Itivuttaka · Iti 99

The Three Knowledges

The Book of the Threes · Chapter Five — the last discourse of this book

Book
The Book of the Threes · Chapter Five — its last discourse (Iti 91–99 make up this book)
Frame
None — addressed generally to “mendicants,” with no location, listener, or story given
Form
An extended prose account of three knowledges, followed by one restating verse
Length
~2 minutes to read — the longest text in this batch
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — longer and more technical, though self-contained

Why this discourse, ninety-ninth

A true “brahmin” — in this discourse’s deliberately redefined sense — is simply someone who has personally mastered three knowledges: recollecting many past lives in full detail, seeing with clairvoyance how beings pass on according to their own deeds, and directly realizing the ending of defilements. Not, the discourse insists, someone who merely repeats what tradition has handed down.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A true “brahmin” — in this discourse’s specifically redefined, non-hereditary sense — is simply someone who has personally mastered three knowledges: recollecting many past lives in detail, seeing with clairvoyance how beings pass on according to their deeds, and directly realizing the ending of defilements; not someone who merely recites what tradition has handed down.

The last discourse of its book

It’s worth noting plainly: this discourse closes The Book of the Threes. Iti 91 through Iti 99 belong to this book, and Iti 99 is its final entry. Its content — a full, personal account of the three knowledges attained on the night of complete awakening — makes a fitting capstone: the fullest and most detailed account of realization anywhere across this nine-discourse stretch, right before the collection turns to a new book (The Book of the Fours) with Iti 100.

Redefining “brahmin”

The discourse opens with a direct challenge to the ordinary sense of the word: “I define a brahmin in terms of the teaching as one who is master of the three knowledges, not the other who merely repeats what they are told.” The claim to the title rests entirely on personal realization, not birth, lineage, or memorized recitation — a polemic echoed elsewhere in the tradition, including a chapter of the Dhammapada devoted to redefining “brahmin” the same way, by conduct rather than by birth.

The first knowledge: remembering past lives

The discourse describes this knowledge at unusual length for this collection: a mendicant “recollects many kinds of past lives” — “one, two, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand rebirths,” across “many eons of the world contracting… expanding… contracting and expanding” — remembering in each case a name, a clan, an appearance, a diet, felt pleasure and pain, and how that life ended, before being “reborn somewhere else.” “Ignorance was banished and knowledge arose; darkness was banished and light arose,” the discourse says of this achievement, “as happens for a meditator who is diligent, keen, and resolute.”

The second knowledge: seeing how beings fare by their deeds

“With clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman,” a mendicant “sees sentient beings passing away and being reborn — inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, in a good place or a bad place” and understands the connection to conduct: those who “did bad things by way of body, speech, and mind” and held wrong view are “reborn in a place of loss… hell,” while those who “did good things” and held right view are “reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.” The same refrain about ignorance banished and knowledge arisen closes this section too.

The third knowledge: the ending of defilements

The third knowledge is described in the same compact formula used elsewhere in this collection for full awakening: a mendicant “realizes the undefiled freedom of heart and freedom by wisdom in this very life,” living “having realized it with their own insight due to the ending of defilements.” Readers of this same batch will recognize this as nearly identical to the language Iti 97 uses for “good wisdom” — the same formula, doing the same work, in a different discourse.

Where the fuller story is told

This same three-knowledge structure — recollection of past lives, clairvoyant knowledge of beings’ rebirth according to deeds, and the ending of defilements — is also how longer biographical discourses elsewhere describe the Buddha’s own attainment on the night of his awakening. Readers wanting the fuller narrative context this compressed, three-times-repeated formula is drawn from can find it there.

Key terms

tevijja, “master of the three knowledges” — the discourse’s redefinition of “brahmin,” based on personal realization rather than birth or recitation.
pubbenivāsānussati — recollection of past lives, described here with rich detail (name, clan, appearance, food, feelings, lifespan) repeated across each remembered life.
the divine eye (clairvoyance) — clairvoyant knowledge of how beings pass away and are reborn according to their deeds, called here simply “clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman.”
the ending of defilements (āsavakkhaya) — the third knowledge, realized through “freedom of heart and freedom by wisdom” — the same formula used in Iti 97’s “good wisdom.”
“not the other who merely repeats what they are told” — the discourse’s pointed contrast with brahmins whose authority rests on memorized recitation rather than personal realization.

The text

The discourse in full — the longest text in this batch, given complete since each of the three knowledges is essential to the argument. No location or listener is named in the source. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1.1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.

§2.1“Mendicants, I define a brahmin in terms of the teaching as one who is master of the three knowledges, not the other who merely repeats what they are told.

§3.1–3.3How so? It’s when a mendicant recollects many kinds of past lives. That is: one, two, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand rebirths; many eons of the world contracting, many eons of the world expanding, many eons of the world contracting and expanding. They remember: ‘There, I was named this, my clan was that, I looked like this, and that was my food. This was how I felt pleasure and pain, and that was how my life ended. When I passed away from that place I was reborn somewhere else. There, too, I was named this, my clan was that, I looked like this, and that was my food. This was how I felt pleasure and pain, and that was how my life ended. When I passed away from that place I was reborn here.’ And so they recollect their many kinds of past lives, with features and details. This is the first knowledge they achieved. Ignorance was banished and knowledge arose; darkness was banished and light arose, as happens for a meditator who is diligent, keen, and resolute.

§4.1–4.2Furthermore, with clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman, a mendicant sees sentient beings passing away and being reborn—inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, in a good place or a bad place. They understand how sentient beings pass on according to their deeds: ‘These dear beings did bad things by way of body, speech, and mind. They denounced the noble ones; they had wrong view; and they chose to act out of that wrong view. When their body broke up, after death, they were reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. These dear beings, however, did good things by way of body, speech, and mind. They never denounced the noble ones; they had right view; and they chose to act out of that right view. When their body broke up, after death, they were reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.’ And so, with clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman, they see sentient beings passing away and being reborn—inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, in a good place or a bad place. They understand how sentient beings are reborn according to their deeds. This is the second knowledge they achieved. Ignorance was banished and knowledge arose; darkness was banished and light arose, as happens for a meditator who is diligent, keen, and resolute.

§5.1–5.3Furthermore, a mendicant realizes the undefiled freedom of heart and freedom by wisdom in this very life, and they live having realized it with their own insight due to the ending of defilements. This is the third knowledge which they achieved. Ignorance was banished and knowledge arose; darkness was banished and light arose, as happens for a meditator who is diligent, keen, and resolute. That’s how I define a brahmin in terms of the teaching as one who is master of the three knowledges, not the other who merely repeats what they are told.”

§5.4–5.5The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:

§6.1–6.4“One who knows their past lives,
sees heaven and places of loss,
and has attained the end of rebirth,
is a sage of perfect insight.

§7.1–7.4Because of these three knowledges
a brahmin is a master of the three knowledges.
That’s who I call a three-knowledge master,
and not the other who repeats what they are told.”

§8.1This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this discourse redefine the word “brahmin”?
Correct: B. The discourse opens with this exact redefinition.
Question 2 of 10
What is the first of the three knowledges?
Correct: B. “It's when a mendicant recollects many kinds of past lives.”
Question 3 of 10
In recollecting a past life, what specific details does the discourse say are remembered?
Correct: B. Each remembered life includes all of these specific details.
Question 4 of 10
What is the second knowledge?
Correct: B. This is described as “clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman.”
Question 5 of 10
According to the second knowledge, why are some beings reborn “in a place of loss... hell”?
Correct: B. This is the causal explanation the discourse gives, tied to conduct and view.
Question 6 of 10
What is the third knowledge?
Correct: B. This is the discourse's description of the third and final knowledge.
Question 7 of 10
According to the reading guide, which book of the Itivuttaka does this discourse close?
Correct: C. Iti 91 through Iti 99 make up The Book of the Threes, and Iti 99 is its last discourse.
Question 8 of 10
According to the reading guide, where else (outside the Itivuttaka) does a fuller account of the Buddha attaining these same three knowledges appear?
Correct: B. Longer biographical discourses elsewhere describe this same three-knowledge structure at the Buddha's own awakening.
Question 9 of 10
According to the reading guide, what other well-known chapter also redefines “brahmin” by conduct rather than birth?
Correct: B. The Dhammapada contains a chapter making the same argument by conduct rather than birth.
Question 10 of 10
Does this discourse specify a location, listener, or story?
Correct: C. No setting is given.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0