Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 3.23

The World

Lokasutta

Setting
At Sāvatthī; no further narrative detail given
Speakers
The Buddha and King Pasenadi of Kosala
Form
A direct question in prose, a threefold answer, and a closing verse identical to SN 3.2's
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — brief, best read directly against SN 3.2 for what changes and what doesn't

Why this discourse

This discourse asks a question with a single word changed from SN 3.2: not how many things arise inside a person for harm, but how many things arise in the world for its harm, suffering, and discomfort. The answer is identical — greed, hate, and delusion — and the closing verse repeats SN 3.2's bamboo simile word for word, scaling the same three roots from an individual's inner life up to the world as a whole.

Reading guide

One word changed: person to world

The entire discourse is a near-exact repeat of SN 3.2, with ‘a person’ (puggala) replaced by ‘the world’ (loka) throughout — the question, the threefold answer, and the closing verse all otherwise unchanged.

A move from individual harm to collective harm

The substitution is not merely verbal; it reframes the same three roots as operating at a different scale — not just damaging the individual in whom they arise, but constituting a source of harm for the world as a shared whole, without needing any new vocabulary to make that shift.

The same verse, doing the same work at a new scale

The bamboo simile — a plant destroyed by its own fruit — is repeated word for word from SN 3.2, applying unchanged even though its subject has widened from ‘a person of wicked heart’ to something closer to the world's own collective condition.

A pairing this book has used before

This discourse joins SN 2.13 and other instances of verbatim or near-verbatim repetition across unrelated discourses already noted in this collection, here inside a single saṃyutta rather than across two different books.

What the repetition itself suggests

That the identical teaching applies without modification whether the subject is one person or the world entire suggests these three roots are not scale-dependent — the same greed, hate, and delusion said to harm an individual are, in aggregate, exactly what harms the world, with no separate explanation required for the larger case.

Key terms

loka — “the world” — the single substituted term that distinguishes this discourse from SN 3.2, its near-identical predecessor.
lobha — “greed” — the first of the three things named as arising in the world for its harm, unchanged from SN 3.2.
dosa — “hate” — the second of the three, likewise unchanged.
moha — “delusion” — the third and final of the three, completing the identical triad.
veḷu — “bamboo” — the closing verse's self-destructive image, repeated word for word from SN 3.2.

The text

The discourse in full: the king's question, the Buddha's threefold answer, and the closing verse shared word for word with SN 3.2. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Seated to one side, King Pasenadi said to the Buddha, “Sir, how many things arise in the world for its harm, suffering, and discomfort?” “Great king, three things arise in the world for its harm, suffering, and discomfort. What three? Greed, hate, and delusion. These three things arise in the world for its harm, suffering, and discomfort.”

§2“When greed, hate, and delusion, originate inside oneself, they harm a person of wicked heart, as a bamboo is destroyed by its own fruit.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What single word distinguishes this discourse's question from SN 3.2's?
Correct: A. The entire discourse is a near-exact repeat of SN 3.2 with this one substitution.
Question 2 of 10
What three things does this discourse name as arising in the world?
Correct: A. Identical to SN 3.2's answer, unchanged despite the shift in scale.
Question 3 of 10
What does the closing verse repeat from SN 3.2?
Correct: A. Applying unchanged even though the subject has widened from an individual to the world.
Question 4 of 10
What does the substitution of “world” for “person” reframe?
Correct: A. Without needing any new vocabulary to make the shift from individual to collective harm.
Question 5 of 10
What does this repetition suggest about greed, hate, and delusion?
Correct: A. The same triad harms both scales without requiring separate explanation.
Question 6 of 10
What earlier pattern in this collection does this discourse's repetition resemble?
Correct: A. Here occurring within a single saṃyutta rather than across two different books.
Question 7 of 10
How is this repetition different from SN 2.13's relationship to SN 2.2?
Correct: A. A structural variation on a pattern this collection has already used.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. A bare setting note, consistent with several discourses in this collection.
Question 9 of 10
What kind of person does the closing verse say these three things harm?
Correct: A. The verse's own description, unchanged from SN 3.2.
Question 10 of 10
How long is this discourse, relative to most others in this vagga?
Correct: A. A compact repetition rather than an extended new teaching.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0