Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
A brilliant royal steward once organized a kingdom so well that he could be “seen but not heard” by the very kings who depended on him, then renounced it all to teach the four divine abidings to thousands — but the Buddha, revealing he himself was that steward in a former life, adds the crucial correction: that teaching led only as far as the Brahmā-world, while his present teaching, the noble eightfold path, leads all the way to full liberation.
A story arriving from very far away
DN 19 opens simply: the gandhabba (celestial musician) Pañcasikha, lighting up Vulture’s Peak with his own radiance, approaches the Buddha late at night to report something he heard directly from the gods of the thirty-three. What follows is a narrative built like a set of nested boxes. Pañcasikha describes an assembly of gods presided over by Sakka, their king; within that assembly, a being of dazzling brilliance named Sanaṅkumāra appears and speaks; and within Sanaṅkumāra’s speech is the actual story this whole discourse is about — a legend from the deep past concerning a brahmin steward. Only a text this confident in its own structure would delay its real subject through three full layers of reported speech before finally beginning. The effect, intentional or not, is to treat the coming story as something precious enough to be carried carefully, hand to hand, across a great distance before it reaches human ears at all.
Eight genuine praises
Before the legend proper begins, Sakka shares with the assembled gods a set of eight qualities he personally admires in the Buddha: his sympathy for the world, the immediate relevance of his teaching, his precision in distinguishing skillful from unskillful, the way his practice converges smoothly on liberation, his freedom from vanity despite fame and gain, his commitment to solitude without abandoning his students, the consistency between what he says and what he does, and his having gone completely beyond doubt. The list is worth pausing on, because it is not a list of miracles or metaphysical claims — every item is something a careful observer could actually verify by watching how the Buddha lived. Sakka’s admiration is procedural, not credulous.
A steward for seven kings
The legend itself: a brahmin high priest known simply as “the Steward” served King Disampati, and when he died, his son Jotipāla proved so capable in the role that people began calling him the “Great Steward.” When Disampati’s son Reṇu became king together with six allied aristocrats, the Great Steward divided their joint territory into seven precisely equal kingdoms — a feat of fair division and administrative design vivid enough that the text lists the seven capital cities by name. He went on to manage the affairs of all seven realms at once, teaching hymns to brahmins on the side, functioning so smoothly and invisibly that his gifts became the stuff of rumor: people began saying he must be meeting with a god in person, since no merely human administrator could possibly run things this well. This is the discourse’s memorable phrase for supremely skillful, unobtrusive competence — managing so well that the people relying on you barely notice the management is happening at all.
Disenchantment inside success
What makes the Great Steward’s story more than an administrative fable is what happens next. Stung by a reputation he knows is only half-true — he has never actually met a god face to face — he goes on retreat to earn it honestly, and the deity Sanaṅkumāra (called “the Eternal Youth”) duly appears. Rather than asking about worldly success, which he already understands, the Great Steward asks what leads to companionship with Brahmā after death. He receives four qualities in answer: giving up possessiveness, dwelling in solitude, cultivating compassion, and being “free of putrefaction” — a vivid image for the corroding effect of anger, deceit, miserliness, and the other defilements the god lists by name. Having achieved everything the human world can offer, the Great Steward finds himself moved to renounce it, precisely because true success at administering a kingdom is not the same thing as success at addressing what corrodes a mind.
A very long goodbye
The renunciation itself becomes a small comic set piece: when the Great Steward announces his intention to go forth, king after group tries to talk him out of it or at least delay him, offering wealth, women, and eventually a sliding scale of postponement — seven years, six, five, and on down through the months to a mere fortnight — with the Great Steward refusing every offer on the same grounds each time, that death does not wait and that a mind serious about the path cannot keep deferring. He finally agrees to one week, so that his dependents can arrange their own affairs, and when the week is up, an enormous procession of kings, brahmins, wives, and commoners goes forth together with him. It is a portrait of just how disruptive a serious renunciation can be to everyone arranged around the renouncer — and how, in the end, that disruption becomes something people choose to join rather than merely endure.
The line the whole discourse exists to deliver
At the very end, the Buddha reveals that he himself was the Great Steward in that former life, and immediately supplies the qualification that gives the whole sutta its shape: the four divine abidings he taught then — love, compassion, rejoicing, and equanimity — do not, by themselves, lead to disillusionment, dispassion, and extinguishment. They lead only as far as rebirth in the company of Brahmā, a magnificent destination, but still a destination within the cycle of rebirth. Only the noble eightfold path, the Buddha’s present teaching, goes the rest of the way. It is a striking piece of self-criticism embedded in what otherwise reads as a story about the Buddha’s own past brilliance — a reminder that even this teacher’s finest prior effort fell short of what he now offers, and that admiration for a teaching’s beauty is not the same thing as confirmation that it liberates.
Key terms
The text
Pañcasikha’s offer
§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, on the Vulture’s Peak Mountain. Then, late at night, the centaur Pañcasikha, lighting up the entire Vulture’s Peak, went up to the Buddha, bowed, stood to one side, and said to him, “Sir, I would tell you of what I heard and learned directly from the gods of the thirty-three.” “Tell me, Pañcasikha,” said the Buddha.
1. The Council of the Gods
§2–3“Sir, it was more than a few days ago—on the fifteenth day sabbath on the full moon day at the invitation to admonish held at the end of the rainy season—when all the gods of the thirty-three were sitting together in the Hall of Clear Right. A large assembly of gods was sitting all around, and the four great kings were seated at the four quarters. The Great King Dhataraṭṭha was seated to the east, facing west, in front of his gods. The Great King Virūḷhaka was seated to the south, facing north, in front of his gods. The Great King Virūpakkha was seated to the west, facing east, in front of his gods. The Great King Vessavaṇa was seated to the north, facing south, in front of his gods. When the gods of the thirty-three have a gathering like this, that is how they are seated. After that come our seats.
Sir, those gods who had been recently reborn in the company of the thirty-three after leading the spiritual life under the Buddha outshine the other gods in beauty and glory. The gods of the thirty-three became uplifted and overjoyed at that, full of rapture and happiness, saying, ‘The heavenly hosts swell, while the titan hosts dwindle!’ Seeing the joy of those gods, Sakka, lord of gods, celebrated with these verses:
‘The gods rejoice—the thirty-three with their Lord—revering the Realized One, and the clear rightness of the teaching; and seeing the new gods, so beautiful and glorious, who have come here after leading the spiritual life under the Buddha! They outshine the others in beauty, glory, and lifespan. Here are the distinguished disciples of he whose wisdom is vast. Seeing this, they delight—the thirty-three with their Lord—revering the Realized One, and the clear rightness of the teaching!’
The gods of the thirty-three became even more uplifted and overjoyed at that, full of rapture and happiness, saying, ‘The heavenly hosts swell, while the titan hosts dwindle!’
2. Eight Genuine Praises
§4Seeing the joy of those gods, Sakka, lord of gods, addressed them, ‘Gentlemen, would you like to hear eight genuine praises of the Buddha?’ ‘Indeed we would, sir.’ Then Sakka proffered these eight genuine praises of the Buddha:
§5–12‘What do the good gods of the thirty-three think? How the Buddha has acted for the welfare and happiness of the people, out of sympathy for the world, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans! I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who has such sympathy for the world, apart from the Buddha.
Also, the Buddha has explained the teaching well—apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who explains such a relevant teaching, apart from the Buddha.
Also, the Buddha has well described what is skillful and what is unskillful, what is blameworthy and what is blameless, what should be cultivated and what should not be cultivated, what is inferior and what is superior, and what has a portion of dark or bright. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who so clearly describes all these things, apart from the Buddha.
Also, the Buddha has well described the practice that leads to extinguishment for his disciples. And extinguishment converges with the practice, as the waters of the Ganges join together and converge with the waters of the Yamunā. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who so clearly describes the practice that leads to extinguishment for his disciples, apart from the Buddha.
Also, possessions and popularity have accrued to the Buddha, so much that you’d think it would thrill even the aristocrats. But he takes his food free of vanity. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who takes their food so free of vanity, apart from the Buddha.
Also, the Buddha has gained companions, both trainees who are practicing, and those with defilements ended who have completed their journey. The Buddha is committed to the joy of solitude, but doesn’t send them away. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, so committed to the joy of solitude, apart from the Buddha.
Also, the Buddha does as he says, and says as he does, thus: he does as he says, and says as he does. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who so practices in line with the teaching, apart from the Buddha.
Also, the Buddha has gone beyond doubt and got rid of indecision. He has achieved all he wished for regarding the fundamental goal of the spiritual life. I don’t see any Teacher, past or present, who has achieved these things, apart from the Buddha.’ These are the eight genuine praises of the Buddha proffered by Sakka. Hearing them, the gods of the thirty-three became even more uplifted and overjoyed.
§13–14Then some gods thought, ‘If only four fully awakened Buddhas might arise in the world and teach the Dhamma, just like the Blessed One! That would be for the welfare and happiness of the people, out of sympathy for the world, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans!’ Other gods thought, ‘Let alone four fully awakened Buddhas; if only three fully awakened Buddhas, or two fully awakened Buddhas might arise in the world and teach the Dhamma, just like the Blessed One! That would be for the welfare and happiness of the people…’
When they said this, Sakka said, ‘It is impossible, gentlemen, for two perfected ones, fully awakened Buddhas to arise in the same solar system at the same time. May that Blessed One be healthy and well, and remain with us for a long time!’ Then the gods of the thirty-three, having considered and deliberated on the matter for which they were seated together in the Hall of Clear Right, advised and instructed the four great kings on the subject. Each one, having been advised, stood at his own seat without leaving. The Kings were instructed, and heeded good advice. With clear and peaceful minds, they stood by their own seats.
§15Then in the northern quarter a magnificent light arose and radiance appeared, surpassing the glory of the gods. Then Sakka, lord of gods, addressed the gods of the thirty-three, ‘As indicated by the signs—light arising and radiance appearing—the Divinity will appear. For this is the harbinger for the appearance of the Divinity, namely light arising and radiance appearing.’
3. On Sanaṅkumāra
§16–19Then the gods of the thirty-three sat in their own seats, saying, ‘We shall find out what has caused that light, and only when we have realized it shall we go to it.’ And the four great kings did likewise, and agreed in unison.
When the divinity Sanaṅkumāra appears to the gods of the thirty-three, he does so after manifesting in a solid life-form, for a Divinity’s normal appearance is imperceptible in the visual range of the gods of the thirty-three. When the divinity Sanaṅkumāra appears, he outshines the other gods in beauty and glory, as a golden statue outshines the human form. Not a single god in that assembly greets him by bowing down or rising up or inviting him to a seat; they all sit silently on their couches with their cupped palms raised, thinking, ‘Now the divinity Sanaṅkumāra will sit on the couch of whatever god he chooses.’ And the god on whose couch the Divinity sits is overjoyed and brimming with happiness, like a king on the day of his coronation.
Seeing the joy of those gods, the divinity Sanaṅkumāra celebrated with the same verses Sakka had spoken. That is the topic on which the divinity Sanaṅkumāra spoke. And while he was speaking on that topic, his voice had eight qualities: it was clear, comprehensible, charming, audible, lucid, undistorted, deep, and resonant. He makes sure his voice is intelligible as far as the assembly goes, but the sound doesn’t extend outside the assembly. When someone has a voice like this, they’re said to have the voice of the Divinity.
Then the gods of the thirty-three said to the divinity Sanaṅkumāra, ‘Good, Great Divinity! Having appraised this, we rejoice. And there are the eight genuine praises of the Buddha spoken by Sakka—having appraised them, too, we rejoice.’ Then the Divinity asked to hear those eight genuine praises for himself, and Sakka repeated them for him word for word. Hearing them, the divinity Sanaṅkumāra was uplifted and overjoyed, full of rapture and happiness.
Then the divinity Sanaṅkumāra manifested in a solid life-form, taking on the appearance of the youth Pañcasikha, and appeared to the gods of the thirty-three. Rising into the air, he sat cross-legged in the sky, like a strong man might sit cross-legged on a well-appointed couch or on level ground. There he addressed the gods of the thirty-three:
4. The Story of the Steward
§28–29‘What do the gods of the thirty-three think about the extent of the Buddha’s great wisdom? Once upon a time, there was a king named Disampati. He had a brahmin high priest named the Steward. Disampati’s son was the prince named Reṇu, while the Steward’s son was the student named Jotipāla. There were Reṇu the prince, Jotipāla the student, and six other aristocrats; these eight became friends.
In due course the brahmin Steward passed away. At his passing, King Disampati lamented, “At a time when I have relinquished all my duties to the brahmin Steward and amuse myself, supplied and provided with the five kinds of sensual stimulation, he passes away!” When he said this, Prince Reṇu said to him, “Sire, don’t lament too much at the Steward’s passing. He has a son named Jotipāla, who is even more astute and expert than his father. He should manage the affairs that were managed by his father.” “Is that so, my prince?” “That is so, sire.”
5. The Story of the Great Steward
§30–31So King Disampati addressed one of his men, “Please, my man, go to the student Jotipāla, and say to him, ‘Best wishes, Jotipāla! You are summoned by King Disampati; he wants to see you.’” “Yes, Your Majesty,” replied that man, and did as he was asked. Then Jotipāla went to the king and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side, and the king said to him, “May you, Jotipāla, manage my affairs—please don’t turn me down! I shall appoint you to your father’s position, and anoint you as Steward.” “Yes, worthy sir,” replied Jotipāla.
So the king anointed him as Steward and appointed him to his father’s position. After his appointment, the Steward Jotipāla managed both the affairs that his father had managed, and other affairs that his father had not managed. He organized both the works that his father had organized, and other works that his father had not organized. When people noticed this they said, “The brahmin is indeed a Steward, a Great Steward!” And that’s how the student Jotipāla came to be known as the Great Steward.
Dividing the realm
§32–36Then the Great Steward went to the six aristocrats and said, “King Disampati is old, elderly and senior, advanced in years, and has reached the final stage of life. Who knows how long he has to live? It’s likely that when he passes away the king-makers will anoint Prince Reṇu as king. Come, sirs, go to Prince Reṇu and say, ‘Prince Reṇu, we are your friends, dear, beloved, and cherished. We have shared your joys and sorrows… If you should gain kingship, share it with us.’” “Yes, worthy sir,” replied the six aristocrats. They went to Prince Reṇu and put the proposal to him. The prince replied, “Who else, sirs, in my realm ought to prosper if not you? If I gain kingship, I will share it with you all.”
In due course King Disampati passed away. At his passing, the king-makers anointed Prince Reṇu as king. But after being anointed, King Reṇu amused himself, supplied and provided with the five kinds of sensual stimulation. Then the Great Steward went to the six aristocrats and reminded them to press King Reṇu on his old promise. They went to King Reṇu and said, “Worthy sir, King Disampati has passed away, and you have been anointed as king. Do you remember what you said?” “I remember, sirs. Who is able to neatly divide into seven equal parts this great land, so broad in the north and narrow as the front of a cart in the south?” “Who else, sir, if not the Great Steward?”
So King Reṇu summoned the Great Steward and said, “Come, let the good Steward neatly divide into seven equal parts this great land, so broad in the north and narrow as the front of a cart in the south.” “Yes, worthy sir,” replied the Great Steward, and did as he was asked.
All were arranged like the fronts of carts, and right in the middle was King Reṇu’s nation. Dantapura for the Kaliṅgas; Potana for the Assakas; Māhissatī for the Avantis; Roruka for the Sovīras; Mithilā for the Videhas; Campā was laid out for the Aṅgas; and Varanasi for the Kāsis: these were laid out by the Steward. Then those six aristocrats were delighted with their respective gains, having achieved all they wished for: “We have received exactly what we wanted, what we wished for, what we desired, what we yearned for.” Sattabhū and Brahmadatta, Vessabhū and Bharata, Reṇu and the two Dhataraṭṭhas: these were the seven Bhāratas.
A good reputation
§37–38Then the six aristocrats approached the Great Steward and said, “Steward, just as you are King Reṇu’s friend, dear, beloved, and cherished, you are also our friend. Would you manage our affairs? Please don’t turn us down!” “Yes, worthy sirs,” replied the Great Steward. Then the Great Steward managed the realms of the seven kings. And he taught seven well-to-do brahmins, and seven hundred bathed initiates to recite the hymns.
After some time he got this good reputation, “The Great Steward sees the Divinity in person! The Great Steward discusses, converses, and consults with the Divinity in person!” The Great Steward thought, “I have the reputation of seeing the Divinity in person, and discussing with him in person. But I don’t. I have heard that brahmins of the past who were elderly and senior, the tutors of tutors, said: ‘Whoever goes on retreat for the four months of the rainy season and practices the absorption on compassion sees the Divinity and discusses with him.’ Why don’t I do that?”
§39–43So the Great Steward went to King Reṇu and said, “Sir, I wish to go on retreat for the four months of the rainy season and practice the absorption on compassion. No one should approach me, except for the one who serves my meal.” “Please do so, Steward, at your convenience.” He put the same proposal to the six aristocrats, to the seven well-to-do brahmins and seven hundred bathed initiates — adding that they should rehearse and teach each other the hymns in the meantime — and to his forty equal wives, and received the same reply each time.
Then the Great Steward had a new ceremonial hall built to the east of his citadel, where he went on retreat for the four months of the rainy season and practiced the absorption on compassion. And no one approached him except the one who served his meals. But then, when the four months had passed, the Great Steward became dissatisfied and anxious: “I have heard that brahmins of the past said that whoever goes on retreat for the four months of the rainy season and practices the absorption on compassion sees the Divinity and discusses with him. But I neither see the Divinity nor discuss with him.”
A discussion with the Divinity
§44–46And then the divinity Sanaṅkumāra, knowing the Great Steward’s train of thought, as easily as a strong person would extend or contract their arm, vanished from the realm of divinity and reappeared in the Great Steward’s presence. At that, the Great Steward became frightened, scared, his hair standing on end, as he had never seen such a sight before. So he addressed the divinity Sanaṅkumāra in verse: “Who might you be, sir, so beautiful, glorious, majestic? Not knowing, I ask—how am I to know who you are?” “In the realm of divinity they know me as ‘The Eternal Youth’. All the gods know me thus, and so you should know me, Steward.” “A Divinity deserves a seat and water, foot-salve, and sweet cakes. Sir, I ask you to please accept these gifts of hospitality.” “I accept the gifts of hospitality of which you speak. I grant you the opportunity to ask whatever you desire—about welfare and benefit in this life, or happiness in lives to come.”
Then the Great Steward thought, “the divinity Sanaṅkumāra has granted me an opportunity. Should I ask him about what is beneficial for this life or lives to come?” Then he thought, “I’m skilled in what is beneficial for this life, and others even ask me about it. Why don’t I ask the Divinity about the benefit that specifically applies to lives to come?” So he addressed the divinity Sanaṅkumāra in verse: “I’m in doubt, so I ask the Divinity—who is free of doubt—about things one may learn from another. Standing on what, training in what may a mortal reach the deathless realm of divinity?” “He among mankind, O brahmin, has given up possessiveness, at one, compassionate, free of putrefaction, and refraining from sex. Standing on that, training in that a mortal may reach the deathless realm of divinity.”
“Sir, I understand what ‘giving up possessiveness’ means. It’s when someone gives up a large or small fortune, and a large or small family circle. They shave off hair and beard, dress in ocher robes, and go forth from the lay life to homelessness. That’s how I understand ‘giving up possessiveness’. Sir, I understand what ‘at one’ means. It’s when someone frequents a secluded lodging—a wilderness, the root of a tree, a hill, a ravine, a mountain cave, a charnel ground, a forest, the open air, a heap of straw. That’s how I understand ‘at one’. Sir, I understand what ‘compassionate’ means. It’s when someone meditates spreading a heart full of compassion to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth—above, below, across, everywhere, all around—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. That’s how I understand ‘compassionate’. But I don’t understand what you say about putrefaction. What among mankind, O the Divinity, is putrefaction? I don’t understand, so tell me, attentive one: wrapped in what do people stink, headed for hell, shut out of the realm of divinity?” “Anger, lies, cheating, and treachery, miserliness, vanity, jealousy, desire, stinginess, harassing others, greed, hate, vanity, and delusion—those bound to such things are not devoid of putrefaction; they’re headed for hell, shut out of the realm of divinity.” “As I understand what you say about putrefaction, it’s not easy to quell while living at home. I shall go forth from the lay life to homelessness!” “Please do so, Steward, at your convenience.”
Informing King Reṇu
§47So the Great Steward went to King Reṇu and said, “Worthy sir, please now find another high priest to manage the affairs of state for you. I wish to go forth from the lay life to homelessness. As I understand what the Divinity says about putrefaction, it’s not easy to quell while living at home. I announce to King Reṇu, the lord of the land: you must learn how to rule, for I no longer care for my ministry.” “If you’re lacking any pleasures, I’ll supply them for you. I’ll protect you from any harm, for I command the nation’s army. You are my father, I am your son! O Steward, please don’t leave!” “I’m lacking no pleasures, and no-one is harming me. I’ve heard a non-human voice, so I no longer care for lay life.” “What was that non-human like? What did he say to you, hearing which you would abandon our house and all our people?” “Before entering this retreat, I only liked to sacrifice. I kindled the sacred flame, strewn about with kusa grass. But then the Divinity the Eternal Youth appeared to me from the realm of divinity. He answered my question, hearing which I no longer care for lay life.” “I have faith, O Steward, in that of which you speak. Having heard a non-human voice, what else could you do? We will follow your example, Steward, be my Teacher! Like a gem of beryl—flawless, immaculate, beautiful—that’s how pure we shall live, in the Steward’s dispensation. If the Steward is going forth from the lay life to homelessness, we shall do so too. Your destiny shall be ours.”
Informing the six aristocrats
§48–55Then the Great Steward went to the six aristocrats and said the same, adding that as he understood what the Divinity said about putrefaction, it wasn’t easy to quell while living at home, so he would go forth. Then the six aristocrats withdrew to one side and thought up a plan: “These brahmins are greedy for wealth. Why don’t we bestow him with wealth?” They returned and said, “In these seven kingdoms there is abundant wealth. We’ll get you as much as you want.” “Enough, sirs. I already have abundant wealth, owing to my lords. Giving up all that, I shall go forth.” They withdrew again and thought, “These brahmins are greedy for women. Why don’t we bestow him with women?” They returned and said, “In these seven kingdoms there are many women. We’ll get you as many as you want.” “Enough, sirs. I already have forty equal wives. Giving up all them, I shall go forth.”
“If the Steward is going forth from the lay life to homelessness, we shall do so too. Your destiny shall be ours.” “If you all give up sensual pleasures, to which ordinary people are attached, exert yourselves, being strong, and possessing the power of patience. This path is the straight path, this path is supreme. Guarded by the good, the true teaching leads to rebirth in the realm of divinity.”
“Well then, sir, please wait for seven years. When seven years have passed, we shall go forth with you. Your destiny shall be ours.” “Seven years is too long, sirs. I cannot wait that long. Who knows what will happen to the living? We are heading to the next life. We must be thoughtful and wake up! We must do what’s good and lead the spiritual life, for no-one born can escape death. I shall go forth.” The aristocrats lowered their request in the same terms, year by year—six, five, four, three, two, and one—and then month by month—seven down to one—and finally to a mere fortnight, and each time the Great Steward gave essentially the same answer: too long, and death does not wait. “A fortnight is too long, sirs. I cannot wait that long… I shall go forth from the lay life to homelessness.” “Well then, sir, please wait for a week, so that we can instruct our sons and brothers in kingship. When a week has passed, we shall go forth. Your destiny shall be ours.” “A week is not too long, sirs. I will wait that long.”
Informing the brahmins
§56Then the Great Steward also went to the seven well-to-do brahmins and seven hundred bathed initiates and said, “Good fellows, please now find another tutor to teach you to recite the hymns. I wish to go forth from the lay life to homelessness.” “Please don’t go forth! The life of one gone forth is of little influence or profit, whereas the life of a brahmin is of great influence and profit.” “Please, good fellows, don’t say that. Who has greater influence and profit than myself? For now I am like a king to kings, like the Divinity to brahmins, like a deity to householders. Giving up all that, I shall go forth.” “If the Steward is going forth from the lay life to homelessness, we shall do so too. Your destiny shall be ours.”
Informing the wives
§57Then the Great Steward went to his forty equal wives and said, “Ladies, please do whatever you wish, whether returning to your own families, or finding another husband. I wish to go forth from the lay life to homelessness.” “You are the only family we want! You are the only husband we want! If you are going forth from the lay life to homelessness, we shall do so too. Your destiny shall be ours.”
The Great Steward goes forth
§58–60When a week had passed, the Great Steward shaved off his hair and beard, dressed in ocher robes, and went forth from the lay life to homelessness. And when he had gone forth, the seven anointed aristocrat kings, the seven brahmins with seven hundred initiates, the forty equal wives, and many thousands of aristocrats, brahmins, householders, and many harem women shaved off their hair and beards, dressed in ocher robes, and went forth from the lay life to homelessness. Escorted by that assembly, the Great Steward wandered on tour among the villages, towns, and capital cities. And at that time, whenever he arrived at a village or town, he was like a king to kings, like the Divinity to brahmins, like a deity to householders. And whenever people sneezed or tripped over they’d say: “Homage to the Great Steward! Homage to the high priest for the seven!”
And the Great Steward meditated spreading a heart full of love to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth—above, below, across, everywhere, all around—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. He meditated spreading a heart full of compassion… rejoicing… and equanimity in the same way to the whole world. And he taught his disciples the path to rebirth in the company of Divinity.
Those of his disciples who completely understood the Great Steward’s instructions, at the breaking up of the body, after death, were reborn in the realm of divinity. Of those disciples who only partly understood his instructions, some were reborn in the company of the gods who control what is created by others, while some were reborn among the gods who love to create, or the joyful gods, or the gods of Yama, or the gods of the thirty-three, or the gods of the four great kings. And at the very least they swelled the hosts of the centaurs. And so the going forth of all those gentlemen was not in vain, was not barren, but was fruitful and fertile.’ Do you remember this, Blessed One?”
The Buddha’s correction
§61–62“I remember, Pañcasikha. I myself was the brahmin Great Steward at that time. And I taught those disciples the path to rebirth in the company of Divinity. But that spiritual path of mine doesn’t lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment. It only leads as far as rebirth in the realm of divinity. But this spiritual path does lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment. And what is the spiritual path that leads to extinguishment? It is simply this noble eightfold path, that is: right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right immersion. This is the spiritual path that leads to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.
Those of my disciples who completely understand my instructions realize the undefiled freedom of heart and freedom by wisdom in this very life, and live having realized it with their own insight due to the ending of defilements. Of those disciples who only partly understand my instructions, some, with the ending of the five lower fetters, become reborn spontaneously; they are extinguished there, and are not liable to return from that world. Some, with the ending of three fetters, and the weakening of greed, hate, and delusion, become once-returners, who come back to this world once only, then make an end of suffering. And some, with the ending of three fetters, become stream-enterers, not liable to be reborn in the underworld, assured, destined for awakening. And so the going forth of all those gentlemen was not in vain, was not barren, but was fruitful and fertile.”
That is what the Buddha said. Delighted, the centaur Pañcasikha approved and agreed with what the Buddha said. He bowed and respectfully circled the Buddha, keeping him on his right, before vanishing right there.
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.