Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 7.49

Perceptions in Detail

Dutiyasaññāsutta — Mahāyaññavagga — the fifth chapter of the Sevens, closing its First Fifty

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
The same seven perceptions as AN 7.48, each introduced with “that's what I said, but why did I say it?” and answered in turn; the source text itself abbreviates five of the seven answers with its own internal ellipsis
Length
~4 minutes to read
Companion discourse
AN 7.48 immediately before gives the same seven perceptions as a bare list
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — only two of the seven answers are given in full; the other five are genuinely abbreviated in the source, not omitted by this reading guide

Why this discourse

AN 7.49 takes AN 7.48's seven perceptions and asks, for each one in turn, why the Buddha said developing it is so fruitful — but the source text itself only answers the question in full for the first (ugliness) and the seventh (not-self in suffering), abbreviating the middle five with its own peyyāla ellipsis rather than repeating the same simile five more times.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Each of AN 7.48's seven perceptions is introduced with the same question — “that's what I said, but why did I say it?” — and answered by naming what craving or discomfort the mind draws back from once that perception is well developed, with a self-check for telling a genuinely developed perception from an undeveloped one.

The perception of ugliness, given in full

The first perception gets the discourse's complete treatment: a mendicant who often meditates on ugliness finds their mind drawing back from sexual intercourse, compared to a chicken's feather or a scrap of sinew thrown into a fire, which shrivels and rolls up rather than stretching out. A two-sided self-check follows — if the mind is still drawn to intercourse rather than repulsed, the perception is undeveloped; if it draws back, development has been achieved.

Five perceptions, genuinely abbreviated in the source itself

The next five — death, the repulsiveness of food, dissatisfaction with the whole world, impermanence, and suffering rooted in impermanence — each name what the mind draws back from (the desire to be reborn, craving for tastes, the world's shiny things, material things and honors and fame) but then abbreviate the chicken-feather simile and the two-sided self-check with an ellipsis, trusting the reader to supply what perception 1 already spelled out in full. This is the source text's own shorthand, not a gap in this reading guide.

The perception of not-self in suffering, given in full again

The seventh and final perception breaks from the abbreviated middle five to receive its own complete description, and a different one: not a chicken-feather simile but a direct account of a heart rid of I-making, mine-making, and conceit, gone beyond discrimination, peaceful and well freed — the discourse's fullest statement of what full liberation from these seven perceptions actually looks like.

Key terms

kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ — “why did I say it?” — the question repeated before each of the seven perceptions is explained in turn.
kukkuṭapattaṁ vā nhārudaddulaṁ vā aggimhi pakkhittaṁ — “a chicken's feather or a scrap of sinew thrown in a fire” — the simile given in full for the perception of ugliness, and abbreviated by ellipsis for the five perceptions that follow it.
methunadhammasamāpatti — “sexual intercourse” — what the mind reinforced with the perception of ugliness draws back from, this discourse's first and fullest example.
abhāvitā, subhāvitā — “undeveloped”, “well developed” — the two-sided self-check's own verdict, repeated for the perception of ugliness and left to be supplied by the reader for the abbreviated five.
ahaṅkāramamaṅkāramānāpagataṁ — “rid of I-making, mine-making, and conceit” — the distinct, non-abbreviated description given for the seventh perception, not-self in suffering.

The text

The discourse in full, including the source text's own abbreviation of five of the seven answers. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The seven perceptions, and their shared goal, restated

§1“Mendicants, these seven perceptions, when developed and cultivated, are very fruitful and beneficial. They have freedom from death as their objective and culmination. What seven? The perceptions of ugliness, death, repulsiveness of food, dissatisfaction with the whole world, impermanence, suffering in impermanence, and not-self in suffering. These seven perceptions, when developed and cultivated, are very fruitful and beneficial. They have freedom from death as their objective and culmination.

The perception of ugliness, why it was said, in full

§2‘When the perception of ugliness is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of ugliness, their mind draws back from sexual intercourse. They shrink away, turn aside, and don’t get drawn into it. And either equanimity or revulsion become stabilized. It’s like a chicken’s feather or a scrap of sinew thrown in a fire. It shrivels up, shrinks, rolls up, and doesn’t stretch out. In the same way, when a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of ugliness, their mind draws back from sexual intercourse. … If a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of ugliness, but their mind is drawn to sexual intercourse, and not repulsed, they should know: ‘My perception of ugliness is undeveloped. I don’t have any distinction higher than before. I haven’t attained a fruit of development.’ In this way they are aware of the situation. But if a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of ugliness, their mind draws back from sexual intercourse … they should know: ‘My perception of ugliness is well developed. I have realized a distinction higher than before. I have attained a fruit of development.’ In this way they are aware of the situation. ‘When the perception of ugliness is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

The perception of death, in brief

§3‘When the perception of death is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of death, their mind draws back from desire to be reborn. … That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

The perception of the repulsiveness of food, in brief

§4‘When the perception of the repulsiveness of food is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of the repulsiveness of food, their mind draws back from craving for tastes. … That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

The perception of dissatisfaction with the whole world, in brief

§5‘When the perception of dissatisfaction with the whole world is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of dissatisfaction with the whole world, their mind draws back from the world’s shiny things. … That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

The perception of impermanence, in brief

§6‘When the perception of impermanence is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of impermanence, their mind draws back from material things, honors, and fame. … That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

The perception of suffering in impermanence, in brief

§7‘When the perception of suffering in impermanence is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of suffering in impermanence, they establish a keen perception of the danger of sloth, laziness, slackness, negligence, lack of commitment, and failure to review, like a killer with a drawn sword. … That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

The perception of not-self in suffering, why it was said, in full

§8‘When the perception of not-self in suffering is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of not-self in suffering, their heart is rid of I-making, mine-making, and conceit for this conscious body and externally for all signs. It has gone beyond discrimination, and is peaceful and well freed. If a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of not-self in suffering, but their heart is not rid of I-making, mine-making, and conceit for this conscious body and externally for all signs; nor has it gone beyond discrimination, and is not peaceful or well freed, they should know: ‘My perception of not-self in suffering is undeveloped. I don’t have any distinction higher than before. I haven’t attained a fruit of development.’ In this way they are aware of the situation. But if a mendicant often meditates with a mind reinforced with the perception of not-self in suffering, and their heart is rid of I-making, mine-making, and conceit for this conscious body and externally for all signs; and it has gone beyond discrimination, and is peaceful and well freed, they should know: ‘My perception of not-self in suffering is well developed. I have realized a distinction higher than before. I have attained a fruit of development.’ In this way they are aware of the situation. ‘When the perception of not-self in suffering is developed and cultivated it’s very fruitful and beneficial. It has freedom from death as its objective and culmination.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

Closing

§9These seven perceptions, when developed and cultivated, are very fruitful and beneficial. Their objective and culmination is freedom from death.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What question does this discourse ask about each of AN 7.48's seven perceptions in turn?
Correct: B. A recurring formula, repeated before each perception's answer.
Question 2 of 6
According to the guide, how many of the seven perceptions receive the discourse's complete, non-abbreviated treatment?
Correct: B. The source text itself elides the middle five, not this reading guide.
Question 3 of 6
What simile does this discourse give for the perception of ugliness?
Correct: B. The discourse's one fully spelled-out simile, referenced by ellipsis for the five perceptions that follow it.
Question 4 of 6
What two-sided self-check does the discourse offer for the perception of ugliness?
Correct: B. A first-person diagnostic, left implicit for the abbreviated five that follow.
Question 5 of 6
How does the seventh perception, not-self in suffering, differ from the perception of ugliness in how it is described?
Correct: B. A distinct full treatment, not a repetition of perception 1's simile.
Question 6 of 6
What earlier discourse in this chapter gives these same seven perceptions as a bare list?
Correct: C. AN 7.48, the short half of this pairing.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0