy in continued skillful training.

A concrete, unglamorous list of causes

The discourse does not speak abstractly of mortality; it names specific, mundane hazards — snakebite, scorpion or centipede sting, stumbling off a cliff, food poisoning, disturbance of bile, phlegm, or the bodily “winds” — the kind of dangers any person, not only a mendicant, might reasonably imagine facing on an ordinary night or day. Death here is not a distant abstraction to be philosophized about but a near, mundane possibility to be checked against, twice within one day.

The question that follows the reflection

Naming causes of death is only the first step; the discourse's actual instruction is the question that follows: “Are there any bad, unskillful qualities that I haven't given up, which might be an obstacle to my progress if I die tonight?” — or, in the morning version, “today.” Mindfulness of death, on this discourse's terms, is not primarily about dwelling on death itself; it is a device for surfacing exactly what remains unfinished in one's own practice, on a fixed and frequent schedule.

The simile: clothes or head on fire

For a mendicant who finds unabandoned unskillful qualities upon checking, the discourse prescribes a response measured against a stock canonical image of maximum urgency: someone whose clothes or head have caught fire would apply “extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness” to extinguish it, and giving up unskillful qualities should be met with the identical seven-part urgency.

Closing the chapter on a doubled structure

AN 6.20 states its method twice — evening and morning — in nearly identical wording, closing the Sāraṇīyavagga on a note of sustained, twice-daily practice rather than a single teaching given once. The chapter that opened on warmth between spiritual companions closes, ten discourses later, on what a mendicant owes to their own unfinished practice, checked against the plain fact that today or tonight might be the last chance to address it.

Key terms

maraṇassati — “mindfulness of death” — unchanged in name from AN 6.19, now given its full method.
antarāyika — “an obstacle,” “obstructive” — what an unabandoned unskillful quality is said to be, to a mendicant's progress, if death arrived before it were given up.
ussukkaṁ āpajjeyya — “should apply extraordinary effort” — the instruction following a positive check, paired with the fire simile.
pāmojja — “rapture and joy” — what a mendicant who finds no unabandoned unskillful qualities is instructed to meditate with instead, training day and night in skillful qualities.
amatogadha — “freedom from death as its objective and culmination” — the closing restatement, shared with AN 6.19, of what mindfulness of death is ultimately for.

The text

The discourse in full: the evening reflection and the morning reflection, each closing with the fire simile. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

At Ñātika: the question restated

§1At one time the Buddha was staying at Ñātika in the brick house. There the Buddha addressed the mendicants: “Mendicants, when mindfulness of death is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination. And how is mindfulness of death developed and cultivated to be very fruitful and beneficial, with freedom from death as its objective and culmination?

The evening reflection

§2As day passes by and night draws close, a mendicant reflects: ‘I might die of many causes. A snake might bite me, or a scorpion or centipede might sting me. And if I died from that it would be an obstacle to me. Or I might stumble off a cliff, or get food poisoning, or suffer a disturbance of bile, phlegm, or piercing winds. And if I died from that it would be an obstacle to my progress. ’ That mendicant should reflect: ‘Are there any bad, unskillful qualities that I haven’t given up, which might be an obstacle to my progress if I die tonight?’ Suppose that, upon checking, a mendicant knows that there are such bad, unskillful qualities. Then in order to give them up they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. Suppose your clothes or head were on fire. In order to extinguish it, you’d apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. In the same way, in order to give up those bad, unskillful qualities, that mendicant should apply extraordinary enthusiasm … But suppose that, upon checking, a mendicant knows that there are no such bad, unskillful qualities. Then that mendicant should meditate with rapture and joy, training day and night in skillful qualities.

The morning reflection

§3Or else, as night passes by and day draws close, a mendicant reflects: ‘I might die of many causes. A snake might bite me, or a scorpion or centipede might sting me. And if I died from that it would be an obstacle to my progress. Or I might stumble off a cliff, or get food poisoning, or suffer a disturbance of bile, phlegm, or piercing winds. And if I died from that it would be an obstacle to my progress. ’ That mendicant should reflect: ‘Are there any bad, unskillful qualities that I haven’t given up, which might be an obstacle to my progress if I die today?’ Suppose that, upon checking, a mendicant knows that there are such bad, unskillful qualities. Then in order to give them up they should apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. Suppose your clothes or head were on fire. In order to extinguish it, you’d apply extraordinary enthusiasm, effort, zeal, vigor, perseverance, mindfulness, and situational awareness. In the same way, in order to give up those bad, unskillful qualities, that mendicant should apply extraordinary enthusiasm … But suppose that, upon checking, a mendicant knows that there are no such bad, unskillful qualities. Then that mendicant should meditate with rapture and joy, training day and night in skillful qualities.

The conclusion

§4Mindfulness of death, when developed and cultivated in this way, is very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How often does AN 6.20 instruct a mendicant to run through its reflection?
Correct: B. A doubled structure, evening and morning, in nearly identical wording.
Question 2 of 10
What kind of causes of death does the discourse name?
Correct: B. Ordinary dangers anyone might imagine facing on a given night or day.
Question 3 of 10
What is the actual question a mendicant is instructed to ask after naming these causes?
Correct: B. A device for surfacing what remains unfinished in one's own practice, checked on a fixed schedule.
Question 4 of 10
What simile does the discourse use for the urgency required if unskillful qualities are found?
Correct: B. A stock canonical image of maximum urgency, applied here to giving up unskillful qualities.
Question 5 of 10
What should a mendicant do if the check finds no unabandoned unskillful qualities?
Correct: B. A positive outcome met with sustained joyful practice, not complacency.
Question 6 of 10
According to the guide, what is mindfulness of death primarily about, on this discourse's terms?
Correct: B. Not morbid dwelling, but a practical checking device.
Question 7 of 10
Where is AN 6.20 set?
Correct: B. A fresh restatement of the same setting shared with AN 6.19.
Question 8 of 10
What relationship does the guide draw between AN 6.19 and AN 6.20?
Correct: B. A companion pair completing one teaching across two discourses.
Question 9 of 10
What does the guide say about how the chapter closes?
Correct: B. A shift in register across the chapter's ten discourses, from communal warmth to individual urgency.
Question 10 of 10
What does antarāyika mean?
Correct: B. What an unabandoned unskillful quality is said to be to a mendicant's progress.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0