Itivuttaka · The Book of the Threes · Iti 86

Practicing In Line With the Teaching

“This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.”

Setting
None given — no place, audience, or occasion is named
Form
A single, tightly worded prose definition, followed by a two-stanza verse
Length
under 1 minute to read
Book
The Book of the Threes (Iti 60–99), Chapter Four
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — extremely short, but the prose sentence's logic (three clauses, one of them a rejection of the other two) takes careful unpacking

Why this discourse, eighty-sixth

This may be the single most compressed discourse in the entire Book of the Threes — one sentence of definition, immediately restated in verse. But its subject is a term (dhammānudhammapaṭipatti, "practicing in line with the teaching") that recurs constantly throughout the canon as a mark of a genuine practitioner, almost always without being defined. Here, unusually, it is.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

To practice in line with the teaching is to speak on the teaching rather than against it, to think on the teaching rather than against it, and — rejecting both of those framings as still incomplete — to meditate with equanimity, mindfulness, and awareness.

A definition, not just an exhortation

The phrase “practicing in line with the teaching” appears constantly across the Sutta Piṭaka as a stock compliment for a serious practitioner, but is rarely spelled out. This discourse is unusual in offering an actual definition, and it does so with a careful three-part structure: “When speaking, they speak on the teaching, not against it. When thinking, they think on the teaching, not against it.” The first two clauses are mirror images of each other — right speech and right thought, defined in the same terms, both oriented positively toward the teaching rather than away from or opposed to it.

The third move: rejecting both

The sentence doesn't stop at two well-behaved clauses. It adds: “And rejecting both, they meditate staying equanimous, mindful and aware.” This third clause is the discourse's real hinge. Having speech and thought aligned with the teaching is necessary but, on its own, still leaves a kind of engagement — even favorable engagement is still engagement, still a stance being maintained about something. The final move sets aside both the speaking and the thinking — not by contradicting them, but by settling into a meditative equanimity that doesn't need to keep affirming or refuting anything at all. Practicing in line with the teaching, on this account, isn't finished by getting one's speech and thoughts correctly aligned; it completes in a stillness that has moved past needing to take a position, for or against, in the first place.

The verse: delight without falling away

The verse restates the same point through a cluster of nearly synonymous verbs — “delighting in the teaching, enjoying the teaching, contemplating the teaching” — applied to a mendicant “who recollects the teaching” and, as a result, “doesn’t fall away from the true teaching.” The repetition here isn't padding; it emphasizes that this orientation toward the teaching is meant to be constant and many-sided — felt, thought, and recalled together — rather than a single act performed once.

Every posture, the same peace

The closing lines extend the practice across the full range of ordinary activity: “whether walking or standing, sitting or lying down, with mind collected inside, they attain only peace.” These four postures — walking, standing, sitting, lying down — are the canon's standard shorthand for the entirety of a day's activity, not a special meditative posture set apart from ordinary life. The claim being made is that practicing in line with the teaching, once genuinely established, isn't confined to formal sitting practice; it travels with the practitioner through whatever they happen to be doing, because what has actually changed is the collectedness of the mind itself, not the external activity.

Key terms

practicing in line with the teaching (dhammānudhammapaṭipatti) — the discourse's subject: a term used constantly elsewhere in the canon as praise for a genuine practitioner, defined explicitly here.
speaking on the teaching, not against it — the first of the definition's three clauses.
thinking on the teaching, not against it — the second clause, mirroring the first.
rejecting both — the definition's third and decisive move: setting aside even favorable speech and thought in favor of equanimous, mindful, aware meditation.
the four postures — walking, standing, sitting, and lying down; the canon's standard shorthand for all of a day's ordinary activity, named in the closing verse as where "only peace" is attained.

The text

The discourse in full: the single-sentence definition and the two-stanza verse that restates it. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.

§2“Regarding a mendicant practicing in line with the teaching, it is in line with the teaching to declare that this is what it means to practice in line with the teaching. When speaking, they speak on the teaching, not against it. When thinking, they think on the teaching, not against it. And rejecting both, they meditate staying equanimous, mindful and aware.”

The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:

§3“Delighting in the teaching, enjoying the teaching,
contemplating the teaching,
a mendicant who recollects the teaching
doesn’t fall away from the true teaching.

§4Whether walking or standing,
sitting or lying down,
with mind collected inside,
they attain only peace.”

§5This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is the subject this discourse defines?
Correct: B. A term used constantly elsewhere in the canon but rarely spelled out this explicitly.
Question 2 of 10
What is the first clause of the discourse's definition?
Correct: C. The first of three parallel clauses in the definition.
Question 3 of 10
What is the second clause?
Correct: A. Mirroring the first clause, but for thought rather than speech.
Question 4 of 10
What is the definition's third and final move?
Correct: D. The definition's hinge: moving past even favorable speech and thought into settled equanimity.
Question 5 of 10
According to the reading guide, why does the definition move past "speaking and thinking on the teaching" to "rejecting both"?
Correct: B. The third clause is the discourse's real hinge, moving past engagement into settled stillness.
Question 6 of 10
What verbs does the verse use to describe the mendicant's relationship to the teaching?
Correct: C. A cluster of near-synonyms emphasizing a constant, many-sided orientation.
Question 7 of 10
What four postures does the closing verse name?
Correct: A. The canon's standard shorthand for the entirety of a day's ordinary activity.
Question 8 of 10
What does the reading guide say these four postures signify?
Correct: D. What changes is the collectedness of the mind, not the external activity.
Question 9 of 10
What narrative frame does this discourse provide?
Correct: B. Typical of the Itivuttaka's spare framing.
Question 10 of 10
How would you characterize the length and density of this particular discourse compared to others in the Book of the Threes?
Correct: C. One of the shortest, most tightly worded entries in the Book of the Threes.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0