Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.21

With Ānanda

Ānandasutta — Aniccavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
Venerable Ānanda questions the Buddha directly
Form
A short question-and-answer dialogue, closing the vagga by naming precisely what the preceding twenty discourses' arguments were all building toward
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a plain question with a precisely worded answer, best read as the vagga's summation

Why this discourse

After twenty discourses arguing that the five aggregates are impermanent, suffering, and not-self — directly, by logical derivation, and through their causes — this closing discourse steps back and asks the plainest possible question. Ānanda goes to the Buddha and asks: people speak of “cessation” (nirodha) — the cessation of what things does this refer to? The Buddha's answer names the aggregates precisely, and adds a five-term description of their nature — impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, liable to end, vanish, fade away, and cease — that reads as a compact summary of everything Aniccavagga has spent the preceding twenty discourses establishing.

Reading guide

A question about vocabulary, not about doctrine

Ānanda's question is disarmingly direct: “they speak of ‘cessation.’ The cessation of what things does this refer to?” He is not asking whether cessation is real, or how to attain it, or what it feels like — he is asking what the word itself picks out, treating “cessation” as a term already in wide circulation that nonetheless needs its referent pinned down precisely.

An answer naming the aggregates directly

The Buddha's answer is exact rather than general: form is impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, liable to end, vanish, fade away, and cease — and its cessation is what “cessation” refers to. The same five-term description and the same closing identification repeat for feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness. Cessation, in other words, is not a separate metaphysical event happening somewhere else; it is simply what happens to these five things, described with maximal precision.

A five-term description doing the work of twenty discourses

The five terms applied to each aggregate — impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, liable to end, vanish, fade away, and cease — gather up in a single compact phrase what SN 22.12-20 spent twenty discourses establishing from multiple angles: impermanence stated directly, derived logically, and traced to its cause. “Conditioned” (saṅkhata) and “dependently originated” (paṭiccasamuppanna) specifically recall SN 22.18-20's causal argument, naming the aggregates' dependent status explicitly rather than leaving it implicit.

A fitting close to the vagga's own name

Aniccavagga — the “impermanence chapter” — closes with a discourse that defines, with unusual precision, the single word toward which all its argument had been pointing: not merely that the aggregates change, but that their ending is exactly what the entire tradition means when it speaks of “cessation.” The vagga that opened with SN 22.12's compact four-step chain from seeing impermanence to full freedom closes by naming, with equal compactness, the precise target that freedom consists in reaching.

Key terms

nirodha — “cessation” — the term Ānanda asks the Buddha to define precisely, and the word this discourse's entire dialogue turns on.
saṅkhata — “conditioned” — one of the five descriptive terms the Buddha applies to each aggregate, naming its dependent, constructed nature.
paṭiccasamuppanna — “dependently originated” — a second descriptive term, directly recalling SN 22.18-20's cause-based argument earlier in this vagga.
khayadhamma…vayadhamma…virāgadhamma…nirodhadhamma — “liable to end…vanish…fade away…cease” — the remaining terms in the five-part description, each naming a distinct facet of the same underlying impermanence.
tassa nirodho — “its cessation” — the Buddha's precise answer to Ānanda's question, identifying “cessation” directly with each aggregate's own ending.

The text

The discourse in full. Two elided repetitions (feeling and choices, each following the same five-term description spelled out in full for form and consciousness) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Then Venerable Ānanda went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to the Buddha: “Sir, they speak of ‘cessation’. The cessation of what things does this refer to?” “Ānanda, form is impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, liable to end, vanish, fade away, and cease. Its cessation is what ‘cessation’ refers to.

§2Consciousness is impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, liable to end, vanish, fade away, and cease. Its cessation is what ‘cessation’ refers to. When they speak of ‘cessation’, its the cessation of these things that this refers to.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What question does Ānanda ask the Buddha at the start of this discourse?
Correct: A. A question about the precise referent of a term already in circulation.
Question 2 of 10
What does the Buddha's answer identify "cessation" with?
Correct: A. Nirodha is identified directly with each aggregate's own ending.
Question 3 of 10
What five-term description does the Buddha apply to each aggregate?
Correct: A. A compact summary gathering up the vagga's preceding twenty discourses' arguments.
Question 4 of 10
Which two terms in this description specifically recall SN 22.18-20's earlier cause-based argument?
Correct: A. Saṅkhata and paṭiccasamuppanna name the aggregates' dependent status explicitly.
Question 5 of 10
How does this discourse's question differ from questions about whether cessation is real or how to attain it?
Correct: A. Ānanda treats "cessation" as an existing term needing its referent pinned down precisely.
Question 6 of 10
What role does this discourse play in closing Aniccavagga?
Correct: A. A fitting close to a vagga whose very name, Aniccavagga, means "the impermanence chapter."
Question 7 of 10
How many aggregates does the Buddha's answer apply to?
Correct: A. Feeling and choices are elided but follow the same pattern spelled out for form and consciousness.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Continuing the same setting as the vagga's other discourses.
Question 9 of 10
Who questions the Buddha in this discourse?
Correct: A. A shift from the impersonal direct teachings of SN 22.12-20 to a named questioner.
Question 10 of 10
What comes immediately after this discourse, moving beyond Aniccavagga?
Correct: A. The book's own systematic coverage continues into its next chapter.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0