Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 9.36

Depending on Absorption

Jhānasutta — Mahāvagga — the fourth chapter of the Nines

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
Seven attainments each declared a basis for insight, with a shared formula and an archer simile, closing on an explicit limit
Length
~4 minutes to read
Jhāna as insight-basis, not just calm
This discourse's real claim is that absorption itself, contemplated rightly, can directly end the defilements — not merely prepare the mind for insight practiced elsewhere
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — a doctrinally dense discourse, among the most significant in this chapter

Why this discourse

Each of the four absorptions and the first three formless dimensions is declared a basis for ending the defilements: a mendicant contemplates the phenomena present in that very attainment as impermanent, suffering, and not-self, turns the mind from them toward the peace of freedom from death, and either ends the defilements directly or is reborn spontaneously — while the top two attainments, the discourse says, can only be properly explained by meditators already skilled in them.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Each of the first seven progressive attainments — the four absorptions and the dimensions of infinite space, infinite consciousness, and nothingness — is itself a basis for ending the defilements, when a mendicant contemplates whatever occurs there as impermanent, suffering, and not-self, then turns the mind toward the peace of freedom from death.

Absorption as insight-basis, not only calm

This is a doctrinally significant claim: rather than treating jhāna purely as a calming preliminary to insight practiced afterward, this discourse says the very phenomena constituting an absorption — its form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness — can themselves become insight's own object, ended right there within the attainment.

An archer's practice, and a shared refrain

For each attainment declared a basis, the discourse supplies the identical explanation: like an archer who first trains on a straw man before becoming a marksman who shatters large objects, a mendicant contemplates the attainment's own constituents, turns away from them toward freedom from death, and either ends the defilements outright or, short of that, is reborn spontaneously through the ending of the five lower fetters.

An explicit limit on the top two stages

The discourse closes with an unusual admission of its own boundary: penetration to enlightenment through this method extends only as far as attainments that still involve perception. The dimension of neither perception nor non-perception and the cessation of perception and feeling — the two most subtle stages — are, by the discourse's own account, properly explained only by meditators already skilled in entering and emerging from them, rather than through the insight-method this discourse has just given for the first seven.

Key terms

āsavānaṁ khayāya paccayo — “a basis for ending the defilements” — the discourse's own claim for each of the first seven attainments.
aniccato dukkhato rogato gaṇḍato sallato aghato ābādhato parato palokato suññato anattato samanupassati — “impermanent, suffering, diseased, a boil, a dart, gloom, an affliction, alien, breaking apart, empty, not-self” — the eleven-fold contemplation applied to each attainment's own constituents.
etaṁ santaṁ etaṁ paṇītaṁ — “this is peaceful; this is sublime” — the turn from contemplating the attainment's constituents toward freedom from death itself.
dīghadassī vā gaṇṭhikkhepī — “a marksman... who shatters large objects” — the archer simile's own culmination, matching an insight practiced within absorption to trained skill.
saññāgatāva tattha paññāpanāya — “properly explained by meditators... skilled in these attainments” — the discourse's own explicit boundary for the top two, subtlest stages.

The text

The discourse in full: seven attainments declared bases for insight, an archer simile, and an explicit limit on the final two stages. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Seven attainments, each a basis for insight

§1“Mendicants, I say that the first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements. The second absorption is also a basis for ending the defilements. The third absorption is also a basis for ending the defilements. The fourth absorption is also a basis for ending the defilements. The dimension of infinite space is also a basis for ending the defilements. The dimension of infinite consciousness is also a basis for ending the defilements. The dimension of nothingness is also a basis for ending the defilements. The dimension of neither perception nor non-perception is also a basis for ending the defilements. The cessation of perception and feeling is also a basis for ending the defilements. ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Take a mendicant who, quite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskillful qualities, enters and remains in the first absorption. They contemplate the phenomena there—included in form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness—as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. They turn their mind away from those things, and apply it to freedom from death: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ Abiding in that they attain the ending of defilements. If they don’t attain the ending of defilements, with the ending of the five lower fetters they’re reborn spontaneously, because of their passion and love for that meditation. They are extinguished there, and are not liable to return from that world. It’s like an archer or their apprentice who first practices on a straw man or a clay model. At a later time they become a long-distance shooter, a marksman, who shatters large objects. In the same way a noble disciple, quite secluded from sensual pleasures, enters and remains in the first absorption. They contemplate the phenomena there—included in form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness—as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. They turn their mind away from those things, and apply it to freedom from death: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ Abiding in that they attain the ending of defilements. If they don’t attain the ending of defilements, with the ending of the five lower fetters they’re reborn spontaneously, because of their passion and love for that meditation. They are extinguished there, and are not liable to return from that world. ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it. ‘The second absorption is also a basis for ending the defilements.’ … ‘The third absorption is also a basis for ending the defilements.’ … ‘The fourth absorption is also a basis for ending the defilements.’ …

§2‘The dimension of infinite space is also a basis for ending the defilements.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Take a mendicant who, going totally beyond perceptions of form, with the disappearance of perceptions of impingement, not focusing on perceptions of diversity, aware that ‘space is infinite’, enters and remains in the dimension of infinite space. They contemplate the phenomena there—included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness—as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. They turn their mind away from those things, and apply it to freedom from death: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ Abiding in that they attain the ending of defilements. If they don’t attain the ending of defilements, with the ending of the five lower fetters they’re reborn spontaneously, because of their passion and love for that meditation. They are extinguished there, and are not liable to return from that world. It’s like an archer or their apprentice who first practices on a straw man or a clay model. At a later time they become a long-distance shooter, a marksman, who shatters large objects. In the same way, take a mendicant who enters and remains in the dimension of infinite space. … ‘The dimension of infinite space is a basis for ending the defilements.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

§3‘The dimension of infinite consciousness is a basis for ending the defilements.’ … ‘The dimension of nothingness is a basis for ending the defilements.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Take a mendicant who, going totally beyond the dimension of infinite consciousness, aware that ‘there is nothing at all’, enters and remains in the dimension of nothingness. They contemplate the phenomena there—included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness—as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. They turn their mind away from those things, and apply it to freedom from death: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ Abiding in that they attain the ending of defilements. If they don’t attain the ending of defilements, with the ending of the five lower fetters they’re reborn spontaneously, because of their passion and love for that meditation. They are extinguished there, and are not liable to return from that world. It’s like an archer or their apprentice who first practices on a straw man or a clay model. At a later time they become a long-distance shooter, a marksman, who shatters large objects. In the same way, take a mendicant who, going totally beyond the dimension of infinite consciousness, aware that ‘there is nothing at all’, enters and remains in the dimension of nothingness. They contemplate the phenomena there—included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness—as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. They turn their mind away from those things, and apply it to freedom from death: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ Abiding in that they attain the ending of defilements. If they don’t attain the ending of defilements, with the ending of the five lower fetters they’re reborn spontaneously, because of their passion and love for that meditation. They are extinguished there, and are not liable to return from that world. ‘The dimension of nothingness is a basis for ending the defilements.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

An explicit limit

§4And so, mendicants, penetration to enlightenment extends as far as attainments with perception. But the two dimensions that depend on these—the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception, and the cessation of perception and feeling—are properly explained by meditators who are skilled in these attainments and skilled in emerging from them, after they’ve entered them and emerged from them.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What does this discourse claim about the first seven progressive attainments?
Correct: B. A doctrinally significant claim about jhāna as insight-basis, not only calm.
Question 2 of 6
What does a mendicant contemplate within each attainment, according to this discourse?
Correct: B. Insight practiced on the attainment's own present phenomena, not elsewhere.
Question 3 of 6
What simile illustrates the skill this insight requires?
Correct: B. Trained skill, developed progressively, matching the insight practiced within absorption.
Question 4 of 6
What happens if a mendicant doesn't fully end the defilements while practicing this way?
Correct: B. A fallback outcome — non-return — short of full liberation.
Question 5 of 6
What explicit limit does this discourse name for the top two attainments?
Correct: B. An explicit boundary the discourse admits for its own insight-method.
Question 6 of 6
Is a setting given for this discourse?
Correct: C. A bare doctrinal teaching, without narrative frame.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0