Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.27

Without Completely Understanding (2nd)

Dutiyaaparijānanasutta — Sabbavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
SN 35.26's own two-part diagnostic, repeated with a leaner four-item definition of "the all"
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — the same diagnostic as SN 35.26, with a changed scope

Why this discourse

This discourse repeats SN 35.26's own two-part negative-and-positive diagnostic and fourfold verb chain (directly knowing, completely understanding, having dispassion for, giving up) word for word — but replaces the five-part-per-sense definition of "the all" used since SN 35.24 with a leaner four-item one: the base, its object, its consciousness, and, closing each list, "things knowable by that consciousness." The argument repeats exactly; what counts as "the all" changes.

Reading guide

The same fourfold verb chain, the same two-part structure

Anabhijānaṁ, aparijānaṁ, avirājayaṁ, appajahaṁ — the identical four terms from SN 35.26, in the identical negative-then-positive arrangement, applied once again to "the all." At the level of argument, this is a genuine repeat.

A changed definition of "the all": four items, not five

"The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and things knowable by eye consciousness" (cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbā dhammā) — dropping SN 35.24–26's own "eye contact" and "the feeling that arises dependent on eye contact," and adding instead a single closing category that folds in whatever consciousness itself can know.

Two definitions of "the all" now stand side by side

SN 35.26 used the five-part breakdown (base, object, consciousness, contact, feeling) carried over from SN 35.24–25; this discourse instead uses the leaner four-item version, closing on "things knowable" rather than feeling — the same diagnostic claim, applied to two genuinely different scopes of "the all" within the same trio.

Handing off to this vagga's own narrative pair

Immediately after this discourse, Sabbavagga arrives at its own two pre-existing narrative discourses, SN 35.28 ("Burning") and SN 35.29 ("Overcome") — the vagga's midpoint, where the register shifts from bare formula to specific place, audience, and image.

Key terms

cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbā dhammā — "things knowable by eye consciousness" — the closing category of this discourse's own leaner, four-item definition of "the all"
anabhijānaṁ aparijānaṁ avirājayaṁ appajahaṁ — the same fourfold negative chain introduced at SN 35.26, repeated here unchanged
dukkhakkhayāya — "for the ending of suffering" — the same stakes named in SN 35.26, carried over unchanged
cakkhuviññāṇaṁ — eye consciousness — the third of this discourse's own four-item definition of "the all"
abhabbo dukkhakkhayāya / bhabbo dukkhakkhayāya — "incapable of the ending of suffering" / "capable of the ending of suffering" — this discourse's own negative and positive halves, differing only in this single verb pair

The text

The complete discourse: the negative condition, then its exact positive mirror, applied to a four-item definition of "the all." Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, without directly knowing and completely understanding the all, without dispassion for it and giving it up, you can’t end suffering. And what is the all, without directly knowing and completely understanding which, without dispassion for it and giving it up, you can’t end suffering? The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and things knowable by eye consciousness. The ear … nose … tongue … body … The mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and things knowable by mind consciousness. This is the all, without directly knowing and completely understanding which, without dispassion for it and giving it up, you can’t end suffering.

§2By directly knowing and completely understanding the all, having dispassion for it and giving it up, you can end suffering. And what is the all, directly knowing and completely understanding which, having dispassion for it and giving it up, you can end suffering? The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and things knowable by eye consciousness. The ear … nose … tongue … body … The mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and things knowable by mind consciousness. This is the all, directly knowing and completely understanding which, having dispassion for it and giving it up, you can end suffering.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What stays identical between this discourse and SN 35.26?
Correct: A. A genuine repeat of argument, applied to a changed scope.
Question 2 of 5
What four items make up this discourse's own definition of "the all"?
Correct: A. Dropping SN 35.24–26's own "contact" and "feeling," closing instead on a category folding in whatever consciousness can know.
Question 3 of 5
How does this discourse's own definition of "the all" compare to SN 35.26's?
Correct: A. Two genuinely different scopes of "the all" now stand side by side within the same trio.
Question 4 of 5
What comes immediately after this discourse in Sabbavagga?
Correct: A. The vagga's midpoint, where the register shifts to specific place, audience, and image.
Question 5 of 5
What does cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbā dhammā mean?
Correct: A. The closing category of this discourse's own leaner, four-item definition.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0