Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.33

It's Not Yours

Natumhākasutta — Natumhākavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī, Jeta's Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika's monastery
Speakers
The Buddha, in dialogue with the assembled mendicants
Form
A direct instruction, then a famous simile drawn from the immediate physical surroundings, then the same instruction restated
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — the simile does most of the explanatory work, making the argument unusually vivid

Why this discourse

This discourse opens Natumhākavagga and supplies one of the book's most immediate and physically grounded similes. Rather than reasoning abstractly about why the aggregates aren't self, the Buddha points to something literally lying on the ground around the assembly: the grass, sticks, branches, and leaves scattered through Jeta's Grove itself. If someone carried them off, burned them, or did whatever they liked with them, would the mendicants think, “this person is doing this to us”? Of course not — because that material is neither self nor belonging to self. The discourse then applies the identical logic to the five aggregates: give them up, precisely because they stand in the same relation to a person as Jeta's Grove's fallen leaves do.

Reading guide

An instruction stated before its justification

The discourse opens with the bare instruction: give up what isn't yours, and doing so will be for your welfare and happiness. This is stated for each aggregate in turn before any explanation is offered — the listener is told what to do first, and only then shown why.

A simile drawn from the immediate surroundings

Rather than reaching for an abstract comparison, the Buddha points directly at the physical setting: suppose someone carried off, burned, or otherwise did as they pleased with the grass, sticks, branches, and leaves scattered through Jeta's Grove — the very place where this teaching is being given. Would the mendicants think “this person is carrying us off, burning us”? The question is rhetorical, and the mendicants' own answer supplies the reasoning: no, because that material is “neither self nor belonging to self.”

The same logic applied directly to the aggregates

The discourse closes by mapping the simile back onto its target with no remaining gap: “in the same way, mendicants, form isn't yours: give it up.” The aggregates are placed in precisely the same category as the fallen leaves — something present, usable, and even valuable in its own way, but not something whose handling by outside forces constitutes an assault on a self.

A vagga named for its opening instruction, not its simile

Despite the vividness of the Jeta's Grove image, Natumhākavagga takes its name from the discourse's plainer opening phrase — “it's not yours” — rather than from the simile itself. This pattern (vagga named after a discourse's core claim rather than its most memorable illustration) recurs elsewhere in this saṃyutta, and is worth noting alongside Bhāravagga's own naming after SN 22.22's central image.

Key terms

na tumhākaṁ — “it's not yours” — the discourse's title phrase and the vagga's own name, applied to each aggregate in turn.
pajahatha — “give up” — the discourse's central imperative verb, addressed directly to the mendicants.
hitāya sukhāya — “for welfare and happiness” — the promised result of giving up what isn't one's own, repeated after every instruction.
tiṇakaṭṭhasākhāpalāsa — “grass, sticks, branches, and leaves” — the specific physical material the simile points to, drawn from the immediate setting of Jeta's Grove itself.
na attā na attaniya — “neither self nor belonging to self” — the mendicants' own explanation for why the grove's fallen material provokes no sense of personal assault, mapped directly onto the aggregates.

The text

The discourse in full. Three elided repetitions in each half (feeling, perception, and choices, each following the same instruction and simile spelled out in full for form and consciousness) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, give up what’s not yours. Giving it up will be for your welfare and happiness. And what isn’t yours? Form isn’t yours: give it up. Giving it up will be for your welfare and happiness.

§2Consciousness isn’t yours: give it up. Giving it up will be for your welfare and happiness.

§3Suppose a person was to carry off the grass, sticks, branches, and leaves in this Jeta’s Grove, or burn them, or do what they want with them. Would you think: ‘This person is carrying us off, burning us, or doing what they want with us’?” “No, sir. Why is that? Because to us that’s neither self nor belonging to self.”

§4“In the same way, mendicants, form isn’t yours: give it up. Giving it up will be for your welfare and happiness.

§5Consciousness isn’t yours: give it up. Giving it up will be for your welfare and happiness.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What instruction opens this discourse?
Correct: A. Stated for each aggregate before any explanation is offered.
Question 2 of 10
What physical objects does the Buddha's simile point to?
Correct: A. Drawn directly from the immediate physical surroundings of the teaching itself.
Question 3 of 10
Why do the mendicants say they wouldn't feel assaulted if someone burned or carried off that material?
Correct: A. Na attā na attaniya — the mendicants' own reasoning, then mapped directly onto the aggregates.
Question 4 of 10
How does the discourse close its argument?
Correct: A. No remaining gap between the illustration and its target.
Question 5 of 10
What does Natumhākavagga take its name from?
Correct: A. A naming pattern (core claim over memorable illustration) seen elsewhere in this saṃyutta.
Question 6 of 10
How many aggregates does this discourse's instruction apply to?
Correct: A. Feeling, perception, and choices are elided but follow the same pattern.
Question 7 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The specific setting is essential to the simile's immediacy — the grove itself is the example.
Question 8 of 10
What promised result follows from giving up what isn't yours?
Correct: A. Hitāya sukhāya, repeated after every instance of the instruction.
Question 9 of 10
What discourse comes immediately after this one?
Correct: A. A shorter paired discourse, mirroring the vagga's opening instruction.
Question 10 of 10
Is the simile in this discourse an abstract comparison or drawn from the immediate setting?
Correct: A. Its immediacy is part of what makes the simile unusually vivid and persuasive.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0