Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 12.32

With Kaḷāra the Aristocrat

Kaḷārasutta

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
Kaḷāra the Aristocrat, Sāriputta, the Buddha, and a group of mendicants
Form
A narrated episode in three movements — a quiet exchange, a rigorous interrogation, and a closing boast confirmed as genuine
Length
~7 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — one of this saṃyutta's most vivid, characterful discourses

Why this discourse

This discourse opens with news that could easily read as discouraging: Phagguna, the monk who once questioned the Buddha about who consumes consciousness as fuel back in SN 12.12, has disrobed and returned to lay life. Sāriputta's response is cool and understated, and when pressed about his own progress, he answers just as indirectly — no formal declaration, just two spare phrases: no uncertainty, no doubt. What follows is the Buddha testing that understatement rigorously, question by question, until Sāriputta closes with a genuinely confident claim: he could answer the same questions, in ever-different words, for seven full days and nights.

Reading guide

A departure setting up a very different outcome

News of Phagguna's disrobing isn't simply background; it frames everything that follows by contrast, one monk's quiet departure from the training set directly against another's quiet but unmistakable attainment within it.

A declaration made without declaring

When Kaḷāra asks Sāriputta directly whether he has found solace in the teaching, Sāriputta doesn't use anything resembling the standard formula for announcing enlightenment; his answer is just two spare phrases, no uncertainty and no doubt.

A report that outpaces what was actually said

Kaḷāra rushes to tell the Buddha that Sāriputta has formally declared enlightenment in the standard words, when Sāriputta never actually used that formula at all — a small but meaningful gap between what was said and how it was reported.

An interrogation that tests substance, not phrasing

Rather than correcting Kaḷāra's misreport, the Buddha questions Sāriputta directly and rigorously, tracing back through the chain link by link and asking exactly how he knows what he claims to know — testing whether the understanding is genuine, regardless of what words were or weren't used to express it.

A boast made in private, then confirmed in public

Sāriputta's remarkable claim — that he could answer the same question in different words for seven days and nights straight — is made privately to the other monks after the Buddha has already left, and only becomes public when Kaḷāra reports it back; the Buddha's confirmation that this is no exaggeration closes the discourse.

Key terms

sikkhaṁ paccakkhāya hīnāyāvatto — “resigned the training and returned to a lesser life” — the news of Phagguna's disrobing, opening the discourse by contrast.
na khvāhaṁ kaṅkhāmi… na vicikicchāmi — “I have no uncertainty… I have no doubt” — Sāriputta's understated, indirect response when asked about his own attainment.
na kho, bhante, etehi padehi etehi byañjanehi attho vutto — “I did not state the matter in these words and phrases” — Sāriputta's insistence that Kaḷāra's report used language he himself never actually spoke.
yaṁ kiñci vedayitaṁ taṁ dukkhasmiṁ — “suffering includes whatever is felt” — the Buddha's compact restatement of Sāriputta's reasoning on the impermanence of feeling.
divasañcepi maṁ bhagavā… satta rattindivānipāhaṁ byākareyyaṁ — “even for seven days and nights I could answer in different words and ways” — Sāriputta's confident private boast, confirmed by the Buddha as his genuine “lion's roar.”

The text

The discourse in full, one of this saṃyutta's most vivid and characterful. Several passages repeating earlier content are elided in the source exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1Then the mendicant Kaḷāra the Aristocrat went up to Venerable Sāriputta and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to him, “Reverend Sāriputta, the mendicant Phagguna of the Top-Knot has resigned the training and returned to a lesser life.” “That venerable mustn’t have gained any solace in this teaching and training.”

§2“Well then, has Venerable Sāriputta found found in this teaching and training?” “Reverend, I have no uncertainty.” “But what of the future?” “I have no doubt.”

§3Then Kaḷāra the Aristocrat went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him, “Sir, Venerable Sāriputta has declared enlightenment: ‘I understand: “Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.”’”

§4So the Buddha addressed one of the monks, “Please, monk, in my name tell Sāriputta that the teacher summons him.” “Yes, sir,” that monk replied. He went to Sāriputta and said to him, “Reverend Sāriputta, the teacher summons you.” “Yes, reverend,” replied Sāriputta. He went to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him, “Sāriputta, is it really true that you have declared enlightenment: ‘I understand: “Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place”’?” “Sir, I did not state the matter in these words and phrases.” “Sāriputta, no matter how a gentleman declares enlightenment, what he has declared should be regarded as such.” “Sir, did I not also say that I did not state the matter in these words and phrases?”

§5“Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘But Reverend Sāriputta, how have you known and seen so that you’ve declared enlightenment: “I understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”’ How would you answer?” “Sir, if they were to ask me this, I would answer: ‘Reverends, when the source of rebirth ended, I knew “it is ended”. Knowing it is ended, I understand: “Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.”’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.”

§6“But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘But what is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of rebirth?’ How would you answer?” “Sir, if they were to ask me this, I would answer: ‘Continued existence is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of rebirth.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.” “But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘What is the source of continued existence?’ How would you answer?” “Sir, if they were to ask me this, I’d answer: ‘Grasping is the source of continued existence.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.” “But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘What is the source of grasping?’ … But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘What is the source of craving?’ How would you answer?” “Sir, if they were to ask me this, I’d answer: ‘Feeling is the source of craving.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.”

§7“But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘But how have you known and seen so that the relishing of feelings is no longer present?’ How would you answer?” “Sir, if they were to ask me this, I’d answer: ‘Reverends, there are three feelings. What three? Pleasant, painful, and neutral feeling. These three feelings are impermanent, and what’s impermanent is suffering. When I understood this, the relishing of feelings was no longer present.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.” “Good, good, Sāriputta! The same point may also be briefly explained in this way: ‘Suffering includes whatever is felt.’

§8But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you: ‘But Reverend, how have you been liberated that you declare enlightenment: “I understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”?’ How would you answer?” “Sir, if they were to ask me this, I’d answer: ‘Because of an inner release with the ending of all grasping, I live mindfully so that defilements don’t defile me and I don’t look down on myself.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.” “Good, good, Sāriputta! The same point may also be briefly explained in this way: ‘I have no uncertainty regarding the defilements spoken of by the ascetic. I have no doubt that I’ve given them up.’” That is what the Buddha said. When he had spoken, the Holy One got up from his seat and entered his dwelling.

§9Then soon after the Buddha left, Venerable Sāriputta said to the mendicants, “Reverends, the Buddha asked me the first question without letting me know beforehand, so I hesitated. But when the Buddha agreed with my answer, I thought: ‘If the Buddha were to question me all day on this matter in different words and ways, I could answer all day with different words and ways. If he were to question me all night, all day and night, for two days and nights, for three, four, five, six, or seven days and nights, I could answer in different words and ways for seven days and nights.’”

§10Then Kaḷāra the Aristocrat went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him, “Sir, Venerable Sāriputta has roared his lion’s roar!” (And he told the Buddha all that Sāriputta had said.)

§11“Mendicant, Sāriputta has clearly penetrated the principle of the teachings, so that he could answer any questions I might ask him in different words and ways up to the seventh day and night.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What news opens this discourse?
Correct: A. Setting up a deliberate contrast with what follows.
Question 2 of 10
How does Sāriputta answer when Kaḷāra asks about his own progress?
Correct: A. An understated declaration, not the standard formula.
Question 3 of 10
What does Kaḷāra report to the Buddha about Sāriputta?
Correct: A. A gap between what was actually said and how it was reported.
Question 4 of 10
How does Sāriputta respond when the Buddha asks him to confirm the declaration?
Correct: A. Insisting on the gap between the report and his own actual words.
Question 5 of 10
How does the Buddha respond to this insistence on precise wording?
Correct: A. Substance over exact phrasing, while still proceeding to test the substance itself.
Question 6 of 10
What method does the Buddha use to test Sāriputta's understanding?
Correct: A. Rigorous questioning of substance, not just acceptance of a claim.
Question 7 of 10
What compact restatement does the Buddha offer for Sāriputta's reasoning about feeling?
Correct: A. A briefer version of the same point about feeling's impermanence.
Question 8 of 10
What confident claim does Sāriputta make privately to the other monks?
Correct: A. A remarkable claim of total command over the teaching's underlying principle.
Question 9 of 10
How does the Buddha respond when Kaḷāra reports Sāriputta's boast?
Correct: A. Full confirmation, calling it a genuine "lion's roar" rather than a boast.
Question 10 of 10
Where does this exchange take place?
Correct: A. The consistent setting for this chapter of Nidānavagga.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0