Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.27

Gratification (2nd)

Dutiyaassādasutta — Bhāravagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, again recounting his own pre-awakening effort in the first person
Form
The same gratification/drawback/escape triad as SN 22.26, now cast as a deliberate, effortful search rather than a spontaneous reflection
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — best read directly after SN 22.26, whose triad it restates in a new register

Why this discourse

This discourse restates SN 22.26's exact three-part framework — gratification, drawback, and escape — but changes its verbs in a way that shifts the whole discourse's character: rather than recalling a moment of reflection (“I thought”), the Buddha describes active, effortful search — “I went in search of form's gratification, and I found it. I've seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of form's gratification.” The same three-part pattern repeats for drawback and escape, and then again for each remaining aggregate. Where SN 22.26 emphasized the content of what was understood, this discourse emphasizes the effort of seeking it out.

Reading guide

The same triad, a different verb of engagement

SN 22.26 used “I thought” and “it occurred to me” — verbs of reflection. This discourse instead uses “I went in search of…and I found it” — verbs of active pursuit and discovery. Both discourses arrive at the identical three terms (gratification, drawback, escape) for the identical five aggregates, but the manner of arriving at them is described quite differently.

A claim of thoroughness, added to each term

Beyond simply finding each of the three, this discourse adds a further claim not present in SN 22.26's wording: “I've seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of form's gratification” — specifying not just that the search succeeded, but that what was found was grasped in its complete scope (yāvatā), leaving nothing further to discover.

The same closing declaration, unchanged

As in SN 22.26, this discourse closes by stating that the Buddha withheld his announcement of awakening until this understanding — now described as a thoroughly searched-out and completely seen understanding — was in place for all five aggregates, followed by the identical knowledge-and-vision declaration that closed the previous discourse.

Two discourses, two aspects of one achievement

Read as a pair, SN 22.26 and this discourse present awakening's content from two angles: SN 22.26 as something reflected on and understood, this discourse as something actively sought, found, and seen in full. Neither discourse is more authoritative than the other; together they present a fuller picture of what the search for awakening involved than either would alone.

Key terms

pariyesanaṁ acariṁ — “I went in search of” — this discourse's distinctive verb of active pursuit, replacing SN 22.26's language of reflection.
adhigamā — “I found it” — the result of the search, paired with each of the three terms in turn.
yāvatā…paññāya sudiṭṭhaṁ — “I've seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of…” — a claim of thoroughness added to each term, not present in SN 22.26's wording.
assāda, ādīnava, nissaraṇa — “gratification, drawback, escape” — the same three terms from SN 22.26, unchanged in content though differently framed.
akuppā me vimutti — “my freedom is unshakable” — the same closing declaration that closed SN 22.26, repeated here unchanged.

The text

The discourse in full. Three elided repetitions (feeling, perception, and choices, each following the same search-and-discovery pattern spelled out in full for form and consciousness) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, I went in search of form’s gratification, and I found it. I’ve seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of form’s gratification. I went in search of form’s drawback, and I found it. I’ve seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of form’s drawback. I went in search of form’s escape, and I found it. I’ve seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of form’s escape.

§2I went in search of consciousness’s escape, and I found it. I’ve seen clearly with wisdom the full extent of consciousness’s escape.

§3As long as I didn’t truly understand these five grasping aggregates’ gratification, drawback, and escape for what they are, I didn’t announce my supreme perfect awakening … But when I did truly understand these five grasping aggregates’ gratification, drawback, and escape for what they are, I announced my supreme perfect awakening … Knowledge and vision arose in me: ‘My freedom is unshakable; this is my last rebirth; now there’ll be no more future lives.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What verb of engagement does this discourse use, differing from SN 22.26's "I thought"?
Correct: A. Verbs of active pursuit and discovery, replacing SN 22.26's language of reflection.
Question 2 of 10
What three terms does this discourse's search apply to, identical to SN 22.26?
Correct: A. The same triad from SN 22.26, unchanged in content.
Question 3 of 10
What additional claim does this discourse add to each term, not present in SN 22.26?
Correct: A. A claim of thoroughness — grasping the term's complete scope, not just finding it.
Question 4 of 10
How does this discourse's closing declaration compare to SN 22.26's?
Correct: A. The same closing content, framed after a differently described search.
Question 5 of 10
How can SN 22.26 and this discourse be read together as a pair?
Correct: A. Together they present a fuller picture than either discourse alone.
Question 6 of 10
How many aggregates does this discourse's search apply to?
Correct: A. Feeling, perception, and choices are elided but follow the same pattern spelled out for form and consciousness.
Question 7 of 10
What does "yāvatā" (the full extent) specify in this discourse's claim?
Correct: A. A claim of thoroughness distinguishing this discourse from SN 22.26's simpler statement.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The teaching is given at Sāvatthī, though its content recalls the pre-awakening search.
Question 9 of 10
What discourse comes immediately after this one?
Correct: A. The third term of the vagga's gratification/drawback/escape trio.
Question 10 of 10
Does this discourse present a different set of three terms from SN 22.26?
Correct: A. The content is unchanged; only the framing verbs differ.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0