Ru-Yi Meditation Center
Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 12.53

Fetters

Saṁyojanasutta

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the assembled mendicants
Form
The same two matched pairs as SN 12.52, with an oil lamp in place of a fire and a shift from "grasping" to "fetters" in the framing
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — the same content as SN 12.52, in a different image

Why this discourse

This discourse repeats SN 12.52's structure exactly — attention on gratification growing craving, attention on drawbacks ending it, each half paired with a fire-family simile — but changes two things at once. The framing shifts from "things that fuel grasping" (upādāniyesu dhammesu) to "things that tighten the fetters" (saṁyojaniyesu dhammesu), and the simile shifts from a great mass of fire to a small oil lamp, kept burning by someone pouring in oil and adjusting the wick from time to time, or left to go out once its fuel is used up and nothing more is added. The change in scale, from a great blaze to a single household lamp, doesn't change the underlying mechanism at all.

Reading guide

Two changes at once, one structure unchanged

Both the vocabulary naming what's at stake (fetters rather than grasping) and the simile's image (a lamp rather than a fire) change together, while the underlying two-part, attention-driven structure carries over from SN 12.52 without modification.

Fetters as a different lens on the same danger

"Saṁyojana" names the same underlying things named "upādāniya" in SN 12.52, but foregrounds their binding, restraining function rather than their role as fuel for grasping — two names for the same hazard, each emphasizing a different aspect of it.

A smaller, more domestic image than SN 12.52's blaze

Where SN 12.52's fire was scaled up to ten or forty loads of wood, this discourse's oil lamp is a modest, everyday object, tended by pouring in oil and adjusting the wick — a smaller image making the same point about ordinary, unremarkable maintenance sustaining craving.

The same maintenance, the same neglect

Just as SN 12.52's fire needed only periodic feeding to keep burning, this discourse's lamp needs only occasional attention — pouring oil, adjusting the wick — and its extinguishing likewise requires nothing more dramatic than simply withholding that attention.

A pairing that confirms the mechanism, not just the image

Because the underlying structure is identical to SN 12.52's, reading the two discourses together confirms that the mechanism being taught doesn't depend on any particular image — fire or lamp, grasping or fetters — but on attention itself.

Key terms

saṁyojaniyesu… dhammesu assādānupassino viharato taṇhā pavaḍḍhati — “there are things that tighten the fetters. When you concentrate on the gratification provided by these things, your craving grows” — the same structure as SN 12.52, with fetters in place of grasping.
telañca paṭicca vaṭṭiñca paṭicca telappadīpo jhāyeyya — “an oil lamp depended on oil and a wick to burn” — the simile's image, in place of SN 12.52's great mass of fire.
kālena kālaṁ telaṁ āsiñceyya vaṭṭiṁ upasaṁhareyya — “from time to time someone would pour oil in and adjust the wick” — the small, periodic maintenance sustaining the lamp.
purimassa ca upādānassa pariyādānā aññassa ca anupahārā anāhāro nibbāyeyya — “as the original fuel is used up and no more is added, the oil lamp would be extinguished due to not being fed” — the same extinguishing formula as SN 12.52, applied to the lamp.
assādānupassino… ādīnavānupassino — “concentrating on gratification… concentrating on drawbacks” — the recurring contrast underlying every discourse in this chapter.

The text

The discourse in full. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “There are things that tighten the fetters. When you concentrate on the gratification provided by these things, your craving grows. Craving is a requirement for grasping. Grasping is a requirement for continued existence. Continued existence is a requirement for rebirth. Rebirth is a requirement for old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress to come to be. That is how this entire mass of suffering originates.

§2Suppose an oil lamp depended on oil and a wick to burn. And from time to time someone would pour oil in and adjust the wick. Fed and fuelled by that, the oil lamp would burn for a long time. In the same way, there are things that tighten the fetters. When you concentrate on the gratification provided by these things, your craving grows. Craving is a requirement for grasping. Grasping is a requirement for continued existence. Continued existence is a requirement for rebirth. Rebirth is a requirement for old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress to come to be. That is how this entire mass of suffering originates.

§3There are things that tighten the fetters. When you concentrate on the drawbacks of these things, your craving ceases. When craving ceases, grasping ceases. When grasping ceases, continued existence ceases. When continued existence ceases, rebirth ceases. When rebirth ceases, old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress cease. That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.

§4Suppose an oil lamp depended on oil and a wick to burn. And no-one would pour oil in and adjust the wick from time to time. As the original fuel is used up and no more is added, the oil lamp would be extinguished due to not being fed. In the same way, there are things that tighten the fetters. When you concentrate on the drawbacks of these things, your craving ceases. When craving ceases, grasping ceases. … That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this discourse's structure compare to SN 12.52's?
Correct: A. The same underlying mechanism, restated through new terms and image.
Question 2 of 10
What term does this discourse use in place of SN 12.52's "things that fuel grasping"?
Correct: A. A different name foregrounding the binding, restraining function of the same hazard.
Question 3 of 10
What simile replaces SN 12.52's great mass of fire?
Correct: A. A smaller, more domestic image making the same point.
Question 4 of 10
How is the oil lamp kept burning, according to this discourse?
Correct: A. Small, periodic maintenance, echoing SN 12.52's periodic feeding of the fire.
Question 5 of 10
How does the lamp go out, in the cessation half of this discourse?
Correct: A. The same extinguishing-through-absence formula as SN 12.52.
Question 6 of 10
What does reading this discourse together with SN 12.52 confirm?
Correct: A. The mechanism being taught is attention itself, not the specific image used.
Question 7 of 10
What determines whether craving grows or ceases in this discourse, as in SN 12.52?
Correct: A. The same lever as SN 12.52, unchanged by the shift in vocabulary and image.
Question 8 of 10
What happens to the chain of conditions once craving ceases in this discourse?
Correct: A. The same reverse chain as SN 12.52 and elsewhere in this saṃyutta.
Question 9 of 10
Who is the sole speaker in this discourse?
Correct: A. No interlocutor or visiting figure appears.
Question 10 of 10
Where does the Buddha deliver this teaching?
Correct: A. The consistent setting shared with most of this chapter's discourses.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0

Further reading

← PreviousSN 12.52 · Grasping