Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 12.39

Intention (2nd)

Dutiyacetanāsutta

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the assembled mendicants
Form
The same three-case structure as SN 12.38, but with consciousness's establishment connected explicitly to the full downstream chain rather than compressed into a single step
Length
~4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the same density as SN 12.38, extended across more links

Why this discourse

This discourse repeats SN 12.38's three-case structure — intending and planning present, only underlying tendency present, none of the three present — but fills in what the previous discourse compressed. Where SN 12.38 moved directly from consciousness's establishment to regeneration into a new existence, this discourse spells out the specific mechanism: once consciousness is established, name and form are conceived, and from there the familiar chain runs forward exactly as in SN 12.1 — the six sense fields, contact, feeling, craving, grasping, continued existence, rebirth, and old age and death. Reading the two discourses together shows a single teaching given at two different resolutions, one naming the outcome directly and the other naming the specific links that produce it.

Reading guide

The same three cases, the same conclusion

Exactly as in SN 12.38, intending and planning present leads to suffering's arising, underlying tendency alone is equally sufficient, and only the complete absence of all three breaks the chain — nothing about the three-case logic itself has changed.

Name and form's descent named explicitly

Where SN 12.38 skipped straight to regeneration, this discourse names the specific step in between: once consciousness is established and grows, name and form are conceived, connecting intention's role directly to the language used elsewhere for a being's descent into a new existence.

The familiar chain resumed from its usual point

From name and form onward, the discourse runs through exactly the links familiar from SN 12.1 and SN 12.2 — the six sense fields, contact, feeling, craving, grasping, continued existence, rebirth, old age and death — elided here just as it is elsewhere, trusting the reader's familiarity.

Two discourses at two resolutions

SN 12.38 and this discourse aren't presenting different teachings; they're the same account of how intention sustains rebirth, one compressed to name only the outcome, the other expanded to show the specific chain of links that produces it.

The same reversal governs cessation here too

Exactly as in SN 12.38, it's the complete absence of intending, planning, and underlying tendency together — not merely two of the three — that removes consciousness's support and brings the entire downstream chain, now spelled out in full, to cessation.

Key terms

ceteti… pakappeti… anuseti — “intends… plans… has underlying tendencies for” — the same three volitional ingredients examined in SN 12.38.
ārammaṇametaṁ hoti viññāṇassa ṭhitiyā — “this becomes a support for the continuation of consciousness” — the identical mechanical image carried over from SN 12.38.
nāmarūpassa avakkanti — “name and form are conceived” — literally name and form's descent, the specific step this discourse names where SN 12.38 skipped straight to regeneration.
nāmarūpapaccayā saḷāyatanaṁ — “name and form are requirements for the six sense fields” — the point where the familiar twelve-link chain resumes and is elided onward as usual.
nāmarūpanirodhā saḷāyatananirodho — “when name and form cease, the six sense fields cease” — the reverse direction, given once all three volitional ingredients are entirely absent.

The text

The discourse in full. The chain from name and form onward is elided in the source exactly as bilara-data preserves it, trusting the reader's familiarity with SN 12.1–2. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī.

§2“Mendicants, what you intend or plan, and what you have underlying tendencies for become a support for the continuation of consciousness. When this support exists, consciousness becomes established. When consciousness is established, name and form are conceived. Name and form are requirements for the six sense fields. The six sense fields are requirements for contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling. … craving … grasping … continued existence … rebirth … old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress come to be. That is how this entire mass of suffering originates.

§3If you don’t intend or plan, but still have underlying tendencies, this becomes a support for the continuation of consciousness. When this support exists, consciousness becomes established. When consciousness is established, name and form are conceived. Name and form are requirements for the six sense fields. … That is how this entire mass of suffering originates.

§4If you don’t intend or plan or have underlying tendencies, this doesn’t become a support for the continuation of consciousness. With no support, consciousness is not established. When consciousness is not established and doesn’t grow, name and form are not conceived. When name and form cease, the six sense fields cease. … That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What structure does this discourse share with SN 12.38?
Correct: A. The identical three-case logic governing suffering's arising and cessation.
Question 2 of 10
What specific step does this discourse name that SN 12.38 skipped over?
Correct: A. The link SN 12.38 compressed by moving straight to regeneration.
Question 3 of 10
From name and form onward, which links does this discourse run through?
Correct: A. The chain familiar from SN 12.1 and SN 12.2, elided here as elsewhere.
Question 4 of 10
What must be absent for the entire chain, now spelled out in full, to cease?
Correct: A. The same complete-absence requirement as SN 12.38's third case.
Question 5 of 10
How do SN 12.38 and this discourse relate to each other?
Correct: A. One names the outcome directly, the other spells out the specific links producing it.
Question 6 of 10
What does "nāmarūpassa avakkanti" literally mean?
Correct: A. Language elsewhere associated with a being's entry into a new existence.
Question 7 of 10
Is the underlying-tendency-alone case in this discourse sufficient to sustain the chain?
Correct: A. The same conclusion as SN 12.38's second case, now run through the full chain.
Question 8 of 10
How is the middle of the chain treated in this discourse's source text?
Correct: A. Preserved exactly as bilara-data elides it.
Question 9 of 10
Who is the sole speaker in this discourse?
Correct: A. No interlocutor or visiting figure appears.
Question 10 of 10
Where does the Buddha deliver this teaching?
Correct: A. The consistent setting across this chapter of Nidānavagga.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0