Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.4

Hāliddikāni (2nd)

Dutiyahāliddikānisutta — Nakulapituvagga

Setting
Steep Mountain, near Kuraraghara, in the land of the Avantis
Speakers
The householder Hāliddikāni questions Venerable Mahākaccāna a second time
Form
The same request-and-gloss structure as SN 22.3, compressed to a single question over a shorter verse
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — shorter and simpler than SN 22.3, a single gloss rather than four

Why this discourse

Where SN 22.3 needed four separate glosses to unpack a four-line verse, this discourse needs only one, because its source verse asks a single question: what does it mean for ascetics and brahmins freed by craving's ending to have reached “the ultimate goal”? The verse comes from “The Questions of Sakka” (Sakkapañha, corresponding to DN 21), spoken originally to the king of the gods. Mahākaccāna's answer is compact: it is the ending of desire, greed, relishing, and craving for each of the five aggregates that counts as the mind being “well freed” (suvimuttacitta). Paired with SN 22.3, this discourse shows the same disciple's gloss-by-detail method working at two different scales — four images or one.

Reading guide

A shorter verse, a single question

Hāliddikāni returns to Mahākaccāna with a second brief statement, this time from “The Questions of Sakka”: ascetics and brahmins freed by the ending of craving have reached the ultimate goal, the ultimate sanctuary from the yoke, the ultimate spiritual life, the ultimate end, and are best among gods and humans. Unlike SN 22.3's four separate images, this verse poses one compressed claim, and Mahākaccāna's answer meets it with one compressed gloss.

The mind called "well freed"

Mahākaccāna's answer takes each aggregate in turn: consider any desire, greed, relishing, and craving for the form element, together with any attraction, grasping, mental fixation, insistence, and underlying tendencies toward it. With the ending, fading away, cessation, giving up, and letting go of that whole cluster, the mind is said to be well freed. The same sentence then repeats for feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness — five aggregates, one recurring formula, one recurring verdict.

Two glosses of the same verb, side by side

Read together, SN 22.3 and SN 22.4 gloss two different things the Aṭṭhakavagga and its neighboring verse collections say about the freed mind: SN 22.3's verse described what such a person is not tied to (bastion, abode, town, expectation, argument); SN 22.4's verse describes what such a person has positively reached (the ultimate goal, sanctuary, spiritual life, end). Mahākaccāna's method stays constant across both: locate the aggregates underneath the verse's abstract praise or restraint, and show exactly what ending or absence of craving toward each one amounts to.

A borrowed verse, not an ordinary teaching

Both of Hāliddikāni's questions share a structure worth noticing: he does not ask Mahākaccāna to teach him something new, but to explain something the Buddha already said elsewhere, in a different collection, to a different audience (Māgandiya in one case, Sakka, king of the gods, in the other). This discourse and SN 22.3 together function as a small window onto how verses traveled between collections and got unpacked in prose by name disciples once removed from their original setting.

Key terms

suvimuttacitta — “well freed” mind — the verdict Mahākaccāna's gloss arrives at for each aggregate once craving toward it has fully ended.
accantaniṭṭha — “ultimate end” — one of the four honorific titles the quoted verse gives those freed by craving's ending, alongside ultimate goal, sanctuary, and spiritual life.
yogakkhema — “sanctuary from the yoke” — a term for safety from the bonds (sensuality, existence, views, ignorance) that yoke beings to continued wandering.
anusaya — “underlying tendency” — part of the full cluster (alongside attraction, grasping, mental fixation, and insistence) that must end for the mind to count as well freed.
Sakkapañha — “The Questions of Sakka” — the source collection of this discourse's quoted verse, corresponding to DN 21, originally addressed to the king of the gods.

The text

The discourse in full. One elided repetition (the aggregate-by-aggregate gloss, spelled out once for form and then compressed for the remaining four) is given exactly as bilara-data preserves it. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1So I have heard. At one time Venerable Mahākaccāna was staying in the land of the Avantis near Kuraraghara on Steep Mountain. Then the householder Hāliddikāni went up to Venerable Mahākaccāna … and asked him, “Sir, this was said by the Buddha in ‘The Questions of Sakka’: ‘Those ascetics and brahmins who are freed due to the ending of craving have reached the ultimate goal, the ultimate sanctuary from the yoke, the ultimate spiritual life, the ultimate end, and are best among gods and humans.’ How should we see the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement?”

§2“Householder, consider any desire, greed, relishing, and craving for the form element; any attraction, grasping, mental fixation, insistence, and underlying tendencies. With the ending, fading away, cessation, giving away, and letting go of that, the mind is said to be ‘well freed’.

§3Consider any desire, greed, relishing, and craving for the feeling element … the perception element … the choices element … the consciousness element; any attraction, grasping, mental fixation, insistence, and underlying tendencies. With the ending, fading away, cessation, giving away, and letting go of that, the mind is said to be ‘well freed’.

§4So, householder, that’s how to understand the detailed meaning of what the Buddha said in brief in ‘The Questions of Sakka’: ‘Those ascetics and brahmins who are freed due to the ending of craving have reached the ultimate goal, the ultimate sanctuary from the yoke, the ultimate spiritual life, the ultimate end, and are best among gods and humans.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
Which collection is this discourse's quoted verse drawn from?
Correct: A. A different source from SN 22.3's Aṭṭhakavagga verse, originally addressed to Sakka, king of the gods.
Question 2 of 10
What does the quoted verse claim about those freed by craving's ending?
Correct: A. Four honorific titles applied to the craving-free mind.
Question 3 of 10
What does Mahākaccāna's gloss identify as needing to end for the mind to be "well freed"?
Correct: A. A full cluster of attachment-related terms, applied aggregate by aggregate.
Question 4 of 10
How does this discourse's structure compare to SN 22.3's?
Correct: A. Same questioner, same method, applied at a smaller scale.
Question 5 of 10
What term names "safety from the bonds" that yoke beings to continued wandering?
Correct: A. One of the four ultimate titles the verse applies to the freed.
Question 6 of 10
Who questions Mahākaccāna in this discourse?
Correct: A. Continuity with SN 22.3's questioner and setting.
Question 7 of 10
What structural pattern do SN 22.3 and SN 22.4 share?
Correct: A. The recurring request-and-gloss form binding this small pair together.
Question 8 of 10
Where does this discourse take place?
Correct: A. Same setting as SN 22.3.
Question 9 of 10
What happens to the aggregate-by-aggregate gloss after form is spelled out in full?
Correct: A. A standard peyyāla compression, preserved as-is in the source.
Question 10 of 10
How does the next discourse, SN 22.5, shift the topic?
Correct: A. A shift from exegesis to direct instruction, closing this small Hāliddikāni pair.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0