Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.45

Impermanence

Aniccasutta — Attadīpavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the assembled mendicants
Form
The three-marks chain from Aniccavagga, extended with a further multi-step liberation sequence
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — builds on SN 22.15's chain from Aniccavagga, worth reading with that discourse in mind

Why this discourse

This discourse reaches back to SN 22.15's chain from Aniccavagga — form is impermanent, what's impermanent is suffering, what's suffering is not-self, and what's not-self should be seen as not mine — but does not stop where SN 22.15 stopped. It continues into a longer sequence: seeing this way, the mind becomes dispassionate and freed from defilements by not grasping; being free, it's stable; being stable, it's content; being content, one is not anxious; not being anxious, one personally becomes extinguished. The discourse thus links Aniccavagga's earlier logical chain to a fuller account of what actually follows from seeing it through to the end.

Reading guide

The three-marks chain, reused rather than restated from scratch

The discourse's opening four steps — impermanent, therefore suffering, therefore not-self, therefore to be seen as not mine — are word for word identical to SN 22.15's chain from Aniccavagga. Rather than introducing new logical content, this discourse takes that established chain as its starting point and asks what happens next.

A five-step continuation not given in SN 22.15

Where SN 22.15 stopped at “this is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self,” this discourse continues: the mind becomes dispassionate and freed from defilements by not grasping; being free, it's stable; being stable, it's content; being content, one is not anxious; not being anxious, one personally becomes extinguished (parinibbāyati). Each step depends strictly on the one before it, extending the earlier chain by five further links.

A summary restatement applying to all five elements at once

After running through this extended chain for each aggregate individually, the discourse adds a further compressed restatement: if a mendicant's mind is dispassionate toward the form element, the feeling element, the perception element, the choices element, and the consciousness element, it is freed from defilements by not grasping — the same five-step sequence (stable, content, not anxious, personally extinguished) then follows once more, this time stated collectively rather than aggregate by aggregate.

Closing on the same declaration that closed SN 22.12

The discourse ends with the identical four-part arahant declaration used to close SN 22.12 at the very start of Aniccavagga — rebirth ended, the spiritual journey completed, what had to be done done, nothing further for this place — tying this discourse's extended chain back to the book's most basic liberation formula even as it adds five new intervening steps that formula did not spell out.

Key terms

virāgā vimuccati anupādāya — “freed from defilements by not grasping” — the first of the new steps this discourse adds beyond SN 22.15's chain.
ṭhitaṁ — “stable” — the second new step, following directly from freedom.
santusitaṁ — “content” — the third new step, following from stability.
aparitassaṁ — “not anxious” — the fourth new step, recalling the vocabulary of paritassanā (anxiety) from SN 22.7-8 earlier in the book.
paccattaññeva parinibbāyati — “personally becomes extinguished” — the fifth and final new step, the discourse's furthest extension beyond SN 22.15's original chain.

The text

The discourse in full. Three elided repetitions in the aggregate-by-aggregate exposition (feeling, perception, and choices, each following the same extended chain spelled out in full for form and consciousness) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, form is impermanent. What’s impermanent is suffering. What’s suffering is not-self. And what’s not-self should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ Seeing truly with right understanding like this, the mind becomes dispassionate and freed from defilements by not grasping.

§2Consciousness is impermanent. What’s impermanent is suffering. What’s suffering is not-self. And what’s not-self should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ Seeing truly with right understanding like this, the mind becomes dispassionate and freed from defilements by not grasping.

§3If a mendicant’s mind is dispassionate towards the form element, the feeling element, the perception element, the choices element, and the consciousness element, it’s freed from defilements by not grasping. Being free, it’s stable. Being stable, it’s content. Being content, they’re not anxious. Not being anxious, they personally become extinguished.

§4They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What earlier discourse's chain does this discourse's opening four steps reuse word for word?
Correct: A. Impermanent, therefore suffering, therefore not-self, therefore to be seen as not mine.
Question 2 of 10
What is the first of the new steps this discourse adds beyond SN 22.15's chain?
Correct: A. The first of five new links extending SN 22.15's original four-step chain.
Question 3 of 10
What is the final step in this discourse's extended chain?
Correct: A. The furthest point this discourse's chain reaches, following from being not anxious.
Question 4 of 10
What does the discourse add after running the extended chain aggregate by aggregate?
Correct: A. Dispassion toward all five elements together, followed by the same stable-content-not anxious-extinguished sequence.
Question 5 of 10
What declaration closes this discourse, identical to SN 22.12's closing?
Correct: A. Tying this discourse's extended chain back to Aniccavagga's most basic liberation formula.
Question 6 of 10
What vocabulary does "not anxious" (aparitassaṁ) recall from earlier in the book?
Correct: A. A deliberate echo of terminology used earlier in Khandhavagga.
Question 7 of 10
How many aggregates does this discourse's extended chain apply to?
Correct: A. Feeling, perception, and choices are elided but follow the same pattern.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Continuing the same setting as the vagga's other discourses.
Question 9 of 10
How does this discourse relate to SN 22.15?
Correct: A. Reusing established content rather than reintroducing new logical content.
Question 10 of 10
What discourse comes immediately after this one?
Correct: A. A companion discourse building on the same chain with a distinct addition of its own.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0