Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.246

The Simile of the Harp

Vīṇopamasutta — Āsīvisavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the assembled mendicants
Form
A direct instruction to shield the mind, two agricultural similes about an ox and ripened crops, and a closing simile of a king dismantling a harp
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — three similes building toward one conclusion

Why this discourse

This discourse opens with a direct instruction: when desire, greed, hatred, delusion, or aversion arises for any of the six senses, a mendicant should shield the mind by naming the path they're on as “dangerous and perilous, thorny and tangled... not worthy of you.” Two similes about an ox raiding ripened crops contrast a negligent caretaker who lets the ox indulge freely with a diligent one who repeatedly disciplines it until it never returns. The discourse then closes with its own most memorable image: a king who, hearing an arched harp for the first time, insists on having “just the sound” itself fetched to him, and when told this is impossible, smashes the instrument into pieces, burns the splinters, and scatters the ashes — concluding there was never anything to the harp at all.

Reading guide

Shielding the mind with a named judgment

The opening instruction is a specific verbal formula, not a vague resolve: naming the path itself “a wrong turn, a bad path, in poor condition,” frequented by untrue persons, and declaring it “not worthy of you” — run identically for all six senses.

An ox, disciplined until it remembers the beating

The diligent caretaker doesn't merely chase the ox away once; the text specifies a second and even a third repetition of grabbing it by the muzzle, holding it by the hump, and giving it “a good thrashing” before it finally learns, through memory of the pain, never to return — paralleled by a mendicant's mind becoming genuinely stilled and immersed in samādhi only through repeated, not single, restraint at the six fields of contact.

A king who wants the sound without the harp

The king's demand — “I've had enough of that arched harp! Just fetch me the sound” — treats the sound as something separable from the instrument that produces it, a category error the simile deliberately sets up before dismantling it.

Searching for the aggregates, and finding nothing to hold

The harp, explained as “made of many components assembled together... the soundbox, the leather resonator, the neck, the tuning cords, the strings, the plectrum, and a person to play it,” is directly compared to a mendicant searching for form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness “anywhere they might be reborn” and finding, at the end of the search, that ideas of “I” or “mine” or “I am” are no more — just as there was, in the end, nothing separable called an arched harp.

Key terms

cittaṁ nivāretabbaṁ — “the mind should be shielded” — the discourse's own opening instruction, run identically across all six senses
kummaggo ca duhitiko ca — “a wrong turn, a bad path, in poor condition” — part of the exact verbal formula used to name and reject the path of desire, greed, hatred, delusion, or aversion
gopālako appamatto — the diligent caretaker — who repeatedly disciplines the crop-raiding ox until it never returns, paralleled with genuine stilling of the mind through repeated restraint
saddameva me āharā'ti — “just fetch me the sound” — the king's own impossible demand, treating the harp's sound as separable from the instrument
ahanti vā mamanti vā asmīti vā — “I,” “mine,” or “I am” — the ideas the discourse says are “no more” once the search through the five aggregates finds nothing to hold, exactly as no separable harp survives the king's own search

The text

The complete discourse: the shielding instruction, the two ox-and-crops similes, and the closing harp simile. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, any monk or nun who has desire or greed or hate or delusion or aversion come up for sights known by the eye should shield their mind from them: ‘This path is dangerous and perilous, thorny and tangled; it’s a wrong turn, a bad path, in poor condition. This path is frequented by untrue persons, not by true persons. It’s not worthy of you.’ The mind should be shielded from this when it comes to sights known by the eye. Any monk or nun who has desire or greed or hate or delusion or repulsion come up for sounds … smells … tastes … touches … ideas known by the mind should shield their mind against them: ‘This path is dangerous and perilous, thorny and tangled; it’s a wrong turn, a bad path, a sorry state. This path is frequented by untrue persons, not by true persons. It’s not worthy of you.’ The mind should be shielded from this when it comes to ideas known by the mind.

§2Suppose the crops have ripened, but the caretaker is negligent. If an ox fond of crops invades the crops they’d indulge themselves as much as they like. In the same way, when an unlearned ordinary person doesn’t exercise restraint when it comes to the six fields of contact, they indulge themselves in the five kinds of sensual stimulation as much as they like.

§3Suppose the crops have ripened, and the caretaker is diligent. If an ox fond of crops invades the crops the caretaker would grab them firmly by the muzzle. Then they’d grab them above the hump and hold them fast there. Then they’d give them a good thrashing before driving them away. For a second time, and even a third time, the same thing might happen. As a result, no matter how often they might stand or sit in a village or wilderness, that ox fond of crops would never invade that crop again, remembering the beating they got earlier. In the same way, when a mendicant’s mind is straightened up, well straightened up when it comes to the six fields of contact, becomes stilled internally; it settles, unifies, and becomes immersed in samādhi.

§4Suppose a king or their chief minister had never heard the sound of an arched harp. When he first hears the sound, he’d say, ‘Oh my, what is making this sound, so arousing, sensuous, intoxicating, infatuating, and captivating?’ They’d say to him, ‘That, sir, is an arched harp.’ He’d say, ‘Go, mister, fetch me that arched harp.’ So they’d fetch it and say, ‘This, sir, is that arched harp.’ He’d say, ‘I’ve had enough of that arched harp! Just fetch me the sound.’ They’d say, ‘Sir, this arched harp is made of many components assembled together, which make a sound when they’re played. That is, it depends on the soundbox, the leather resonator, the neck, the tuning cords, the strings, the plectrum, and a person to play it properly. That’s how an arched harp is made of many components assembled together, which make a sound when they’re played.’ But he’d split that harp into ten pieces or a hundred pieces, then splinter it up. He’d burn the splinters with fire, and reduce them to ashes. Then he’d whisk away the ashes in a strong wind, or glide them down a swift stream. Then he’d say, ‘It seems that there’s nothing to this thing called an arched harp or whatever’s called an arched harp! But people waste their time with it, negligent and heedless!’ In the same way, a mendicant searches for form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness anywhere they might be reborn. As they search in this way, their ideas of ‘I’ or ‘mine’ or ‘I am’ are no more.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What verbal formula does this discourse instruct a mendicant to use to shield the mind?
Correct: A. Run identically across all six senses whenever desire, greed, hatred, delusion, or aversion arises.
Question 2 of 5
How does the diligent caretaker eventually stop the ox from raiding the crops?
Correct: A. Not a single correction but a repeated one, paralleled with genuine stilling of the mind through repeated restraint.
Question 3 of 5
What does the king demand after first hearing the harp's sound?
Correct: A. "I've had enough of that arched harp! Just fetch me the sound" — treating the sound as separable from its source.
Question 4 of 5
What does the king conclude after smashing the harp and finding no separable sound within it?
Correct: A. "It seems that there's nothing to this thing called an arched harp!" — a search that finds no separable essence.
Question 5 of 5
What does the harp simile directly parallel in a mendicant's own search?
Correct: A. Just as no separable harp survives the king's search, no "I" or "mine" survives the search through the five aggregates.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0