Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.186

The Interior Was Impermanent in the Past

Ajjhattātītāniccasutta — Saṭṭhipeyyālavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants
Form
A full worked example: the interior sense fields declared impermanent in the past, then the complete disillusionment-to-liberation formula
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — opens round two with the fullest text this round will offer

Why this discourse

This discourse opens round two of Saṭṭhipeyyālavagga's own matrix: the same interior/exterior × impermanent/suffering/not-self structure round one already ran, but with past/future/present replacing desire/greed/both as the second variable — and, unlike round one's simple instruction to give up, this round attaches the project's own familiar disillusionment-to-liberation formula already published at, among many other places, SN 22.9-11's identical Kālattaya (“three times”) treatment of the five aggregates.

Reading guide

A new second variable: the three times

“In the past the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind were impermanent” opens this discourse — the interior sense fields, declared impermanent not simply in general but specifically in the past, the first of round two's own three time-values (past, future, present).

The full liberation formula, spelled out once more

Where round one closed each discourse with a bare instruction to give up desire or greed, this discourse runs the complete formula this project has traced across dozens of earlier discourses: seeing the sense fields' impermanence, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned, disillusionment fades into dispassion, dispassion frees, and the freed one knows they are freed — “rebirth is ended…”

A precise match already published: SN 22.9-11

This discourse's own structure — a time-value crossed with impermanence, closing in the full liberation formula — is not new to this project. SN 22.9 (Kālattayaaniccasutta), already published in Book III, runs the identical three-times formula for the five aggregates rather than the six sense fields; SN 22.10 and 22.11 continue with suffering and not-self, exactly mirroring the three qualities this round will cycle through here.

Key terms

atīta — past — this discourse's own time-value, the first of round two's three (past, future, present)
cakkhu…aniccaṁ atītaṁ — “the eye…was impermanent [in the past]” — this discourse's own opening declaration
nibbindati — grows disillusioned — the first step of the liberation formula this discourse spells out in full
vimuttasmiṁ vimuttamiti ñāṇaṁ hoti — “when they're freed, they know they're freed” — the formula's own closing recognition, before the arahant declaration
kālattaya — the three times (past, present, future) — the name this project has already used for the identical formula at SN 22.9-11, applied there to the five aggregates

The text

The complete discourse: the declaration, then the full disillusionment-to-liberation formula. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, in the past the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind were impermanent.

§2Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind.

§3Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed. They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What new second variable does this discourse introduce, replacing round one's desire/greed/both?
Correct: A. Atīta (past) is the first of round two's three time-values.
Question 2 of 5
How does this discourse's own closing formula differ from round one's?
Correct: A. This project's familiar nibbidā-virāga-vimutti-ñāṇa sequence, closing with the arahant declaration.
Question 3 of 5
What already-published discourse runs the identical three-times-plus-liberation formula for the five aggregates?
Correct: A. SN 22.9-11 already ran this same formula for the five aggregates; this discourse applies it to the six sense fields instead.
Question 4 of 5
What time-value does this specific discourse (SN 35.186) address?
Correct: A. Atītaṁ — the past, the first of three, before future (SN 35.187) and present (SN 35.188) follow.
Question 5 of 5
Why does this discourse receive the fullest text of round two's opening trio?
Correct: A. The same worked-example pattern this project has traced across every combinatorial vagga: the first item spelled out, later items compressed.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0