The identical timeless structure as SN 35.222-226, with not-self substituted, followed by the vagga's own closing colophon and summary uddāna
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — closes the vagga, with an untranslated colophon this guide describes rather than quotes
Why this discourse
This discourse closes Saṭṭhipeyyālavagga, the vagga's own sixtieth and final discourse: the exterior sense fields declared not-self, timelessly, mirroring SN 22.14's own not-self declaration once more. Its own closing colophon carries this project's most precise piece of self-documentation yet — an untranslated uddāna verse that spells out, in the Pāli root itself, the exact arithmetic (18+18+18+6=60) this reading guide has reconstructed independently across all four rounds of this vagga's own combinatorial matrix.
Reading guide
Not-self, closing the vagga's own timeless round
“Sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas are not-self…” completes round four's own three-quality cycle and, with it, Saṭṭhipeyyālavagga's own sixty-discourse matrix — the fourth and final time this vagga runs the impermanent/suffering/not-self sequence to its own close.
A colophon unlike any other in this project: “samatto,” not “X-o”
Every earlier vagga-closing colophon in this project (Yamakavaggo dutiyo, Sabbavaggo tatiyo, Nandikkhayavaggo paṭhamo, and so on) names the vagga and gives it an ordinal position within its own paṇṇāsaka. This discourse's own colophon instead reads “Saṭṭhipeyyālo samatto” — “the sixty abbreviated [texts] are complete” — dropping both the “-vagga” suffix and any ordinal position, marking completion of a named set rather than a vagga's own place in sequence. This reading guide does not know why this one vagga alone receives this different shape of colophon, though its own unusually formulaic, peyyāla-heavy character may be the reason: a matrix of sixty elided texts may have felt to its own compilers more like a completed set to be tallied than a vagga to be numbered.
A prediction not confirmed: no “dutiyo” appears
This project's own working notes, following the ordinal pattern already confirmed at Yogakkhemivagga (“paṭhamo,” opening the third paṇṇāsaka) and Nandikkhayavagga (“paṭhamo,” opening the fourth), had anticipated this vagga's own colophon would read “Saṭṭhipeyyālavaggo dutiyo” — confirming it as the fourth paṇṇāsaka's own second vagga. That prediction is not confirmed: this discourse's own colophon carries no vagga-ordinal language at all, only the “samatto” completion-marker described above. This reading guide states this honestly rather than forcing the earlier prediction onto a colophon that does not, in fact, supply it — the fourth paṇṇāsaka's own internal vagga count remains, for now, unconfirmed by this particular discourse.
An uddāna that does its own arithmetic
This discourse's own closing uddāna, left untranslated in the Pāli root exactly as every other vagga-summary verse in this project, is unusually explicit about its own count: “chandena aṭṭhārasa honti” (“with desire, there are eighteen”, round one), “atītena ca dve nava” (“and with the past [set], two nines”, round two's eighteen), “yadaniccā aṭṭhārasa vuttā, tayo ajjhattabāhirā” (“‘whatever is impermanent,’ eighteen are told, three each for interior and exterior”, round three's eighteen), closing with “peyyālo saṭṭhiko vutto buddhena ādiccabandhunā” (“the sixty-fold abbreviated formula was spoken by the Buddha, kinsman of the sun”) and “suttantāni saṭṭhi” (“the discourses: sixty”). Eighteen plus eighteen plus eighteen plus six equals sixty — the uddāna's own arithmetic matches, segment for segment, the combinatorial structure this reading guide independently reconstructed by reading each of this vagga's own thirty pages against bilara-data directly, without having read this colophon in advance.
Key terms
saṭṭhipeyyālo samatto — “the sixty abbreviated [texts] are complete” — this discourse's own closing colophon, left untranslated in the Pāli root, marking completion of a named set rather than giving a vagga its own ordinal position
chandena aṭṭhārasa honti — “with desire, there are eighteen” — the closing uddāna's own first line, confirming round one's own eighteen-discourse count
atītena ca dve nava — “and with the past [set], two nines” — confirming round two's own eighteen (2 × 9)
yadaniccā aṭṭhārasa vuttā, tayo ajjhattabāhirā — “‘whatever is impermanent,’ eighteen are told, three each for interior and exterior” — confirming round three's own eighteen and, in its own final clause, round four's own six
suttantāni saṭṭhi — “the discourses: sixty” — the uddāna's own closing tally, 18+18+18+6=60
The text
The complete discourse, apart from its own closing colophon and uddāna (both left untranslated in the Pāli root and described, not quoted, above): the declaration, naming each of the six exterior sense fields, then the liberation formula in compressed form. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).
§1“Mendicants, sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas are not-self. Seeing this … They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”
· · ·
Self-check quiz
5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.
Question 1 of 5
What does this discourse declare of the exterior sense fields, closing round four's own cycle?
Correct: A. Anattā, completing round four's own three-mark cycle for the exterior fields.
Question 2 of 5
How does this discourse's own closing colophon, “Saṭṭhipeyyālo samatto,” differ in shape from every other vagga-closing colophon in this project?
Correct: A. Every earlier colophon reads “[Vagga name]vaggo [ordinal]”; this one reads “Saṭṭhipeyyālo samatto” instead.
Question 3 of 5
Does this discourse's own colophon confirm this project's working prediction of “Saṭṭhipeyyālavaggo dutiyo” (the fourth paṇṇāsaka's second vagga)?
Correct: A. This reading guide states honestly that the earlier prediction is not confirmed by this particular colophon's own different shape.
Question 4 of 5
What arithmetic does the closing uddāna's own untranslated verse spell out?
Correct: A. Chandena aṭṭhārasa honti, atītena ca dve nava, yadaniccā aṭṭhārasa vuttā tayo ajjhattabāhirā, suttantāni saṭṭhi — the colophon's own line-by-line count.
Question 5 of 5
How does the uddāna's own arithmetic relate to this reading guide's own independent reconstruction of the vagga's structure?
Correct: A. The uddāna's own segment-by-segment count matches the structure this reading guide worked out independently before consulting this colophon.