Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.30

The Practice Fit for Uprooting

Samugghātasāruppasutta — Sabbavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
A fourfold not-conceiving formula, applied to all six sense fields and, at its own close, to "the all" as an explicit totality
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a new verb and a fourfold formula reward careful reading

Why this discourse

This discourse opens Sabbavagga's own closing trio (SN 35.30–32) with a genuinely new verb, maññati ("to conceive"), and a fourfold negation built around it, applied across all six sense fields — and, uniquely among this vagga's ten discourses, folds its own opening term (sabba, from SN 35.23) back into its own closing formula, explicitly extending the not-conceiving instruction to "the all" as a totality, not only to its six component fields.

Reading guide

Maññati: a new verb, a fourfold negation

For each sense field, a mendicant "does not conceive anything to be the eye, does not conceive it in the eye, does not conceive it as the eye, and does not conceive that 'the eye is mine'" — four distinct angles of possessive or identifying thought, all four negated in turn, repeated for sights, eye consciousness, eye contact, and the feeling arising from eye contact, then for each of the remaining five sense fields.

"The all" itself, folded back into its own closing formula

At its own close, this discourse extends the identical fourfold negation to "the all" as an explicit totality — not conceiving anything to be all, in all, as all, or that "all is mine" — the only discourse in Sabbavagga to explicitly reapply its own vagga-naming term (SN 35.23's own sabba) to its own closing instruction.

A closing chain: not conceiving, to personal extinguishment

Not conceiving → not grasping at anything in the world → not anxious → personally extinguished (parinibbāyati) → the standard declaration, "Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed …" — a chain of consequence distinct from SN 35.28–29's own disillusionment-freedom sequence, though ending in the same declaration.

Three near-synonyms for one closing trio

This discourse's own title word, sāruppa ("fit," "suitable"), gives way to sappāya ("conducive," "beneficial") in the two discourses that follow — three treatments of "the practice for uprooting all conceiving," not one, distinguished by these near-synonymous qualifiers.

Key terms

maññati — "conceives" — the new verb this discourse's own fourfold negation is built around
sāruppa — "fit," or "suitable" — this discourse's own title qualifier for the uprooting practice
samugghāta — "uprooting" — shared across all three titles of this vagga's own closing trio
parinibbāyati — "is personally extinguished" — the closing step of this discourse's own consequence chain
cakkhusmiṁ na maññati — "does not conceive [anything] in the eye" — the second of this discourse's own fourfold negation

The text

The complete discourse, with the ear, nose, tongue, and body sections compressed once the pattern is established for the eye. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, I will teach you the practice fit for uprooting all conceiving. Listen and apply your mind well, I will speak. … And what is the practice fit for uprooting all conceiving?

§2It’s when a mendicant does not conceive anything to be the eye, does not conceive it in the eye, does not conceive it as the eye, and does not conceive that ‘the eye is mine.’ They don’t conceive anything to be sights, they don’t conceive it in sights, they don’t conceive it as sights, and they don’t conceive that ‘sights are mine.’ They don’t conceive eye consciousness … eye contact … They don’t conceive anything to be the pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on eye contact. They don’t conceive it in that, they don’t conceive it as that, and they don’t conceive that ‘that is mine.’ They don’t conceive anything to be the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind … They don’t conceive anything to be the pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on mind contact. They don’t conceive it in that, they don’t conceive it as that, and they don’t conceive that ‘that is mine.’ They don’t conceive anything to be all, they don’t conceive it in all, they don’t conceive it as all, and they don’t conceive that ‘all is mine.’

§3Not conceiving, they don’t grasp at anything in the world. Not grasping, they’re not anxious. Not being anxious, they personally become extinguished. They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’ This is the practice fit for uprooting all conceiving.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What new verb does this discourse introduce, and how is it negated?
Correct: A. Four distinct angles of possessive or identifying thought, applied to every sense field.
Question 2 of 5
What makes this discourse unique among Sabbavagga's ten discourses?
Correct: A. Not conceiving anything to be, in, as, or "mine" regarding "the all" itself, not only its six component fields.
Question 3 of 5
What is the closing consequence chain this discourse describes?
Correct: A. A chain distinct from SN 35.28–29's own disillusionment-freedom sequence, though ending in the same declaration.
Question 4 of 5
What does this discourse's own title word, sāruppa, mean?
Correct: A. Distinguished from sappāya ("conducive"), the qualifier used in the two discourses that follow.
Question 5 of 5
How do the two discourses that follow (SN 35.31–32) relate to this one?
Correct: A. Sāruppa here, sappāya in SN 35.31 and 35.32 — near-synonyms distinguishing three separate treatments.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0