Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 12.68

At Kosambī

Kosambisutta

Setting
Kosambī, at Ghosita's monastery
Speakers
Venerables Saviṭṭha, Musīla, Nārada, and Ānanda
Form
A repeated formula tested first against Musīla, then against Nārada, exposing a distinction between them that the formula alone doesn't capture
Length
~6 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★★ — a careful distinction between knowing and being that easy formulas can't settle

Why this discourse

Saviṭṭha asks Musīla, link by link through the whole chain and then all the way to "the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment," whether he knows this personally — apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned argument, or accepting a view after reflection. Musīla affirms every single step with the same formula: he knows and sees it himself. Satisfied, Saviṭṭha concludes Musīla must be a fully awakened arahant — and Musīla simply falls silent. Nārada then volunteers to answer the identical questions, gives identical answers, but when Saviṭṭha draws the same conclusion, Nārada refuses it outright: he has genuinely seen with right wisdom that the cessation of existence is extinguishment, and yet he is not an arahant. His explanation is the discourse's central image — a well on a desert road with neither rope nor bucket, its water visible to a parched traveler who knows perfectly well that it's there, but cannot physically touch it.

Reading guide

The same formula, tested on two different people

Saviṭṭha's question and its precise wording — apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned argument, or accepted view, do you personally know — is repeated identically for Musīla and then for Nārada, making the two responses directly comparable rather than two separate teachings.

A formula that measures knowledge, not necessarily attainment

Both Musīla and Nārada give exactly the same affirmative answers to exactly the same questions, right up to and including the cessation of existence being extinguishment — yet this identical knowledge doesn't settle whether either of them has fully attained what they know.

Silence as its own kind of answer

When Saviṭṭha calls Musīla an arahant, Musīla doesn't correct him or explain; he simply falls silent, leaving the reader to draw their own conclusion about what that silence means, since the text itself doesn't say.

A direct refusal, backed by a precise image

Where Musīla stays quiet, Nārada speaks up clearly: he has truly seen with right wisdom that the cessation of existence is extinguishment, and states plainly that he is not an arahant, refusing to let the formula's affirmative answers stand in for a claim he won't make.

Water seen, but not yet touched

The waterless well doesn't describe someone deceived or mistaken about where the water is; the traveler's knowledge is completely accurate — the gap is purely between knowing something is real and being able to physically reach it, a precise distinction between clear seeing and complete attainment.

Key terms

aññatreva… saddhāya aññatra ruciyā aññatra anussavā aññatra ākāraparivitakkā aññatra diṭṭhinijjhānakkhantiyā… paccattameva ñāṇaṁ — “apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation… personal knowledge” — the discourse's repeated, precisely worded question.
bhavanirodho nibbānaṁ — “the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment” — the final, most demanding step both Musīla and Nārada affirm knowing personally.
tenahāyasmā… arahaṁ khīṇāsavo — “then Venerable… is a perfected one, with defilements ended” — Saviṭṭha's conclusion, met with silence from Musīla and direct refusal from Nārada.
kantāramagge udapāno, tatra nevassa rajju na udakavārako — “a well on a desert road… with neither rope nor bucket” — Nārada's image for knowing something is real without being able to reach it.
udakan”ti hi kho ñāṇaṁ assa, na ca kāyena phusitvā vihareyya — “they'd know that there was water, but they couldn't physically touch it” — the precise distinction between clear seeing and complete attainment.

The text

The discourse in full. Section 8 elides an identical repetition of Saviṭṭha's questions to Venerable Nārada, exactly as bilara-data leaves it elided, trusting the reader's memory of the parallel exchange with Musīla just given. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the venerables Musīla, Saviṭṭha, Nārada, and Ānanda were staying near Kosambī in Ghosita’s monastery. Then Venerable Saviṭṭha said to Venerable Musīla: “Reverend Musīla, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, do you personally know that rebirth is a requirement for old age and death?” “Reverend Saviṭṭha, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, I know and see that rebirth is a requirement for old age and death.”

§2“Reverend Musīla, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberateation, do you personally know that continued existence is a requirement for rebirth … grasping is a requirement for continued existence … craving is a requirement for grasping … feeling is a requirement for craving … contact is a requirement for feeling … the six sense fields are requirements for contact … name and form are requirements for the six sense fields … consciousness is a requirement for name and form … choices are a requirement for consciousness … ignorance is a requirement for choices?” “Reverend Saviṭṭha, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, I know and see that ignorance is a requirement for choices.”

§3“Reverend Musīla, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, do you personally know that when rebirth ceases, old age and death cease?” “Reverend Saviṭṭha, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, I know and see that when rebirth ceases, old age and death cease.”

§4“Reverend Musīla, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, do you personally know that when continued existence ceases, rebirth ceases … when grasping ceases, continued existence ceases … when craving ceases, grasping ceases … when feeling ceases, craving ceases … when contact ceases, feeling ceases … when the six sense fields cease, contact ceases … when name and form cease, the six sense fields cease … when consciousness ceases name and form cease … when choices cease consciousness ceases … when ignorance ceases, choices cease?” “Reverend Saviṭṭha, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, I know and see that when ignorance ceases, choices cease.”

§5“Reverend Musīla, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, do you personally know that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment?” “Reverend Saviṭṭha, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, I know and see that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment.”

§6“Then Venerable Musīla is a perfected one, with defilements ended.” When he said this, Musīla kept silent.

§7Then Venerable Nārada said to Venerable Saviṭṭha, “Reverend Saviṭṭha, please let me answer these questions. Ask me and I will answer them for you.” “By all means, Venerable Nārada, try these questions. I’ll ask you and you can answer them for me.” (Saviṭṭha repeats exactly the same series of questions, and Nārada answers just as Musīla did.)

§8“Reverend Nārada, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, do you personally know that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment?” “Reverend Saviṭṭha, apart from faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation, I know and see that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment.”

§9“Then Venerable Nārada is a perfected one, with defilements ended.” “I have truly seen clearly with right wisdom that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment. Yet I am not a perfected one. Suppose there was a well on a desert road that had neither rope nor bucket. Then along comes a person struggling in the oppressive heat, weary, thirsty, and parched. They’d know that there was water, but they couldn’t physically touch it. In the same way, I have truly seen clearly with right wisdom that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment. Yet I am not a perfected one.”

§10When he said this, Venerable Ānanda said to Venerable Saviṭṭha, “Reverend Saviṭṭha, what do you have to say to Venerable Nārada when he speaks like this?” “Reverend Ānanda, I have nothing to say to Venerable Nārada when he speaks like this, except what is good and wholesome.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What precise question does Saviṭṭha ask Musīla about each link of the chain?
Correct: A. A precisely worded question about independent, personal knowledge, repeated at every step.
Question 2 of 10
How does Musīla answer every one of Saviṭṭha's questions?
Correct: A. A consistent, identical formula of personal affirmation at every link.
Question 3 of 10
What does Musīla do when Saviṭṭha concludes he must be an arahant?
Correct: A. The text doesn't explain what this silence means, leaving it open.
Question 4 of 10
How does Nārada's response differ from Musīla's, despite giving identical answers to the same questions?
Correct: A. A direct, spoken refusal rather than silence.
Question 5 of 10
What image does Nārada use to explain his position?
Correct: A. The discourse's central image for knowing something is real without reaching it.
Question 6 of 10
What is the traveler's relationship to the water in Nārada's well simile?
Correct: A. Accurate knowledge, but a gap between knowing and complete attainment.
Question 7 of 10
What does this discourse's structure — the same formula tested on two people — accomplish?
Correct: A. Identical knowledge, yet a real difference the formula's affirmative answers can't capture.
Question 8 of 10
What is the final, most demanding step both Musīla and Nārada affirm personally knowing?
Correct: A. The culminating link in the sequence of questions.
Question 9 of 10
How does Venerable Ānanda respond at the discourse's close?
Correct: A. A closing question drawing the exchange to its final point.
Question 10 of 10
Where does this exchange take place?
Correct: A. A distinct setting from most of this chapter's other discourses.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0