Itivuttaka · Discourse 110

Walking

Carasutta

Setting
No narrative frame — no time, place, or listener is named
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants collectively
Form
A fourfold repetition (walking, standing, sitting, lying down awake), given twice — for tolerating and for abandoning an unwholesome thought — then a two-stanza verse
Length
~1–2 minutes to read
Position
11th of 13 discourses in the Chapter on the Brahmin’s Offering of the Teaching, the sole chapter of the Book of the Fours (Iti 100–112)
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — repetitive by design, and easy to follow once the pattern is seen

Why this discourse

A single test, applied four times over: whatever posture a mendicant’s body happens to be in — walking, standing, sitting, or lying down awake — does an unwholesome thought get tolerated, or does it get given up? The discourse repeats the same scenario in all four postures, twice over, once for the mendicant who tolerates such thoughts and once for the one who doesn’t, before a verse names the stakes: nothing less than whether the highest awakening is even reachable.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A mendicant who lets a sensual, malicious, or cruel thought stand — tolerating it rather than giving it up, in any of the four postures the body can be in — is “not keen or prudent, always lazy, and lacking energy”; a mendicant who instead gives up, eliminates, and obliterates such a thought in each of those same four postures is “keen and prudent, always energetic and resolute.”

Four postures, one question repeated

The four postures named — walking, standing, sitting, and lying down while awake — are the standard fourfold division of ordinary bodily activity used throughout the early texts (they open the body-contemplation section of the Satipaṭṭhāna teachings as well). This discourse doesn’t treat any one posture as special; the same test is applied identically in all four, as if to insist that mind-training cannot be confined to formal meditation sitting and then set aside the moment a mendicant stands up or lies down. Whatever the body happens to be doing, the question is the same: has an unwholesome thought that has arisen been tolerated, or dealt with?

Four verbs for “giving up”

The description of what the diligent mendicant does with an unwholesome thought is notably not left at a single verb: they “give it up, get rid of it, eliminate it, and obliterate it.” Four near-synonyms, stacked together, describing what sounds less like a single decisive act and more like a repeated, thorough effort applied until the thought is genuinely gone rather than merely suppressed for a moment. The mendicant who instead “tolerates” the thought is described with an equally deliberate string of negatives: they do not give it up, get rid of it, eliminate it, or obliterate it — the same four verbs, simply left undone.

The stakes, named in verse

The closing verse raises what might otherwise read as a discourse about diligence into something considerably higher-stakes: the mendicant who thinks “a bad thought tied to the domestic life” in any posture “is practicing the wrong way, lost among things that delude,” and is, in the verse’s own words, “incapable of experiencing the highest awakening.” The mendicant who has “calmed their thoughts, loving peace of mind,” whatever the posture, is by contrast “capable” of it. Nothing less than the highest awakening itself, the verse insists, turns on how these small, constantly repeated moments — a thought arising while merely standing, or lying down — are actually handled.

Key terms

cara — “walking”: the first of the four postures named, and the discourse’s own Pāli title.
iriyāpatha — the four postures as a set (walking, standing, sitting, lying down), the standard division of ordinary bodily activity used across the early texts.
kāmavitakka, byāpādavitakka, vihiṁsāvitakka — thoughts of sensuality, ill will, and cruelty: the three specific unwholesome thoughts named in each of the four postures.
gehanissita — “tied to domestic” or household “life”: the verse’s description of the bad thought that disqualifies a mendicant from the highest awakening.
pahitatta — “resolute” or wholly dedicated: the closing description of the mendicant who abandons unwholesome thoughts in every posture.

The text

The discourse in full, given complete: the fourfold repetition for both the lax and the diligent mendicant, and the closing verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.

§2“Mendicants, suppose a mendicant has a sensual, malicious, or cruel thought while walking. They tolerate it and don’t give it up, get rid of it, eliminate it, and obliterate it. Such a mendicant is said to be ‘not keen or prudent, always lazy, and lacking energy’ when walking.

§3–5Suppose a mendicant has a sensual, malicious, or cruel thought while standing… sitting… or when lying down while awake. They tolerate it and don’t give it up, get rid of it, eliminate it, and obliterate it. Such a mendicant is said to be ‘not keen or prudent, always lazy, and lacking energy’ when lying down while awake.

§6Suppose a mendicant has a sensual, malicious, or cruel thought while walking. They don’t tolerate them, but give them up, get rid of them, eliminate them, and obliterate them. Such a mendicant is said to be ‘keen and prudent, always energetic and resolute’ when walking.

§7–9Suppose a mendicant has a sensual, malicious, or cruel thought while standing… sitting… or when lying down while awake. They don’t tolerate it, but give it up, get rid of it, eliminate it, and obliterate it. Such a mendicant is said to be ‘keen and prudent, always energetic and resolute’ when lying down while awake.”

The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:

§10–12“Whether walking or standing, sitting or lying down, one who thinks a bad thought to do with the domestic life is practicing the wrong way, lost among things that delude; such a mendicant is incapable of experiencing the highest awakening. But one who, whether standing or walking, sitting or lying down, has calmed their thoughts, loving peace of mind; such a mendicant is capable of experiencing the highest awakening.”

§13This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How many postures does this discourse name for testing whether a mendicant tolerates an unwholesome thought?
Correct: C. Walking, standing, sitting, and lying down while awake.
Question 2 of 10
Which three kinds of thought does the discourse name in each posture?
Correct: B. Kāmavitakka, byāpādavitakka, vihiṁsāvitakka.
Question 3 of 10
How is the mendicant who tolerates such a thought without giving it up described?
Correct: D. The same phrase repeats for all four postures.
Question 4 of 10
What four things does the diligent mendicant do with an unwholesome thought, according to the text?
Correct: A. Four stacked near-synonyms describing a thorough effort.
Question 5 of 10
According to the closing verse, what happens to the mendicant who thinks "a bad thought tied to the domestic life" in any posture?
Correct: C. The verse states the stakes plainly.
Question 6 of 10
How does the verse describe the mendicant who is capable of the highest awakening?
Correct: B. The positive mirror of the disqualified mendicant.
Question 7 of 10
Does this discourse open with a narrative frame?
Correct: A. As with nearly every discourse in this collection.
Question 8 of 10
According to the reading guide, what does the fourfold repetition of the same test across all four postures suggest?
Correct: D. The same question is asked identically in all four postures.
Question 9 of 10
According to the reading guide, where else in the early texts does this same fourfold division of postures (iriyāpatha) appear?
Correct: B. A standard division used throughout the early texts.
Question 10 of 10
Where does this discourse fall within the Itivuttaka's Book of the Fours?
Correct: C. It follows Iti 109 and precedes Iti 111, its closest companion piece.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0