Itivuttaka · Book of the Threes, Chapter Two · Iti 69

Greed (2nd)

Dutiyarāgasutta

Setting
None given — no place, or occasion; unusually, the Pali prose specifies “any monk or nun” rather than the more general address used elsewhere in this chapter
Speakers
The Buddha alone; the Itivuttaka’s bipartite form never includes an interlocutor
Form
A mirrored conditional statement built around an extended ocean metaphor, restated across two dense verse stanzas
Length
Under a minute to read the passage itself
Parallels
No complete Chinese Itivuttaka survives; a partial parallel collection exists in Tibetan translation, with scattered individual parallels across the Āgamas, none specifically identified for this short discourse
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — the imagery is vivid, though the metaphor is layered several qualifiers deep

Why this discourse

This is the last discourse in Chapter Two of the Book of the Threes, and it closes the chapter with its most elaborate image yet: the same three unwholesome roots named in the previous discourse — greed, hate, and delusion — recast as a vast, dangerous ocean, complete with waves, whirlpools, and sea-monsters, that most beings have never crossed. Whoever has given up the three roots, the prose says, has crossed that ocean already and “stands on solid ground.” The Pali original, worth noting, specifies this can be “any monk or nun” — a detail this English rendering folds into the more general “whoever.”

Reading guide

The same three roots, an ocean this time

Like the discourse just before it, this one turns on greed, hate, and delusion (rāga, dosa, moha) left ungiven-up or given up. But where Greed (1st) pictured being “trapped” in Māra’s snare, this discourse reaches for a much more elaborate image: an ocean “with its waves and whirlpools, its saltwater crocodiles and monsters” (saūmi, savīci, sāvaṭṭa, sagaha, sarakkhasa — the Pali stacks qualifier upon qualifier). Whoever has not given up the three roots has simply never crossed this ocean; whoever has, has “crossed over and gone to the far shore,” and “stands on solid ground.”

Monks and nuns, named specifically in the Pali

One detail is worth flagging directly from the source: where this English translation reads simply “whoever,” the underlying Pali text specifies bhikkhu vā bhikkhuniyā vā — “any monk or any nun.” The more general English wording is a smooth, readable choice, but it obscures a genuine, specific detail in the original: the teaching is addressed to, and applies equally to, both the male and female monastic orders by name.

Crossing to “solid ground”

The verse extends the same imagery across two full stanzas — longer and denser than almost anything else in this short chapter. Those in whom greed, hate, and ignorance have faded away “have crossed the ocean so hard to cross,” “slipped their chains, given up death, and have no attachments,” “given up suffering, so there are no more future lives.” The final line calls this person someone who “cannot be defined,” who has “confounded the King of Death” — picking up the same idea of evading any further reckoning seen at the close of Periods, several suttas earlier.

A vivid, dense stanza pair closes the chapter

Structurally, this is one of the most elaborate discourses in the ten covered here: two full verse stanzas, eight lines in total, built almost entirely around one extended image rather than a simple restatement of the prose. As the closing discourse of Chapter Two — a chapter that opened with the plain list of “three eyes” in Iti 61 — it ends on its most imagistically ambitious note.

The form itself

As throughout this collection, Greed (2nd) opens with “This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard,” states its teaching in prose, restates and extends it across two verse stanzas, and closes with a near-mirror of the opening line. Beyond the specific mention of monks and nuns, no place or occasion is named — nothing narrative frames it further.

Key terms

rāga, dosa, moha/avijjā — greed, hate, and delusion/ignorance: the same three unwholesome roots named in the previous discourse.
samuddaṁ saūmiṁ savīciṁ sāvaṭṭaṁ sagahaṁ sarakkhasaṁ — “the ocean with its waves, whirlpools, saltwater crocodiles, and monsters”: the discourse’s extended central image.
brāhmaṇa — used here not as a birth-caste but as an epithet for one who has “crossed over” and “stands on solid ground.”
apunabbhava — “no more future lives”: the verse’s description of what follows from giving up suffering entirely.
bhikkhu vā bhikkhuniyā vā — “any monk or any nun”: the Pali’s specific address, smoothed into “whoever” in this English rendering.

The text

The discourse in full — a prose statement built around an extended ocean metaphor, followed by two dense verse stanzas. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.

The teaching

§2a“Whoever has not given up greed, hate, and delusion is said to have not crossed over the ocean with its waves and whirlpools, its saltwater crocodiles and monsters.

§2bWhoever has given up greed, hate, and delusion is said to have crossed over the ocean with its waves and whirlpools, its saltwater crocodiles and monsters. Crossed over and gone to the far shore, that brahmin stands on solid ground.” The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:

The verse

§3“Those in whom greed, hate, and ignorance have faded away, have crossed the ocean so hard to cross, with its saltwater crocodiles and monsters, its waves and dangers.

§4They’ve slipped their chains, given up death, and have no attachments. They’ve given up suffering, so there are no more future lives. They’ve disappeared and cannot be defined; they’ve confounded the King of Death, I say.”

§5This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What central image does this discourse use for greed, hate, and delusion left ungiven-up?
Correct: B. This extended ocean metaphor is the discourse’s most distinctive feature.
Question 2 of 10
According to the reading guide, what detail does the underlying Pali text specify that this English translation renders more generally as “whoever”?
Correct: D. This detail comes directly from the root Pali text, naming both monastic orders specifically.
Question 3 of 10
What happens, per the prose, to whoever has given up greed, hate, and delusion?
Correct: C. This completes the ocean-crossing metaphor at the heart of the discourse.
Question 4 of 10
What term, used here as an epithet rather than a birth-caste, describes the one who has crossed over?
Correct: A. Like several other early discourses, this one redefines “brahmin” by conduct and attainment rather than birth.
Question 5 of 10
What does the verse say follows from having “given up suffering” entirely?
Correct: B. This phrase (apunabbhavāya) directly follows the line about giving up suffering.
Question 6 of 10
What does the verse’s final line say has been “confounded”?
Correct: D. The person described “cannot be defined” and has confounded Death itself.
Question 7 of 10
How does this discourse’s verse compare in length to most others in this chapter?
Correct: C. This is one of the most elaborate discourses covered in this set, closing the chapter on its most imagistic note.
Question 8 of 10
What three roots does this discourse share with the previous one, Iti 68?
Correct: B. Iti 68 and Iti 69 form a matched pair on the same three unwholesome roots.
Question 9 of 10
Which chapter of the Itivuttaka’s Book of the Threes does this discourse close?
Correct: A. Iti 69 is the tenth and final discourse of Chapter Two; Iti 70 opens Chapter Three.
Question 10 of 10
What is the opening formula shared by every discourse in the Itivuttaka, including this one?
Correct: C. This formula, and a near-mirror at the close, frame every discourse in the collection.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0