Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.81

At Pārileyyaka

Pārileyyasutta — Khajjanīyavagga

Setting
Kosambī, then Pārileyyaka, at the root of a sacred sal tree
Speakers
The Buddha, narrated withdrawing alone, then teaching mendicants who seek him out, prompted by one monk's unspoken question
Form
A narrative frame around the Buddha's solitary withdrawal, followed by a systematic analysis of nine possible views, each traced to one root cause
Length
~6 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — one of the most systematically comprehensive doctrinal analyses in this vagga

Why this discourse

This discourse is set at Pārileyyaka, the location traditionally associated with one of the canon's most famous episodes — the Buddha's withdrawal into solitude after leaving a quarreling Kosambī community, an episode elsewhere elaborated with the well-known image of an elephant and monkey serving him in the forest, though this discourse itself narrates only the withdrawal and Ānanda's response, not that further detail. Once several mendicants seek him out for a Dhamma talk, the Buddha addresses a mendicant's unspoken thought — how does one know and see to end defilements without delay — with a systematic analysis tracing nine distinct possible views, including a view quoting SN 22.55's own resolution almost verbatim, all back to the identical single root cause.

Reading guide

A withdrawal narrated plainly, without further elaboration

The Buddha, without informing his attendants or the Saṅgha, sets out walking alone after his morning almsround, traveling stage by stage until he reaches Pārileyyaka and settles at the root of a sacred sal tree. When a mendicant reports this to Ānanda, his response is brief and clear: “when the Buddha leaves like this it means he wants to stay alone. At this time no-one should follow him.”

Even after comprehensive teaching, one monk still wonders

When mendicants eventually do seek the Buddha out at Pārileyyaka for a Dhamma talk, he first names everything he has already taught “analytically” — the four kinds of mindfulness meditation, the four right efforts, the four bases of psychic power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven awakening factors, and the noble eightfold path (together, the thirty-seven aids to awakening) — before noting that despite all this, one mendicant present still silently wonders how to end the defilements without delay.

Four self-view configurations, extended to all five aggregates

The Buddha's answer works through the fourfold self-identification formula from SN 22.7 one configuration at a time — form as self, self as having form, form in self, self in form — before extending to feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness regarded as self. Each configuration is named a “conditioned phenomenon” (saṅkhāra) with a traceable source: struck by feelings born of contact with ignorance, craving arises, and the view is born from that.

Three further views, one of them SN 22.55's own resolution

The discourse then names three further possible views, each traced to the identical root: the eternalist view (“the self and the cosmos are one and the same… permanent, everlasting, eternal”); the annihilationist view, quoting SN 22.55's exact opening resolution almost word for word (“I might not be, and it might not be mine…”) — here classified as a view requiring the identical diagnosis, not the liberating insight SN 22.55 praised it as; and finally simple doubt and uncertainty about the true teaching. All nine configurations — the four self-views repeated across five aggregates, plus these three further views — trace back to the same single chain: ignorance, contact, feeling, craving, and the conditioned view born from that craving.

Key terms

bodhipakkhiyā dhammā — the “thirty-seven aids to awakening” — the full set the Buddha names as already taught analytically before addressing the mendicant's remaining silent question.
saṅkhāra — “conditioned phenomenon” — the term applied to every one of the nine views this discourse analyzes, including the act of regarding an aggregate as self.
avijjāsamphassajena vedayitena phuṭṭho taṇhā uppajjati — “struck by feelings born of contact with ignorance, craving arises” — the single causal chain this discourse traces every one of its nine views back to.
sassataditthi — “eternalist view” — the claim that self and cosmos are identical and permanent, one of the three further views analyzed.
ucchedadiṭṭhi — “annihilationist view” — quoting SN 22.55's own resolution nearly verbatim, but here classified as a view requiring the same diagnosis as every other configuration in this discourse.

The text

The discourse in full. Elided repetitions across its nine analyzed configurations (each following the same causal pattern spelled out in full for the first) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Kosambī, in Ghosita’s Monastery. Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Kosambī for alms. After the meal, on his return from almsround, he set his lodgings in order himself. Taking his bowl and robe, without informing his attendants or taking leave of the mendicant Saṅgha, he set out to go wandering alone, with no companion.

§2Then, not long after the Buddha had left, one of the mendicants went to Venerable Ānanda and told him what had happened. Ānanda said, “Reverend, when the Buddha leaves like this it means he wants to stay alone. At this time no-one should follow him.”

§3Then the Buddha, traveling stage by stage, arrived at Pārileyyaka, where he stayed at the root of a sacred sal tree. Then several mendicants went up to Venerable Ānanda and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, they sat down to one side and said to him, “Reverend, it’s been a long time since we’ve heard a Dhamma talk from the Buddha. We wish to hear a Dhamma talk from the Buddha.”

§4Then Venerable Ānanda together with those mendicants went to Pārileyyaka to see the Buddha. They bowed and sat down to one side, and the Buddha educated, encouraged, fired up, and inspired them with a Dhamma talk. Now at that time one of the monks had the thought, “How do you know and see in order to end the defilements without delay?” Then the Buddha, knowing that monk’s train of thought, addressed the mendicants: “Mendicants, I’ve taught the Dhamma analytically. I’ve analytically taught the four kinds of mindfulness meditation, the four right efforts, the four bases of psychic power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven awakening factors, and the noble eightfold path. That’s how I’ve taught the Dhamma analytically. Though I’ve taught the Dhamma analytically, still a certain mendicant present here has this thought: ‘How do you know and see in order to end the defilements without delay?’

§5And how, mendicants, do you know and see in order to end the defilements without delay? Take an unlearned ordinary person who has not seen the noble ones, and is neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the noble ones. They’ve not seen true persons, and are neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the true persons. They regard form as self. But that regarding is just a conditioned phenomenon. And what’s the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of that conditioned phenomenon? When an unlearned ordinary person is struck by feelings born of contact with ignorance, craving arises. That conditioned phenomenon is born from that. So that conditioned phenomenon is impermanent, conditioned, and dependently originated. And that craving, that feeling, that contact, and that ignorance are also impermanent, conditioned, and dependently originated. That’s how you should know and see in order to end the defilements without delay.

§6Perhaps they don’t regard form as self, or self as possessing form, or form in self, or self in form. But they regard feeling as self … perception as self … choices as self … consciousness as self … But that regarding is just a conditioned phenomenon. And what’s the source of that conditioned phenomenon? When an unlearned ordinary person is struck by feelings born of contact with ignorance, craving arises. That conditioned phenomenon is born from that. So that conditioned phenomenon is impermanent, conditioned, and dependently originated. And that craving, that feeling, that contact, and that ignorance are also impermanent, conditioned, and dependently originated. That’s how you should know and see in order to end the defilements without delay.

§7Perhaps they don’t regard form or feeling or perception or choices or consciousness as self. Still, they have such a view: ‘The self and the cosmos are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, and imperishable.’ But that eternalist view is just a conditioned phenomenon. And what’s the source of that conditioned phenomenon? … That’s how you should know and see in order to end the defilements without delay.

§8Perhaps they don’t regard form or feeling or perception or choices or consciousness as self. Nor do they have such a view: ‘The self and the cosmos are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, and imperishable.’ Still, they have such a view: ‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine.’ But that annihilationist view is just a conditioned phenomenon. And what’s the source of that conditioned phenomenon? … That’s how you should know and see in order to end the defilements without delay.

§9Perhaps they don’t regard form or feeling or perception or choices or consciousness as self. Nor do they have such a view: ‘The self and the cosmos are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, and imperishable.’ Nor do they have such a view: ‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine.’ Still, they have doubts and uncertainties. They’re undecided about the true teaching. That doubt and uncertainty, the indecision about the true teaching, is just a conditioned phenomenon. And what’s the source of that conditioned phenomenon? When an unlearned ordinary person is struck by feelings born of contact with ignorance, craving arises. That conditioned phenomenon is born from that. So that conditioned phenomenon is impermanent, conditioned, and dependently originated. And that craving, that feeling, that contact, and that ignorance are also impermanent, conditioned, and dependently originated. That’s how you should know and see in order to end the defilements without delay.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does the Buddha do at the start of this discourse, without informing anyone?
Correct: A. The episode traditionally associated with the Buddha's famous solitary withdrawal from Kosambī.
Question 2 of 10
How does Ānanda respond when told the Buddha has left?
Correct: A. A brief, clear response showing Ānanda's understanding of the Buddha's intent.
Question 3 of 10
What does the Buddha name as already taught "analytically" before addressing the remaining question?
Correct: A. Despite this comprehensive teaching, one mendicant still silently wonders how to end defilements.
Question 4 of 10
What single causal chain does the discourse trace every one of its nine analyzed views back to?
Correct: A. Ignorance, contact, feeling, and craving, identical across all nine configurations.
Question 5 of 10
What earlier discourse's resolution does this discourse quote nearly verbatim, but treat differently?
Correct: A. SN 22.55 praised this resolution as liberating; this discourse treats it as one more conditioned view to see through.
Question 6 of 10
What three further views does the discourse name beyond the fourfold self-identification formula?
Correct: A. Completing the discourse's total of nine analyzed configurations.
Question 7 of 10
How does the discourse treat the fourfold self-identification formula from SN 22.7?
Correct: A. Form as self, self as having form, form in self, self in form — each named a distinct conditioned phenomenon.
Question 8 of 10
What prompts the Buddha's analysis in this discourse?
Correct: A. The Buddha addresses the thought before the mendicant voices it aloud.
Question 9 of 10
How many aggregates does the self-identification analysis extend across?
Correct: A. The fourfold formula applied first to form in detail, then extended to the remaining four.
Question 10 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. A location traditionally associated with a famous episode in the Buddha's life.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0