Itivuttaka · Discourse 40

Knowledge

Vijjāsutta

Setting
None given — no narrative frame, as with almost every discourse in this collection
Speaker
The Buddha alone
Form
A two-part prose statement about sequence, restated in a three-stanza verse
Position
The Book of the Twos, Chapter Two, the 3rd of its discourses; the source text marks its end as the close of the Itivuttaka’s first recitation section (paṭhama-bhāṇavāra)
Length
< 1 minute to read
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a compact claim about sequence, worth reading against the wider canon’s longer causal chain

What comes first: ignorance, or the lack of shame that follows it

This discourse makes a claim about sequence: ignorance does not simply accompany unskillful action, it precedes it, with the absence of conscience and prudence following along afterward — and knowledge does the same for skillful action, in reverse. It is a compact statement about what actually starts the chain, worth reading against the wider canon’s much longer account of exactly that kind of chain.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Ignorance comes first, before the arising of unskillful qualities, with lack of conscience and lack of prudence following along after; knowledge comes first, before the arising of skillful qualities, with conscience and prudence following along after.

Pubbaṅgama — what goes first

The key word describing ignorance’s (and knowledge’s) role is pubbaṅgama, “going before, a forerunner.” The claim is not merely that ignorance and moral carelessness travel together; it specifies a direction — ignorance leads, and the erosion of conscience and prudence trails behind it, “following along.”

Hirī and ottappa, the two guardians

Conscience (hirī, an inner sense of shame at wrongdoing) and prudence (ottappa, dread of the consequences of wrongdoing) are traditionally described elsewhere in the canon as the world’s two guardians, the qualities that keep ordinary decency intact. Here they are treated as downstream effects rather than as the starting point — a person does not lose conscience and prudence for no reason; ignorance is what erodes them first.

A short chain, not the twelve-link one

Readers familiar with the classical twelve-link chain of dependent origination — which also opens with avijjā, ignorance, as its first link — will recognize the shape here, though this discourse gives only a short, two-step version of it, ending in the arising of unskillful or skillful qualities rather than tracing the fuller path through to suffering itself.

The verse’s diagnosis, and its remedy

The verse widens the frame: all “bad destinies,” in this world or the next, are said to be rooted in ignorance, compounded with greed and desire; a person of corrupt wishes, lacking conscience, brims with wickedness and heads for “a place of loss.” The remedy named is exactly the reverse of the diagnosis: dispelling desire, greed, and ignorance, and arousing knowledge in their place.

Key terms

avijjā — “ignorance”: named here as the forerunner (pubbaṅgama) of unskillful qualities, with the erosion of conscience and prudence following.
vijjā — “knowledge”: the positive counterpart, forerunner of skillful qualities.
hirī — “conscience, moral shame”: one of the “two guardians of the world” in the wider canon, here named as a downstream effect of knowledge, or, absent, of ignorance.
ottappa — “prudence, moral dread of wrongdoing”: paired with hirī throughout the canon as the second guardian.
pubbaṅgama — “forerunner, what goes before”: the term specifying that ignorance, or knowledge, leads, rather than merely accompanies, what follows.

The text

The discourse in full — a compact statement about sequence and its widening, three-stanza restating verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.

§2“Mendicants, ignorance precedes the attainment of unskillful qualities, with lack of conscience and prudence following along. Knowledge precedes the attainment of skillful qualities, with conscience and prudence following along.” The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:

§3“Bad destinies of whatever kind,
in this world or the next,
are all rooted in ignorance,
compounded of greed and desire.

§4Since one of corrupt wishes is
unconscientious, lacking regard for others,
they brim with much wickedness,
which sends them to a place of loss.

§5Therefore, dispelling desire
and greed and ignorance,
a mendicant arousing knowledge
would abandon all bad destinies.”

§6This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
According to this discourse, what precedes the attainment of unskillful qualities?
Correct: B. Ignorance is named as the forerunner, not merely a companion, of unskillful qualities.
Question 2 of 10
What precedes the attainment of skillful qualities, according to the text?
Correct: C. This is the exact positive mirror of the discourse’s first claim.
Question 3 of 10
According to the reading guide, what does pubbaṅgama specify, beyond simple accompaniment?
Correct: A. The word means “forerunner, going before.”
Question 4 of 10
According to the reading guide, what are hirī and ottappa traditionally called elsewhere in the canon?
Correct: D. Conscience and prudence are said to keep ordinary decency intact.
Question 5 of 10
According to the verse, what are “bad destinies of whatever kind” said to be rooted in?
Correct: B. The verse widens the prose statement into a fuller diagnosis.
Question 6 of 10
What remedy does the verse’s final stanza prescribe?
Correct: C. The remedy is the exact reverse of the diagnosis given in the previous stanza.
Question 7 of 10
According to the reading guide, what does this discourse share with the classical twelve-link chain of dependent origination?
Correct: A. This discourse ends at the arising of unskillful or skillful qualities, not the fuller chain through to suffering.
Question 8 of 10
Where does this discourse fall within the Book of the Twos, and what else does the source text mark at its end?
Correct: D. This is a manuscript-recitation marker, distinct from the chapter (vagga) divisions.
Question 9 of 10
Is any narrative setting or specific audience named in this discourse?
Correct: B. The text opens directly with the fixed attribution formula.
Question 10 of 10
What is this discourse’s exact closing attribution line?
Correct: C. This fixed closing formula ends every discourse in the collection.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0