The wanderer Vacchagotta questions the Buddha (by cross-reference)
Form
The most severely compressed cycle yet: a single line naming only the setting and the diagnostic verb applied to form
Length
under a minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — understood only alongside SN 33.1–20
Why this discourse
This merged file marks a further escalation in compression: where SN 33.6–20's own three cycles each preserved at least a fragment of the opening question or the diagnostic answer's own closing line, this file — and the five further cycles following it through SN 33.50 — reduce to a single line: "At Sāvatthī. 'Vaccha, it is because of not penetrating form …'" The claim itself is unchanged; only the source's own tolerance for restating it has shrunk further.
Reading guide
The most compressed cycle so far
This file's entire surviving content is a single sentence: the setting, and the diagnostic verb (appaṭivedha, "not penetrating") applied to form, with everything else — the question, the remaining four aggregates, the closing line — left to inference.
A pattern that will hold for six consecutive cycles
This same single-line shape recurs identically at SN 33.26–30, 31–35, 36–40, 41–45, and 46–50 — six diagnostic-verb cycles in a row compressed to their absolute minimum, each differing from its neighbors by only the one verb.
Fifth of eleven diagnostic verbs
Appaṭivedha ("not penetrating") is the fifth verb in this saṃyutta's own eleven-verb sequence, following not knowing, not seeing, not comprehending, and not understanding.
A genuine feature of transmission, not an omission
As with other severely compressed peyyāla ranges elsewhere in this project's coverage of the Saṃyutta Nikāya, this discourse's extreme brevity is quoted here exactly as the source gives it rather than expanded into invented prose.
Key terms
appaṭivedha — not penetrating — the fifth of eleven near-synonymous diagnostic verbs
rūpa — form — the only aggregate named at all in this file's own single surviving line
ananubodha — not understanding — the previous cycle's own diagnostic verb, replaced here by appaṭivedha
peyyāla — an elision mark — here compressing an entire five-discourse cycle to a single line
hetu — cause — the diagnostic frame's own recurring opening word, implied here though not restated
The text
The discourse exactly as the source preserves it: a single surviving line. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).
§1At Sāvatthī. “Vaccha, it is because of not penetrating form …”
· · ·
Self-check quiz
5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.
Question 1 of 5
How much content survives for this entire five-discourse cycle?
Correct: A. The most compressed cycle in this saṃyutta so far.
Question 2 of 5
What diagnostic verb does this cycle use?
Correct: A. The fifth of eleven near-synonymous diagnostic verbs.
Question 3 of 5
How many further cycles will repeat this exact same single-line compression?
Correct: A. Six diagnostic-verb cycles in a row compressed to their absolute minimum.
Question 4 of 5
What does this reading guide do with this file's extreme brevity?
Correct: A. Consistent with this project's practice on other severely compressed peyyāla ranges.
Question 5 of 5
What single element changes between this cycle and SN 33.16–20's own?
Correct: A. The underlying five-aggregate diagnostic claim remains entirely unchanged.
