Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.117

Shackles

Bandhanasutta — Dhammakathikavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants
Form
A contrastive pair, structured on the near/far shore metaphor
Length
Medium — two parallel sections of roughly equal length
Northern parallel
The near/far shore metaphor for saṃsāra and nibbāna is widely attested across the Canon, most famously in the Dhammapada's own "far shore" imagery
Difficulty
Moderate — the shore metaphor rewards unpacking alongside the discourse's own bondage imagery

Why this discourse

Introduces a striking new image into this run of discourses: being "bound... inside and out" to each aggregate means seeing "neither the near shore nor the far shore" — born, living, and dying entirely within bonds — against the noble disciple who, unbound, sees both shores and is free.

Reading guide

Bound inside and out

An unlearned ordinary person regards each aggregate through the familiar fourfold formula (as self, self as having it, it in self, self in it) and is thereby "bound to form, inside and out" — the phrase suggesting bondage on both sides of any boundary the aggregate might seem to mark, internal and external alike.

Neither shore in sight

"They see neither the near shore nor the far shore" — a striking image implying that bondage does not merely block passage to the far shore (liberation) but obscures even the near shore (the starting point, ordinary bound existence itself) from clear view.

"They're born in bonds and die in bonds, and in bonds they go from this world to the next" — bondage as a condition spanning an entire life and extending across rebirth, not a temporary or occasional state.

Both shores, seen clearly

The learned noble disciple, by contrast, "is not bound to form, inside or out" and "sees the near shore and the far shore" — the identical image inverted, with clear sight of both banks replacing blindness to either.

"They're free from suffering, I say" closes the positive case — not merely unbound, but explicitly named free from suffering as a direct consequence.

Why this vagga's title ("Shackles") fits this discourse specifically

Bandhana, "shackles" or "bondage," names precisely what this discourse describes and its inverse dispels — a concrete, physically evocative term for what the abstract fourfold self-identification formula actually produces: not merely a mistaken view, but a binding.

Key terms

bandhana — shackles, bondage — the term giving this discourse its title
orimatīra — the near shore — the starting point, ordinary bound existence, invisible to one who is bound
pārimatīra — the far shore — liberation, likewise invisible to one who is bound
ajjhattaṁ bahiddhā — inside and out, internal and external — describing the totality of the bondage to each aggregate
saddhiṁ bandhena — "in bonds," "with the bond" — describing birth, death, and passage from this world to the next

The text

The full discourse: the unlearned person bound inside and out, and the noble disciple who sees both shores. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, take an unlearned ordinary person who has not seen the noble ones, and is neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the noble ones. They’ve not seen true persons, and are neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the true persons. They regard form as self, self as having form, form in self, or self in form. They’re called an unlearned ordinary person who is bound to form, inside and out. They see neither the near shore nor the far shore. They’re born in bonds and die in bonds, and in bonds they go from this world to the next.

§2They regard feeling … perception … choices … consciousness as self. They’re called an unlearned ordinary person who is bound to consciousness, inside and out. They see neither the near shore nor the far shore. They’re born in bonds and die in bonds, and in bonds they go from this world to the next.

§3A learned noble disciple has seen the noble ones, and is skilled and trained in the teaching of the noble ones. They’ve seen true persons, and are skilled and trained in the teaching of the true persons. They don’t regard form as self, self as having form, form in self, or self in form. They’re called a learned noble disciple who is not bound to form, inside or out. They see the near shore and the far shore. They’re free from suffering, I say.

§4They don’t regard feeling … perception … choices … consciousness as self. They’re called a learned noble disciple who is not bound to consciousness, inside or out. They see the near shore and the far shore. They’re free from suffering, I say.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is an unlearned ordinary person who regards form as self said to be?
Correct: A. Bondage on both sides of any boundary the aggregate might seem to mark.
Question 2 of 10
What do they see, according to this discourse?
Correct: A. Bondage obscures even the starting point, not only the destination.
Question 3 of 10
How is this bondage described across a lifetime and beyond?
Correct: A. A condition spanning an entire life and extending across rebirth.
Question 4 of 10
What does the learned noble disciple see, by contrast?
Correct: A. The identical image inverted, clear sight replacing blindness.
Question 5 of 10
What is the noble disciple explicitly said to be, as a result?
Correct: A. Named directly as a consequence of being unbound and seeing both shores.
Question 6 of 10
What does bandhana, giving this discourse and its vagga a shared theme, mean?
Correct: A. A concrete, physically evocative term for what self-identification produces.
Question 7 of 10
What formula does the unlearned person use to regard each aggregate?
Correct: A. The familiar fourfold self-identification formula used throughout this book.
Question 8 of 10
How many aggregates does this contrast apply to?
Correct: A. Form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness, following the standard pattern.
Question 9 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Continuing the setting of the surrounding discourses.
Question 10 of 10
What comes next in Dhammakathikavagga after this discourse?
Correct: A. Moving to the next pair of discourses in this vagga.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0