Reading guide
A close companion, not a duplicate
This discourse follows SN 12.17's structure closely enough that reading them side by side is more useful than reading either alone; the value here lies in noticing precisely where the two diverge, not in treating this as unrelated new content.
Pleasure and pain, not suffering, as the topic
Timbaruka's fourfold question concerns sukhadukkha — pleasure and pain together — a broader framing than Kassapa's question about suffering alone, encompassing pleasant experience as much as painful.
The same diagnosis, phrased around feeling rather than deeds
Where SN 12.17 diagnosed the self-made position as assuming one continuous self doing a deed and experiencing its result, this discourse diagnoses it in terms of the feeling itself and the one who feels it — a smaller shift in vocabulary carrying the same underlying logic.
An identical middle way, reached by a parallel route
Despite these differences in framing, the conclusion is exactly the same: avoiding both extremes, the Realized One teaches dependent origination, word for word matching SN 12.17's own formula.
A different outcome, worth noticing without overreading it
Where Kassapa requested ordination and underwent a probationary period before becoming a monk, Timbaruka asks only to be remembered as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life — a genuinely different resolution, though the text gives no explanation for why one wanderer sought ordination and the other did not.
Key terms
The text
§1Then the wanderer Timbaruka went up to the Buddha, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to the Buddha:
§2“Well, worthy Gotama, are pleasure and pain made by oneself?” “Not so, Timbaruka,” said the Buddha. “Then are pleasure and pain made by another?” “Not so, Timbaruka,” said the Buddha. “Well, are pleasure and pain made by both oneself and another?” “Not so, Timbaruka,” said the Buddha. “Then do pleasure and pain arise anomalously, not made by oneself or another?” “Not so, Timbaruka,” said the Buddha. “Well, is there no such thing as pleasure and pain?” “It’s not that there’s no such thing as pleasure and pain. Pleasure and pain are real.” “Then does the worthy Gotama not know or see suffering?” “It’s not that I don’t know or see pleasure and pain. I do know pleasure and pain, I do see pleasure and pain.”
§3Sir, explain pleasure and pain to me! Teach me about pleasure and pain!”
§4“Suppose that the feeling and the one who feels it are one and the same. Then for one who has existed since the beginning, pleasure and pain is made by oneself. I don’t say this. Suppose that the feeling is one thing and the one who feels it is another. Then for one stricken by feeling, pleasure and pain is made by another. I don’t say this. Avoiding these two extremes, the Realized One teaches by the middle way: ‘Ignorance is a requirement for choices. Choices are a requirement for consciousness. … That is how this entire mass of suffering originates. When ignorance fades away and ceases with no residue left behind, choices cease. When choices cease, consciousness ceases. … That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.’”
§5When he said this, the wanderer Timbaruka said to the Buddha, “Excellent, worthy Gotama! Excellent! … I go for refuge to the worthy Gotama, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the worthy Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.