The bare opening question alone, mirroring SN 24.11's own compression
Length
Under a minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — trivially brief on its own, best read as SN 24.11's direct completion
Why this discourse
Completes the finite/infinite pair SN 24.11 opened, closing this vagga's second pair of undetermined questions with the identical minimal treatment: the bare claim, then an ellipsis and two empty source keys, trusting SN 24.9's fuller treatment to carry the diagnostic through by memory.
Reading guide
The mirror claim, at the same compression
"The cosmos is infinite" — SN 24.11's direct negation, examined at exactly the same minimal length: one opening line, then nothing further written out.
Two pairs now complete, at two different depths
SN 24.9–10 (eternal/not eternal) still preserved a compressed but genuine catechism; SN 24.11–12 (finite/infinite) preserve only the bare question — a visible second step down in how much the source text is willing to spell out as the vagga proceeds.
A cosmological question, diagnosed the same way as a moral one
Whether the cosmos has spatial limits or not is, on its face, a question of physics or cosmology rather than ethics — yet this vagga diagnoses it by exactly the same aggregate-grasping mechanism it applied to SN 24.6's amoralism or SN 24.5's nihilism, treating cosmological speculation and moral doctrine as arising from the identical root.
Two pairs down, three to go
With this discourse, this vagga has completed two of its five pairs of undetermined questions (eternal/not-eternal, finite/infinite), moving next to the soul-and-body pair before reaching the four questions about a realized one's status after death.
Key terms
anantavā loko — the cosmos is infinite — this discourse's claim, the direct negation of SN 24.11's
peyyāla — an elision mark — compressing this discourse to the same minimal length as SN 24.11
upādāya... abhinivissa — grasping... and insisting on — the formula this discourse's compression trusts the reader to supply
kaṅkhā pahīnā — doubt given up — this vagga's standing criterion for stream-entry, implied though unwritten here
sotāpanno avinipātadhammo niyato sambodhiparāyano — a stream-enterer, not liable to be reborn in the underworld, assured, destined for awakening — this vagga's standing conclusion
The text
The complete discourse as bilara-data preserves it: the opening question alone. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).
§1At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does the view arise: ‘The cosmos is infinite’?” …
· · ·
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.
Question 1 of 10
What claim does this discourse examine?
Correct: A. SN 24.11's direct negation, completing the finite/infinite pair.
Question 2 of 10
How does this discourse's compression compare to SN 24.11's?
Correct: A. The same minimal treatment mirroring its paired opposite.
Question 3 of 10
How do SN 24.9–10's compression and SN 24.11–12's compare?
Correct: A. A visible second step down in how much the source spells out.
Question 4 of 10
What kind of question is "is the cosmos infinite" on its face?
Correct: A. Yet diagnosed by the same mechanism applied to explicitly moral doctrines like SN 24.6's amoralism.
Question 5 of 10
What does this vagga's uniform diagnostic treatment across cosmology and ethics suggest?
Correct: A. The same aggregate-grasping mechanism applied regardless of a view's subject matter.
Question 6 of 10
How many of this vagga's five pairs of undetermined questions are complete after this discourse?
Correct: A. Moving next to the soul-and-body pair.
Question 7 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Matching the setting of most of this book's discourses.
Question 8 of 10
What pair of questions comes next after this discourse?
Correct: A. SN 24.13–14, this vagga's third pair.
Question 9 of 10
What discourse still supplies the fullest version of the pattern this discourse relies on?
Correct: A. This vagga's own fullest treatment of the undetermined-questions template.
Question 10 of 10
What does this discourse's conclusion structurally certify, though unwritten in the source?
Correct: A. This vagga's standing formula, implied by the established pattern.
