Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.77

The Perfected Ones (2nd)

Dutiyaarahantasutta — Khajjanīyavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the assembled mendicants
Form
SN 22.76's prose section restated in an even more compressed form, without its closing verse
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — shorter than SN 22.76, its content otherwise unchanged

Why this discourse

This discourse restates SN 22.76's core claim — the three-marks chain through to freedom, closing with the claim that the perfected ones stand foremost among all sentient beings up to the pinnacle of existence — but in an even more compressed prose than SN 22.76 used, and without the eight-verse poem entirely. Where SN 22.76 spelled the impermanence chain out separately for form and consciousness (eliding only the three aggregates in between), this discourse states the chain once, for form alone, before moving directly to the collective disillusionment covering all five aggregates together.

Reading guide

A single pass through the chain, not one per aggregate

This discourse states the impermanence chain only once — form is impermanent, what's impermanent is suffering, what's suffering is not-self, and what's not-self should be seen as not mine — without separately restating or eliding it for feeling, perception, choices, or consciousness the way SN 22.76 did. The chain then moves directly to disillusionment with all five aggregates named together in a single collective clause.

The poem simply absent, not summarized or referenced

Unlike some other discourses in this book that explicitly point back to an earlier fuller statement with an ellipsis or cross-reference, this discourse simply ends where SN 22.76's prose section ended, with no indication that a poem exists elsewhere or that anything has been omitted. The prose stands as a complete discourse in its own right.

What the pairing suggests about the poem's role

Read together, SN 22.76 and this discourse suggest the poem functioned as an optional celebratory elaboration rather than a required component of the teaching itself — the same relationship SN 22.33 and SN 22.34 showed earlier in this book between a discourse with a vivid simile and its plainer companion lacking one.

A shorter discourse before the vagga's next major image

This discourse's brevity offers a brief pause before SN 22.78's extended lion simile, which will develop the very image SN 22.76's poem closed on — the lion's roar — into a full narrative comparison spanning the discourse's entire structure.

Key terms

tilakkhaṇa — the “three marks” — impermanence, suffering, and not-self, opening this discourse's chain unchanged from SN 22.76.
bhavagga — “the pinnacle of existence” — the same outer boundary named in SN 22.76's closing claim, repeated here unchanged.
khīṇā jāti…nāparaṁ itthattāya — “rebirth is ended…nothing further for this place” — the standard arahant declaration, identical to SN 22.76's.
aggā ca seṭṭhā ca — “foremost and best” — the description applied to the perfected ones across all abodes of sentient beings, unchanged from SN 22.76.
gāthā — “verse” — the element present in SN 22.76 but entirely absent from this discourse.

The text

The discourse in full. Elided repetitions (feeling, perception, and choices, spelled out in full for form and consciousness) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, form is impermanent. What’s impermanent is suffering. What’s suffering is not-self. And what’s not-self should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’

§2Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness. Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed. They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’ As far as there are abodes of sentient beings, even up until the pinnacle of existence, the perfected ones are the foremost and the best.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this discourse's chain compare to SN 22.76's?
Correct: A. SN 22.76 spelled the chain out for both form and consciousness; this discourse states it only once.
Question 2 of 10
What is absent from this discourse that SN 22.76 included?
Correct: A. This discourse's prose ends without any verse following it.
Question 3 of 10
How does this discourse indicate that content has been omitted?
Correct: A. The prose stands as a complete discourse in its own right.
Question 4 of 10
What does this pairing (SN 22.76 and this discourse) suggest about the poem's role?
Correct: A. The same relationship SN 22.33-34 showed earlier in this book between simile and plainer companion.
Question 5 of 10
What claim does this discourse's closing sentence make?
Correct: A. Identical to SN 22.76's closing claim, unchanged in wording.
Question 6 of 10
How does this discourse name the aggregates across its two parts?
Correct: A. A distinctive compression: the chain is stated once for form, then the scope widens to all five in the very next clause.
Question 7 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Continuing the same setting as SN 22.76.
Question 8 of 10
What discourse comes immediately after this one?
Correct: A. SN 22.76's closing poetic image, developed at full length.
Question 9 of 10
Who speaks in this discourse?
Correct: A. A direct teaching, consistent with SN 22.76's prose section.
Question 10 of 10
What role does this discourse's brevity serve, positioned before SN 22.78?
Correct: A. SN 22.78 will develop the lion's roar into a full narrative comparison.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0