Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.119

Questioning (2nd)

Dutiyapucchāsutta — Dhammakathikavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, questioning the assembled mendicants directly
Form
The inverse of SN 22.118's question-and-response structure
Length
Short — matching SN 22.118's own length and structure exactly
Northern parallel
Shares its structure and closing formula with SN 22.118
Difficulty
Approachable — best read directly alongside SN 22.118

Why this discourse

The precise inverse of SN 22.118: rather than asking whether the mendicants wrongly self-identify with the aggregates and correcting a "No" into an explicit right view, this discourse asks directly whether they already hold that right view — and receives a "Yes" that requires no correction at all.

Reading guide

Asking about the positive formula directly

"Do you regard form like this: 'This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self'?" — where SN 22.118 asked about the wrong view and had to supply the right one afterward, this discourse asks about the right view directly from the start.

A "Yes" that needs no correction

"Yes, sir" — the mendicants confirm they already hold this understanding, and the Buddha's "Good, mendicants!" here affirms an already-correct answer rather than, as in SN 22.118, prompting a further explicit statement.

The Buddha still restates the formula afterward — "form should be truly seen with right understanding like this" — but now as confirmation of what the mendicants have already affirmed, not as a correction supplying something missing.

Why pair a discourse of correction with one of confirmation

Read together, SN 22.118 and SN 22.119 test the same understanding from both directions: can the mendicants recognize wrong view when asked about it directly (118), and do they already, independently, hold the right view when asked about that directly instead (119)?

Passing both tests together demonstrates something a single question could not: not merely rejecting the wrong formula when presented with it, but actively holding the right one as their own settled view.

Closing into the identical formula

As in SN 22.118, this discourse closes with the same standard sequence — "seeing this... they understand: 'there is nothing further for this place'" — the shared destination both discourses arrive at, whether starting from correction or from confirmation.

Key terms

netaṁ mama nesohamasmi na meso attā — "this is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self" — the formula this discourse asks about directly, unlike SN 22.118's indirect route
āma bhante — "Yes, sir" — the mendicants' confirming response, replacing SN 22.118's "No, sir"
sādhu — good, excellent — the Buddha's approval, now affirming an already-correct answer
yathābhūtaṁ sammappaññāya daṭṭhabbaṁ — "should be truly seen with right understanding" — restated here as confirmation rather than correction
nāparaṁ itthattāyā — "there is nothing further for this place" — the shared closing formula both discourses in this pair arrive at

The text

The complete discourse, the precise inverse of SN 22.118, confirming right view already held. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “What do you think, mendicants? Do you regard form like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self’?” “Yes, sir.” “Good, mendicants! Form should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’

§2Do you regard feeling … perception … choices … consciousness like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self’?” “Yes, sir.” “Good, mendicants! Consciousness should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’

§3Seeing this … They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this discourse's opening question differ from SN 22.118's?
Correct: A. The precise inverse of SN 22.118's question about wrong self-identification.
Question 2 of 10
How do the mendicants respond in this discourse?
Correct: A. Confirming they already hold the right understanding, unlike SN 22.118's negative answer to the wrong-view question.
Question 3 of 10
What does the Buddha's restatement of the formula do in this discourse, compared to SN 22.118?
Correct: A. Confirmation rather than correction, since the mendicants' answer already matched the right view.
Question 4 of 10
What do SN 22.118 and SN 22.119 together test, when read as a pair?
Correct: A. Testing the same understanding from both directions — rejecting the wrong, and holding the right.
Question 5 of 10
What does passing both tests together demonstrate that a single question could not?
Correct: A. A more complete demonstration of settled right view than either question alone could provide.
Question 6 of 10
How does this discourse close?
Correct: A. Both discourses arrive at the same destination, whether starting from correction or confirmation.
Question 7 of 10
How many aggregates does this question-and-answer sequence cover?
Correct: A. Matching SN 22.118's own coverage of all five aggregates.
Question 8 of 10
What formula are the mendicants asked about directly in this discourse?
Correct: A. The negated formula, asked about from the start rather than supplied afterward.
Question 9 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Matching SN 22.118's own setting.
Question 10 of 10
What comes next in Dhammakathikavagga after this pair of discourses?
Correct: A. Moving to the next pair of discourses in this vagga.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0