Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 18.7

Intention

Sañcetanāsutta

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
Venerable Rāhula and the Buddha
Form
The template extended to intention, the karmically active response to sense objects
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — the seventh subject, moving from recognition to karmically significant response

Why this discourse

This discourse turns to sañcetanā, intention or volition, examined here as intention regarding each of the six sense objects — intention regarding sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas. Where perception in SN 18.6 names how something is recognized, intention names the mind's active response to what's encountered, a category the wider tradition treats as directly bound up with karma.

Reading guide

A move from recognition to karmically active response

Perception in the discourse before this one identifies and labels; intention goes further, naming the mind's willed response to what has been recognized — a shift from passive registration to active, karma-generating volition.

Sañcetanā's well-known canonical weight

This term carries particular significance elsewhere in the canon, where intention itself is identified with karma; applying the impermanence analysis to intention here extends this saṃyutta's reach into territory with direct ethical consequence, not merely descriptive psychology.

The object-based naming pattern continuing

As in SN 18.2 and SN 18.6, this discourse names its six kinds after sense objects rather than sense doors, maintaining the alternating pattern this saṃyutta has used since its object-focused second discourse.

A further step into what generates future experience

If contact and feeling describe what happens to someone, and perception describes how it's recognized, intention describes what one does in response — the point where this chain of analysis touches directly on the production of future karmic consequence.

Seventh in an unbroken sequence, three discourses remaining

With three more categories still to come in this vagga — craving, elements, and the aggregates — this discourse marks the sweep's approach toward its close, having moved steadily from the most external categories to the most karmically consequential.

Key terms

rūpasañcetanā … saddasañcetanā … gandhasañcetanā … rasasañcetanā … phoṭṭhabbasañcetanā … dhammasañcetanā — “intention regarding sights … sounds … smells … tastes … touches … ideas” — the six kinds this discourse examines.
sañcetanā — “intention, volition” — a term carrying direct karmic weight elsewhere in the canon, where intention itself is identified with karma.
…pe… — the peyyāla elision mark — the same compression convention continuing from the discourses before this one.
aniccā — “impermanent” — the template's first term, applied here to each of the six kinds of intention.
sattamaṁ — “the seventh” — this discourse's closing numbering tag.

The text

The discourse as preserved in the source, elided around SN 18.1's fuller sentence structure. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “What do you think, Rāhula? Is intention regarding sights permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” … “… intention regarding sounds … intention regarding smells … intention regarding tastes … intention regarding touches … Is intention regarding ideas permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” … “Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with intention regarding sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas. …”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does this discourse examine?
Correct: A. A shift from passive recognition to active, karma-generating volition.
Question 2 of 10
How does intention differ from perception, examined in the discourse before this one?
Correct: A. A shift from passive registration to active response.
Question 3 of 10
What significance does sañcetanā carry elsewhere in the wider canon?
Correct: A. Extending this saṃyutta's reach into territory with direct ethical consequence.
Question 4 of 10
How does this discourse name its six categories?
Correct: A. Maintaining the alternating naming pattern this saṃyutta has used since SN 18.2.
Question 5 of 10
What does examining intention add to the chain traced from contact through perception?
Correct: A. What one does in response, not merely what happens or how it's recognized.
Question 6 of 10
How many categories remain after this discourse in the ten-discourse series?
Correct: A. Marking the sweep's approach toward its close.
Question 7 of 10
What analytical steps does this discourse apply to each kind of intention?
Correct: A. The same unchanged template from SN 18.1.
Question 8 of 10
What outcome does this discourse describe for one who sees this clearly?
Correct: A. The same closing sequence reused throughout this saṃyutta.
Question 9 of 10
Who are the two participants in this discourse?
Correct: A. The same father-and-son pair continuing throughout this saṃyutta.
Question 10 of 10
What numbering tag closes this discourse?
Correct: A. The seventh discourse in this series.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0