Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 7.12

Underlying Tendencies (2nd)

Dutiyaanusayasutta — Anusayavagga — the second chapter of the Sevens

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
The identical seven-item list as AN 7.11, elaborated with a statement of purpose and the same closing formula already met twice in this series
Length
under 1 minute to read
Northern parallel
The image of an underlying tendency cut off 'at the root, like a palm stump' recurs widely across the Chinese Āgamas' descriptions of complete abandonment; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — restates AN 7.11's bare list with the fullest statement of purpose in this chapter so far

Why this discourse

AN 7.12 does for AN 7.11's seven underlying tendencies exactly what AN 7.9 already did for AN 7.8's seven fetters: states their removal as the entire purpose of the spiritual life, uses the identical “cut off at the root, like a palm stump” image for complete elimination, and closes on the same formula — now met a third time in this series.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

The entire spiritual life is lived to give up and cut out the seven underlying tendencies — sensual desire, aversion, views, doubt, conceit, desire to be reborn, and ignorance — cutting them off at the root so they can never arise again.

A structural twin of AN 7.9, applied to a different category

Checked side by side, this discourse and AN 7.9 share their entire structure — the statement of purpose, the palm-stump image, the closing formula — differing only in whether the seven items being removed are named as fetters or as underlying tendencies.

A third appearance of this closing formula

“Cut off craving, cast off the fetters, and by rightly comprehending conceit has made an end of suffering” now closes AN 6.105, AN 6.106, and AN 7.9 in the previous nipāta and chapter, and this discourse makes a fourth appearance — the same formula applied across four discourses with different specific content in every case, spanning two nipātas.

Why fetters and tendencies each get their own pair

That this chapter gives underlying tendencies the identical bare-list-plus-elaboration treatment the previous chapter already gave fetters, rather than simply noting the overlap and moving on, suggests the tradition considered each technical category worth stating fully in its own right, even where the specific content named is identical.

Key terms

brahmacariya — “the spiritual life” — this discourse's framing for the entire purpose the seven underlying tendencies' removal serves, identical to AN 7.9's framing.
mūlaghacca, tālāvatthukata — “cut off at the root, made like a palm stump” — the same image for complete, irreversible removal already met at AN 7.9.
kāmarāga, paṭigha, diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, māna, bhavarāga, avijjā — identical to AN 7.11's seven underlying tendencies: sensual desire, aversion, views, doubt, conceit, desire to be reborn, and ignorance.
taṇhacchida, mānābhisamayā antamakāsi dukkhassa — “one who has cut off craving... by rightly comprehending conceit, made an end of suffering” — the closing formula's fourth appearance in this series, after AN 6.105, AN 6.106, and AN 7.9.
anusaya — “underlying tendency” — the technical category this discourse addresses, structurally paired with AN 7.9's treatment of fetters.

The text

The discourse in full: the purpose and complete removal of the seven underlying tendencies. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The purpose of the spiritual life

§1“Mendicants, the spiritual life is lived to give up and cut out these seven underlying tendencies. What seven? The underlying tendencies of sensual desire, aversion, views, doubt, conceit, desire to be reborn, and ignorance. The spiritual life is lived to give up and cut out these seven underlying tendencies.

Complete removal, and the closing formula

§2When a mendicant has given up the underlying tendencies of sensual desire, repulsion, views, doubt, conceit, desire to be reborn, and ignorance—cut them off at the root, made them like a palm stump, obliterated them, so they are unable to arise in the future—they’re called a mendicant who has cut off craving, cast off the fetters, and by rightly comprehending conceit has made an end of suffering.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
How does this discourse's structure compare to AN 7.9's, checked side by side?
Correct: B. A structural twin of AN 7.9, applied to a different technical category.
Question 2 of 6
How many times has this discourse's closing formula now appeared in this series, counting this discourse?
Correct: C. The same formula spanning two nipātas and four discourses with different specific content each time.
Question 3 of 6
According to the guide, why might fetters and underlying tendencies each get their own bare-list-plus-elaboration pair, despite identical content?
Correct: B. A deliberate choice to treat each category on its own terms.
Question 4 of 6
What image describes complete removal in this discourse?
Correct: B. The same image already met at AN 7.9, describing total, irreversible elimination.
Question 5 of 6
Is a setting stated for AN 7.12?
Correct: B. A bare formula, matching AN 7.11 immediately before it.
Question 6 of 6
What is the entire purpose the spiritual life is said to serve, according to this discourse?
Correct: B. The highest possible framing this literature gives to a single teaching.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0