Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.70

Upavāṇa on What is Apparent in the Present Life

Upavāṇasandiṭṭhikasutta — Migajālavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse — no relocation cue is given after SN 35.69's own Rājagaha scene
Speakers
Venerable Upavāṇa questioning the Buddha
Form
A request to explain a standing epithet of the Dhamma, answered twice over — once for a mendicant who still has desire for what's sensed, once for one who doesn't
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — an abstract epithet, grounded in immediate self-observation

Why this discourse

Venerable Upavāṇa asks the Buddha to explain a phrase this project has already met as a standing epithet of the Dhamma itself — “apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves” — recited whenever practitioners recall the Buddha's own qualities of the teaching. The Buddha's answer grounds this abstract epithet in the plainest possible observation: a mendicant who sees a sight experiences both the sight and (if present) desire for it, and simply knows, right now, whether that desire is present or absent — no appeal to memory, prediction, or authority required. This immediate, introspectable knowability is what “apparent in the present life” (sandiṭṭhika) actually means.

Reading guide

A stock epithet, grounded

“Apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant” is a standing formula describing the Dhamma; here Upavāṇa asks what it actually cashes out to, in practice.

Desire present, and known as present

The first half: a mendicant who sees a sight, hears a sound (and so through touch), or knows an idea, and experiences desire for it, simply knows that desire is there — this knowing itself is what makes the teaching “apparent in the present life.”

Desire absent, and known as absent

The second half mirrors the first exactly, for a mendicant who experiences no desire for what's sensed — the same immediate self-knowledge, now of an absence rather than a presence.

Immediate, not eventual

Neither half appeals to what will happen later or what happened before — the teaching's own “apparent in the present life” quality rests entirely on this moment's own introspectable knowing.

Key terms

sandiṭṭhika — apparent in the present life — the epithet this discourse defines
chanda — desire — present or absent, the discourse's own pivot
pajānāti — understands, knows — the immediate self-knowledge this discourse describes
akālika — immediately effective — part of the same stock epithet, cross-referenced here
ehipassika — inviting inspection — literally “come and see”, also part of the same stock epithet

The text

The complete discourse: Upavāṇa's question, then the Buddha's answer given twice — once for desire present, once for desire absent. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1Then Venerable Upavāṇa went up to the Buddha … and said to him: “Sir, they speak of ‘a teaching apparent in the present life’. In what way is the teaching apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves?”

§2“Upavāṇa, take a mendicant who sees a sight with their eyes. They experience both the sight and the desire for the sight. There is desire for sights in them, and they understand that. Since this is so, this is how the teaching is apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves. Next, take a mendicant who hears … smells … tastes … touches …

§3Next, take a mendicant who knows an idea with their mind. They experience both the idea and the desire for the idea. There is desire for ideas in them, and they understand that. Since this is so, this is how the teaching is apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves.

§4Take a mendicant who sees a sight with their eyes. They experience the sight but no desire for the sight. There is no desire for sights in them, and they understand that. Since this is so, this is how the teaching is apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves. Next, take a mendicant who hears … smells … tastes … touches …

§5Next, take a mendicant who knows an idea with their mind. They experience the idea but no desire for the idea. There is no desire for ideas in them, and they understand that. Since this is so, this is how the teaching is apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What phrase does Upavāṇa ask the Buddha to explain?
Correct: A. A standing epithet of the Dhamma this project has already met elsewhere.
Question 2 of 5
What does a mendicant simply need to know, according to the Buddha's answer, for the teaching to count as “apparent in the present life”?
Correct: A. Immediate, introspectable self-knowledge, not memory or prediction.
Question 3 of 5
How many of the six senses receive full elaboration in this discourse, versus elided in one line?
Correct: A. Eye and mind bookend the sweep; ear, nose, tongue, and body collapse to a single elided line each half.
Question 4 of 5
What is the second half of this discourse's own two-part answer?
Correct: A. Desire absent, and known as absent — the same immediate knowing, mirrored.
Question 5 of 5
What does “sandiṭṭhika” mean, as this discourse defines it?
Correct: A. This discourse's own central term, grounded in the plainest possible observation.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0